Suppr超能文献

健康素养——癌症预防与筛查讨论后的倾听技巧及患者问题

Health literacy-listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions.

作者信息

Mazor Kathleen M, Rubin Donald L, Roblin Douglas W, Williams Andrew E, Han Paul K J, Gaglio Bridget, Cutrona Sarah L, Costanza Mary E, Wagner Joann L

机构信息

Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):920-34. doi: 10.1111/hex.12387. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient question-asking is essential to shared decision making. We sought to describe patients' questions when faced with cancer prevention and screening decisions, and to explore differences in question-asking as a function of health literacy with respect to spoken information (health literacy-listening).

METHODS

Four-hundred and thirty-three (433) adults listened to simulated physician-patient interactions discussing (i) prophylactic tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention, (ii) PSA testing for prostate cancer and (iii) colorectal cancer screening, and identified questions they would have. Health literacy-listening was assessed using the Cancer Message Literacy Test-Listening (CMLT-Listening). Two authors developed a coding scheme, which was applied to all questions. Analyses examined whether participants scoring above or below the median on the CMLT-Listening asked a similar variety of questions.

RESULTS

Questions were coded into six major function categories: risks/benefits, procedure details, personalizing information, additional information, decision making and credibility. Participants who scored higher on the CMLT-Listening asked a greater variety of risks/benefits questions; those who scored lower asked a greater variety of questions seeking to personalize information. This difference persisted after adjusting for education.

CONCLUSION

Patients' health literacy-listening is associated with distinctive patterns of question utilization following cancer screening and prevention counselling. Providers should not only be responsive to the question functions the patient favours, but also seek to ensure that the patient is exposed to the full range of information needed for shared decision making.

摘要

目的

患者提问对于共同决策至关重要。我们试图描述患者在面对癌症预防和筛查决策时提出的问题,并探讨在口头信息方面(健康素养-听力),提问方式因健康素养不同而产生的差异。

方法

433名成年人收听了模拟医患互动内容,这些内容讨论了(i)用于预防乳腺癌的他莫昔芬、(ii)前列腺癌的PSA检测以及(iii)结直肠癌筛查,并找出他们会提出的问题。使用癌症信息素养测试-听力(CMLT-听力)评估健康素养-听力。两位作者制定了一个编码方案,并将其应用于所有问题。分析考察了在CMLT-听力测试中得分高于或低于中位数的参与者提出的问题种类是否相似。

结果

问题被编码为六个主要功能类别:风险/益处、程序细节、信息个性化、额外信息、决策以及可信度。在CMLT-听力测试中得分较高的参与者提出了更多种类的风险/益处问题;得分较低的参与者提出了更多种类的寻求信息个性化的问题。在调整教育因素后,这种差异仍然存在。

结论

患者的健康素养-听力与癌症筛查和预防咨询后不同的问题利用模式相关。医疗服务提供者不仅应回应患者偏好的问题功能,还应努力确保患者接触到共同决策所需的全部信息。

相似文献

1
Health literacy-listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions.
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):920-34. doi: 10.1111/hex.12387. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
3
Patients With Limited Health Literacy Ask Fewer Questions During Office Visits With Hand Surgeons.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1291-1297. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5140-5. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
4
The Cancer Message Literacy Tests: psychometric analyses and validity studies.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
5
Can adults with low literacy understand shared decision making questions? A qualitative investigation.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1796-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 9.
8
Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1611-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.262.

引用本文的文献

2
A literature review to understand health literacy in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 May 31;12(5):779-789. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-732. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?".
J Health Commun. 2020 Dec 1;25(12):951-961. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
6
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina: The Role of Health Literacy.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Aug 9;7(1):42. doi: 10.5334/egems.306.
9
The Future of Patient Engagement in the Governance of Shared Data.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 30;4(2):1214. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1214. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient engagement: the critical catalyst to health reform in the USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):209-11. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.15.
2
Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
6
The Cancer Message Literacy Tests: psychometric analyses and validity studies.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
8
Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
9
Reporting standards for studies of tailored interventions.
Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):331-42. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr108. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验