Tsili Athina C, Ntorkou Alexandra, Astrakas Loukas, Xydis Vasilis, Tsampalas Stavros, Sofikitis Nikolaos, Argyropoulou Maria I
Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110, Ioannina, Greece.
Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110, Ioannina, Greece.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
To evaluate the difference in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging of differently shaped regions-of-interest (ROIs) in testicular germ cell neoplasms (TGCNS), the diagnostic ability of differently shaped ROIs in differentiating seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell neoplasms (NSGCNs) and the interobserver variability.
Thirty-three TGCNs were retrospectively evaluated. Patients underwent MR examinations, including DWI on a 1.5-T MR system. Two observers measured mean tumor ADCs using four distinct ROI methods: round, square, freehand and multiple small, round ROIs. The interclass correlation coefficient was analyzed to assess interobserver variability. Statistical analysis was used to compare mean ADC measurements among observers, methods and histologic types.
All ROI methods showed excellent interobserver agreement, with excellent correlation (P<0.001). Multiple, small ROIs provided the lower mean ADC in TGCNs. Seminomas had lower mean ADC compared to NSGCNs for each ROI method (P<0.001). Round ROI proved the most accurate method in characterizing TGCNS.
Interobserver variability in ADC measurement is excellent, irrespective of the ROI shape. Multiple, small round ROIs and round ROI proved the more accurate methods for ADC measurement in the characterization of TGCNs and in the differentiation between seminomas and NSGCNs, respectively.
为评估睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤(TGCNS)中不同形状的感兴趣区(ROI)在扩散加权(DW)磁共振成像时表观扩散系数(ADC)测量值的差异、不同形状ROI在鉴别精原细胞瘤与非精原细胞性生殖细胞肿瘤(NSGCNs)中的诊断能力以及观察者间的变异性。
对33例TGCNS进行回顾性评估。患者接受了MR检查,包括在1.5-T MR系统上进行的DWI检查。两名观察者使用四种不同的ROI方法测量肿瘤平均ADC值:圆形、方形、徒手绘制和多个小圆形ROI。分析组内相关系数以评估观察者间的变异性。采用统计学分析比较观察者、方法和组织学类型之间的平均ADC测量值。
所有ROI方法均显示出极好的观察者间一致性,相关性极佳(P<0.001)。多个小ROI在TGCNS中提供了较低的平均ADC值。对于每种ROI方法,精原细胞瘤的平均ADC值均低于NSGCNs(P<0.001)。圆形ROI被证明是表征TGCNS最准确的方法。
无论ROI形状如何,ADC测量的观察者间变异性都非常好。多个小圆形ROI和圆形ROI分别被证明是在表征TGCNS以及鉴别精原细胞瘤与NSGCNs时进行ADC测量更准确的方法。