• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?".健康素养有限的患者和医务人员对乳腺 X 线摄影潜在获益和危害的讨论:“噢,还有危害?”
J Health Commun. 2020 Dec 1;25(12):951-961. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
3
Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy.采用混合方法并与多个利益相关者合作,为健康素养有限的女性开发乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具提供信息。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 20;6(2):23814683211033249. doi: 10.1177/23814683211033249. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
4
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Are Providers Prepared to Engage Younger Women in Shared Decision-Making for Mammography?医务人员是否准备好让年轻女性参与乳腺癌 X 光筛查的共同决策?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;27(1):24-31. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6047. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Modifying a Mammography Decision Aid for Older Adult Women with Risk Factors for Low Health Literacy.为有低健康素养风险因素的老年成年女性修改乳腺 X 线摄影决策辅助工具。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Apr;5(2):e78-e90. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210308-01. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacy.审计反馈与额外的医生沟通培训对改善健康素养有限患者癌症筛查的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1113-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2782-4. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
8
Patient, primary care provider, and stakeholder perspectives on mammography screening frequency: lessons learned from a qualitative study.患者、初级保健提供者和利益相关者对乳房 X 光筛查频率的看法:来自定性研究的经验教训。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09900-x.
9
Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey.考虑乳腺癌筛查的女性共同决策的核心要素:改良德尔菲调查结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1668-1677. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Primary Care Physicians' Support of Shared Decision Making for Different Cancer Screening Decisions.初级保健医生对不同癌症筛查决策中共同决策的支持。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):70-78. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16660547. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.初级保健中不同种族和/或族裔人群的共同决策:障碍与促进因素的范围综述
Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):108-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.240087.
2
Information needs for cancer screening and associated factors of information-seeking behaviour: a qualitative systematic review.癌症筛查的信息需求及信息寻求行为的相关因素:一项定性系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):3606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21096-2.
3
Analyzing the Effectiveness of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Gemini.分析人工智能生成的患者教育材料的有效性:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 25;16(11):e74398. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74398. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health.决策能力:健康素养、情境因素与健康之间缺失的一环
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e213-e223. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220718-01. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Feasibility and Acceptability of Personalized Breast Cancer Screening (DECIDO Study): A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial.基于个体的乳腺癌筛查的可行性和可接受性(DECIDO 研究):一项单臂概念验证试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 21;19(16):10426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610426.
6
Women's Understandings and Misunderstandings of Breast Density and Related Concepts: A Mixed Methods Study.女性对乳腺密度及相关概念的理解和误解:一项混合方法研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):983-990. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0343. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy.采用混合方法并与多个利益相关者合作,为健康素养有限的女性开发乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具提供信息。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 20;6(2):23814683211033249. doi: 10.1177/23814683211033249. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
8
Stakeholder Engagement in Adoption, Implementation, and Sustainment of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Increase Mammography Adherence Among Low-Income Women.利益相关者参与采用、实施和维持一项基于证据的干预措施,以提高低收入妇女的乳房 X 光检查依从性。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1486-1495. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01988-2. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?".健康素养有限的患者和医务人员对乳腺 X 线摄影潜在获益和危害的讨论:“噢,还有危害?”
J Health Commun. 2020 Dec 1;25(12):951-961. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Influencing Implementation Of Shared Medical Decision Making In Patients With Cancer.影响癌症患者共同医疗决策实施的因素
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Nov 27;13:1995-2005. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S217561. eCollection 2019.
2
Predictors of Women's Awareness of the Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening and Associations with Confusion, Ambivalence, and Information Seeking.女性对乳腺钼靶筛查利弊的认知预测因素以及与困惑、矛盾心理和信息寻求的关联
Health Commun. 2021 Mar;36(3):303-314. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1687129. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
4
Scrutinizing screening: a critical interpretive review of primary care provider perspectives on mammography decision-making with average-risk women.审视筛查:对初级保健提供者关于与平均风险女性进行乳房X光检查决策观点的批判性解释性综述
Public Health Rev. 2018 Apr 23;39:15. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0092-9. eCollection 2018.
5
Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Call for Development and Validation of Patient-Oriented Shared Decision-Making Tools.基层医疗中的乳腺癌筛查:呼吁开发和验证以患者为中心的共同决策工具。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Feb;28(2):114-116. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6775. Epub 2018 May 14.
6
Breast Cancer Screening in 2018: Time for Shared Decision Making.2018年乳腺癌筛查:是时候进行共同决策了。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1814-1815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3388.
7
Explaining between-race differences in African-American and European-American women's responses to breast density notification.解释非裔美国女性和欧裔美国女性对乳房密度通知的反应存在种族差异的原因。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;195:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
Shared Decision Making Interventions: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence with Implications for Health Literacy.共同决策干预措施:理论与实证证据及其对健康素养的启示
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:263-283.
9
Are Providers Prepared to Engage Younger Women in Shared Decision-Making for Mammography?医务人员是否准备好让年轻女性参与乳腺癌 X 光筛查的共同决策?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;27(1):24-31. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6047. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Following Guideline Changes: Results of a National Survey.指南变更后医生对乳腺癌筛查的建议:一项全国性调查结果
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):877-878. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0453.

参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。

Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2
PMID:32935318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042081/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited health literacy is a driver of cancer disparities and associated with less participation in medical decisions. Mammography screening decisions are an exemplar of where health literacy may impact decision-making and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe informational needs and shared decision-making (SDM) experiences among women ages 40-54 who have limited health literacy and primary care providers (PCPs).

DESIGN

Qualitative, in-depth interviews explored experiences with mammography counseling and SDM.

PARTICIPANTS

Women ages 40-54 with limited health literacy and no history of breast cancer or mammogram in the prior 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a Boston academic, safety-net hospital. PCPs practicing at this site were eligible for PCP interviews.

APPROACH

Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A set of deductive codes for each stakeholder group was developed based on literature and the interview guide. Inductive codes were generated during codebook development. Codes were compared within and across patient and PCP interviews to create themes relevant to mammography decision-making.

KEY RESULTS

The average age of 25 interviewed patients was 46.5; 18 identified as black, 3 as Hispanic, 2 as non-Hispanic white, and 2 had no recorded race or ethnicity. Of 20 PCPs, 15 were female; 12 had practiced for >5 years. Patients described a lack of technical (appropriate tests and what they do) and process (what happens during a mammogram visit) knowledge, viewing these as necessary for decision-making. PCPs were reluctant to engage patients with limited health literacy in SDM due to time constraints and feared that increased information might confuse patients or deter them from having mammograms. Both groups felt pre-visit education would facilitate mammography-related SDM during clinical visits.

CONCLUSION

Both patients and PCPs perceived a need for tools to relay technical and process knowledge about mammography prior to clinical encounters to address the scope of information that patients with limited health literacy desired.

摘要

背景

健康素养有限是导致癌症差异的因素之一,并且与较少参与医疗决策有关。乳房 X 光筛查决策是健康素养可能影响决策和结果的一个范例。

目的

描述健康素养有限的 40-54 岁女性和初级保健提供者 (PCP) 的信息需求和共享决策 (SDM) 体验。

设计

定性、深入访谈探讨了乳房 X 光检查咨询和 SDM 的经验。

参与者

在波士顿一所学术性、保障性医院的初级保健就诊前,接近了年龄在 40-54 岁且健康素养有限、过去 9 个月内没有乳腺癌或乳房 X 光检查史的女性。在该地点执业的 PCP 有资格接受 PCP 访谈。

方法

访谈进行了录音,并逐字转录。根据文献和访谈指南,为每个利益相关者群体制定了一套演绎代码。在代码手册开发过程中生成了归纳代码。在患者和 PCP 访谈中比较了代码,以创建与乳房 X 光决策相关的主题。

主要结果

接受访谈的 25 名患者的平均年龄为 46.5 岁;18 人被认定为黑人,3 人为西班牙裔,2 人为非西班牙裔白人,2 人没有记录种族或族裔。在 20 名 PCP 中,有 15 名是女性;12 人从业超过 5 年。患者描述了缺乏技术(适当的检查和检查的内容)和流程(乳房 X 光检查就诊期间发生的事情)知识,他们认为这些是决策所必需的。PCP 由于时间限制而不愿意让健康素养有限的患者参与 SDM,并担心增加信息可能会使患者感到困惑或阻止他们进行乳房 X 光检查。两组都认为,在临床就诊前进行教育将有助于在临床就诊期间进行与乳房 X 光相关的 SDM。

结论

患者和 PCP 都认为需要在临床就诊前提供有关乳房 X 光的技术和流程知识的工具,以解决健康素养有限的患者所需的信息范围。