• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养与癌症筛查:一项系统综述

Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.

作者信息

Oldach Benjamin R, Katz Mira L

机构信息

Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA; Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001
PMID:24207115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3946869/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate published evidence about health literacy and cancer screening.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for English language articles measuring health literacy and cancer screening published in 1990-2011. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were independently reviewed by two investigators using a standardized data abstraction form. Abstracts (n=932) were reviewed and full text retrieved for 83 articles. Ten articles with 14 comparisons of health literacy and cancer screening according to recommended medical guidelines were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Most articles measured health literacy using the S-TOFHLA instrument and documented cancer screening by self-report. There is a trend for an association of inadequate health literacy and lower cancer screening rates, however, the evidence is mixed and limited by study design and measurement issues.

CONCLUSION

A patient's health literacy may be a contributing factor to being within recommended cancer screening guidelines.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Future research should: be conducted using validated health literacy instruments; describe the population included in the study; document cancer screening test completion according to recommended guidelines; verify the completion of cancer screening tests by medical record review; adjust for confounding factors; and report effect size of the association of health literacy and cancer screening.

摘要

目的

评估已发表的关于健康素养与癌症筛查的证据。

方法

检索了七个数据库,查找1990年至2011年期间发表的测量健康素养与癌症筛查的英文文章。符合纳入标准的文章由两名研究人员使用标准化数据提取表进行独立评审。对932篇摘要进行了评审,并检索了83篇文章的全文。分析纳入了10篇文章,其中有14项根据推荐的医学指南对健康素养与癌症筛查进行的比较。

结果

大多数文章使用S-TOFHLA工具测量健康素养,并通过自我报告记录癌症筛查情况。健康素养不足与较低的癌症筛查率之间存在关联趋势,然而,证据参差不齐,且受研究设计和测量问题的限制。

结论

患者的健康素养可能是符合推荐癌症筛查指南的一个促成因素。

实践意义

未来的研究应:使用经过验证的健康素养工具进行;描述研究中纳入的人群;根据推荐指南记录癌症筛查测试的完成情况;通过病历审查核实癌症筛查测试的完成情况;调整混杂因素;并报告健康素养与癌症筛查关联的效应大小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4a/3946869/cbedd1c9fe9c/nihms-532111-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4a/3946869/cbedd1c9fe9c/nihms-532111-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4a/3946869/cbedd1c9fe9c/nihms-532111-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.健康素养与癌症筛查:一项系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
2
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Symptom- and chest-radiography screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative adults and adults with unknown HIV status.症状和胸部 X 线筛查在 HIV 阴性的成年人和 HIV 状态未知的成年人中的活动性肺结核。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 23;3(3):CD010890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010890.pub2.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability and implementation potential of a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas: A qualitative study of patients and general practitioners participating in a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项提高贫困地区结直肠癌筛查率的健康素养干预措施的可接受性及实施潜力:一项针对参与整群随机对照试验的患者和全科医生的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329639. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital engagement and the efficacy of patient portal-based preventive care interventions.数字参与和基于患者门户的预防保健干预措施的效果。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 27;11:20552076251356013. doi: 10.1177/20552076251356013. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.健康素养干预措施与结果:一项更新的系统评价。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar(199):1-941.
2
The Health Literacy Skills Instrument: a 10-item short form.健康素养技能量表:一个 10 项的简短形式。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:191-202. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.718042.
3
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Factors Associated with Attending to the Colorectal Cancer Screening Services among at-Risk Individuals in a Community Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study.
社区护理医院中高危个体接受结直肠癌筛查服务的相关因素:一项横断面分析研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Jun 1;26(6):2163-2173. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.6.2163.
4
From barriers to participation: co-creating an effective reminder letter for breast cancer screening among underserved women in Flanders.从参与障碍入手:共同为弗拉芒地区服务不足的女性创建一份有效的乳腺癌筛查提醒信。
Arch Public Health. 2025 May 14;83(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01591-7.
5
Predictors for psychosocial consequences of screening for liver diseases: A data-driven approach.肝病筛查心理社会后果的预测因素:一种数据驱动的方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0319488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319488. eCollection 2025.
6
Cancer screening and its associated factors in hypertensive individuals: new insights from the 2021 STEPs national study in Iran.高血压患者的癌症筛查及其相关因素:2021年伊朗全国STEP研究的新见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):1454. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22423-x.
7
The association between health literacy and cancer screening participation: A cross-sectional study across three organised screening programmes in Denmark.健康素养与癌症筛查参与率之间的关联:丹麦三项有组织筛查项目的横断面研究
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Mar 14;53:103022. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103022. eCollection 2025 May.
8
DOST: A consolidated health behavior model that maps factors influencing cancer screening uptake.DOST:一种整合的健康行为模型,该模型描绘了影响癌症筛查接受情况的因素。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;83(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01517-3.
9
Follow-up Colorectal Cancer Screening After Negative-Result and Positive-Result Multitarget Stool DNA Tests: A Population-Based Study in Southeast Minnesota.多靶点粪便DNA检测结果为阴性和阳性后的结直肠癌随访筛查:明尼苏达州东南部的一项基于人群的研究
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2025 Feb 26;9(2):100599. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100599. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
The economic burden of breast cancer in western Iran: a cross-sectional cost-of-illness study.伊朗西部乳腺癌的经济负担:一项横断面疾病成本研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jan 22;44(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00738-0.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.
4
A roadmap and best practices for organizations to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care.医疗机构减少医疗保健领域种族和民族差异的路线图和最佳实践。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):992-1000. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2082-9.
5
Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.宫颈癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):880-91, W312. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424.
6
Measuring health literacy in individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and evaluation of available measures.测量糖尿病患者的健康素养:现有测量工具的系统评价和评估。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Feb;40(1):42-55. doi: 10.1177/1090198111436341. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
7
Cancer screening in the United States, 2012: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.美国癌症筛查 2012:对当前美国癌症协会指南及癌症筛查当前问题的回顾。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):129-42. doi: 10.3322/caac.20143. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
8
Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.患者激活可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项针对低收入少数族裔患者的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
9
The influence of sociocultural factors on colonoscopy and FOBT screening adherence among low-income Hispanics.社会文化因素对低收入西班牙裔人群结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验筛查依从性的影响。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Aug;22(3):925-44. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0074.
10
Health literacy and women's health-related behaviors in Taiwan.台湾地区的健康素养与妇女健康相关行为。
Health Educ Behav. 2012 Apr;39(2):210-8. doi: 10.1177/1090198111413126. Epub 2011 Jul 8.