Belo Luís, Serrano Isa, Cunha Eva, Carneiro Carla, Tavares Luis, Miguel Carreira L, Oliveira Manuela
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health (CIISA) / Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisbon, Portugal.
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Mar 14;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5.
Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient's microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic resistance dissemination. However, in veterinary medicine there is no agreement on which biocide is the most effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols in dogs. A total of 46 animals were randomly assigned for an asepsis protocol with an aqueous solution of 7.5% povidone-iodine or with an alcoholic solution of 2% chlorhexidine. For each dog, two skin swab samples were collected at pre-asepsis and post-asepsis, for bacterial quantification by conventional techniques and isolation of methicillin-resistant species.
Most samples collected at the post-asepsis did not present bacterial growth, both for the animals subjected to the povidone-iodine (74%) or to the chlorhexidine (70%) protocols. In only 9% of the cases a significant bacterial logarithmic reduction was not observed, indicating possible resistance to these agents. Also, the logarithmic reduction of the bacterial quantification from pre- and post-asepsis time, was not statistically different for povidone-iodine (6.51 ± 1.94 log10) and chlorhexidine (6.46 ± 2.62 log10) protocol. From the 39% pre-asepsis swabs which showed bacterial growth in MRSA modified chromogenic agar medium, only one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus aureus and one as S. epidermidis. False positives were mainly other staphylococci species, as well as Enterobacteriaceae.
Pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine showed similar efficacy in the elimination of methicillin resistant bacteria and preventing surgical site infections in dogs undergoing surgery.
大多数手术部位感染(SSI)是由患者微生物群中的共生菌和病原菌引起的,其中可能包括抗生素耐药菌株。术前皮肤无菌操作是降低SSI发生率以及防止抗生素耐药性传播的预防措施之一。然而,在兽医学中,对于哪种杀菌剂最有效尚无定论。本研究的目的是评估两种术前皮肤无菌操作方案对犬的有效性。总共46只动物被随机分配接受7.5%聚维酮碘水溶液或2%氯己定酒精溶液的无菌操作方案。对于每只犬,在无菌操作前和无菌操作后采集两份皮肤拭子样本,通过传统技术进行细菌定量并分离耐甲氧西林菌种。
对于接受聚维酮碘(74%)或氯己定(70%)方案的动物,无菌操作后采集的大多数样本均未出现细菌生长。仅在9%的病例中未观察到显著的细菌对数减少,表明可能对这些药剂耐药。此外,聚维酮碘(6.51±1.94 log10)和氯己定(6.46±2.62 log10)方案在无菌操作前后细菌定量的对数减少在统计学上无差异。在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌改良显色琼脂培养基中显示细菌生长的39%的术前拭子中,仅鉴定出一株金黄色葡萄球菌和一株表皮葡萄球菌。假阳性主要是其他葡萄球菌属菌种以及肠杆菌科细菌。
聚维酮碘或氯己定术前皮肤无菌操作方案在消除耐甲氧西林细菌和预防接受手术的犬的手术部位感染方面显示出相似的疗效。