Suppr超能文献

使用器械接触振动对机器人手术技能进行客观评估。

Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations.

作者信息

Gomez Ernest D, Aggarwal Rajesh, McMahan William, Bark Karlin, Kuchenbecker Katherine J

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, 224 Towne Building, 220 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1419-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4346-z. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical skill evaluation ordinarily requires tedious video review and survey completion, while new automatic approaches focus on evaluating the quality of the surgeon's movements in free space. Robotic surgical instrument vibrations are simple to measure and physically correspond to how roughly instruments are handled, but they have yet to be studied as a measure of technical surgical skill.

METHODS

Thirteen surgeons used a robotic surgery system (da Vinci S by Intuitive Surgical) to perform four trials each of peg transfer (PT), needle pass (NP), and intracorporeal suturing (IS). Completion time, instrument vibrations, and applied forces were measured for each trial; root mean square (RMS) and total sum of squares (TSS) were calculated from both the vibration and force recordings. Four experienced surgeons blindly assessed the task videos using a Global Rating Scale (GRS), and skill metrics were compared between the eight novices and five experienced participants. Stepwise regression was performed to predict GRS score from objective skill metrics. The concurrent validity of each metric was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The GRS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and strong inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.84). Compared to novices, experienced surgeons earned higher GRS scores and performed tasks with lower vibration magnitudes, lower forces, and shorter completion times in 15 of 18 task-metric combinations (p values ranging from 0.042 to <0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated that including vibration and force magnitudes along with completion time in skill prediction models improves the objective classification of subjects as novice or experienced for all tasks studied (PT: 90% sensitivity, 75% specificity; NP: 85% sensitivity, 84% specificity; suturing: 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

RMS and TSS instrument vibrations are novel construct-valid measures of robotic surgical skill that enable the development of objective skill assessment models comparable to observer-based ratings.

摘要

背景

手术技能评估通常需要繁琐的视频回顾和问卷调查的完成,而新的自动评估方法则专注于评估外科医生在自由空间中的动作质量。机器人手术器械的振动易于测量,并且在物理上与器械的操作粗糙程度相对应,但尚未将其作为衡量手术技术技能的指标进行研究。

方法

13名外科医生使用机器人手术系统(直观外科公司的da Vinci S)对每个进行4次套圈转移(PT)、针穿刺(NP)和体内缝合(IS)试验。每次试验测量完成时间、器械振动和施加的力;从振动和力记录中计算均方根(RMS)和平方和总和(TSS)。4名经验丰富的外科医生使用全球评分量表(GRS)对任务视频进行盲评,并比较8名新手和5名经验丰富参与者之间的技能指标。进行逐步回归以从客观技能指标预测GRS评分。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估每个指标的同时效度。

结果

GRS显示出极好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.91)和较强的评分者间信度(ICC = 0.84)。与新手相比,经验丰富的外科医生获得了更高的GRS评分,并且在18种任务指标组合中的15种中,以更低的振动幅度、更小的力和更短的完成时间执行任务(p值范围从0.042到<0.001)。ROC分析表明,在技能预测模型中纳入振动和力的大小以及完成时间,可改善所有研究任务中新手或经验丰富受试者的客观分类(PT:90%敏感性,75%特异性;NP:85%敏感性,84%特异性;缝合:100%敏感性,100%特异性)。

结论

RMS和TSS器械振动是机器人手术技能的新型结构效度测量指标,能够开发出与基于观察者的评分相当的客观技能评估模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验