Mukuda Naoko, Fujii Shinya, Inoue Chie, Fukunaga Takeru, Tanabe Yoshio, Itamochi Hiroaki, Ogawa Toshihide
Division of Radiology, Department of Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Division of Reproductive-Perinatal Medicine and Gynecological Oncology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Mar;43(3):720-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25011. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
To investigate the difference in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of differently shaped regions of interest (ROIs) in ovarian tumors, and to investigate the diagnostic ability of differently shaped ROIs in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors.
Fifty-four patients with ovarian tumors with a solid component were evaluated. The patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) examinations including diffusion-weighted imaging using a 3.0T MR system. Two readers measured ADCs using four ROI methods: freehand, square, round, and five small round ROIs. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to assess their measurement reliability and to compare ADCs for each ROI method. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and unpaired t-test on each ROI were used to differentiate benign and malignant ovarian tumors and assess the diagnostic ability.
All ROI methods except the square ROI (0.56) showed good or excellent correlations (0.70-0.91). Minimum and mean ADC values differed significantly between the ROIs (P < 0.05). When using the freehand ROI, the minimum and mean ADC values were the lowest and highest, respectively. The optimal cutoff minimum and mean ADC values of each ROI for differentiating benign and malignant tumors were 0.81-1.06 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s and 1.15-1.52 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s, respectively. The areas under the curve showed no significant differences among the ADCs in the different ROI methods (P > 0.05). Minimum and mean ADCs from all ROIs showed significant differences between benign and malignant tumors (P < 0.05).
The ROI shape influences ADC values and the optimal cutoff ADC values for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors.
研究卵巢肿瘤中不同形状感兴趣区(ROI)表观扩散系数(ADC)测量值的差异,并探讨不同形状ROI在鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤中的诊断能力。
对54例具有实性成分的卵巢肿瘤患者进行评估。患者接受了磁共振(MR)检查,包括使用3.0T MR系统进行扩散加权成像。两名阅片者使用四种ROI方法测量ADC:徒手绘制、方形、圆形和五个小圆形ROI。组内相关系数(ICC)和重复测量方差分析用于评估其测量可靠性,并比较每种ROI方法的ADC值。采用受试者操作特征曲线分析和对每个ROI进行非配对t检验来鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤并评估诊断能力。
除方形ROI(0.56)外,所有ROI方法均显示出良好或极好的相关性(0.70 - 0.91)。各ROI之间的最小和平均ADC值差异显著(P < 0.05)。使用徒手绘制ROI时,最小和平均ADC值分别为最低和最高。区分良恶性肿瘤的每个ROI的最佳截断最小和平均ADC值分别为0.81 - 1.06×10⁻³ mm²/s和1.15 - 1.52×10⁻³ mm²/s。不同ROI方法的ADC曲线下面积无显著差异(P > 0.05)。所有ROI的最小和平均ADC在良性和恶性肿瘤之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。
ROI形状会影响ADC值以及鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤的最佳截断ADC值。