Suppr超能文献

皮肤镜检查:采用交叉偏振,还是不采用交叉偏振,这是个问题。

Dermoscopy: to cross-polarize, or not to cross-polarize, that is the question.

作者信息

Lake Amy, Jones Bolette

机构信息

Cardiff University, Clinical Photography, School of Healthcare Sciences , Ty Dewi Sant, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4XN United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vis Commun Med. 2015 Jun;38(1-2):36-50. doi: 10.3109/17453054.2015.1046371.

Abstract

Dermoscopy is a non-invasive technique that visualizes the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin, identifying features that are not evident to the naked eye, making it a useful diagnostic technique in differentiating between benign and malignant skin lesions. There are two methods of dermoscopy, non-polarized and cross-polarized; both are perceived to give visual differences in lesion characteristics. The aim of this literature review is to identify the advantages and limitations between non-polarized, cross-polarized and also contact and non-contact techniques. This research confirms that there are similarities, as well as differences, in the visualization of lesions between non-polarized and cross-polarized dermoscopy. Non-polarized dermoscopy reveals superficial features and polarized dermoscopy shows deeper structures, concluding that the use of both methods can provide complementary information.

摘要

皮肤镜检查是一种非侵入性技术,可观察皮肤的表皮层和真皮层,识别肉眼无法察觉的特征,使其成为鉴别良性和恶性皮肤病变的有用诊断技术。皮肤镜检查有两种方法,即非偏振光和交叉偏振光;两者在病变特征上均呈现出视觉差异。本综述的目的是确定非偏振光、交叉偏振光以及接触式和非接触式技术之间的优缺点。该研究证实,非偏振光和交叉偏振光皮肤镜检查在病变可视化方面既有相似之处,也有不同之处。非偏振光皮肤镜检查可显示浅表特征,偏振光皮肤镜检查则可显示更深层结构,得出结论:两种方法结合使用可提供互补信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验