美国国家癌症研究所减少癌症健康差距的社区网络计划倡议：成果与经验教训
The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned.
作者信息
Braun Kathryn L, Stewart Susan, Baquet Claudia, Berry-Bobovski Lisa, Blumenthal Daniel, Brandt Heather M, Buchwald Dedra S, Campbell Janis E, Coe Kathryn, Cooper Leslie C, Espinoza Paula, Henry-Tillman Ronda, Hargreaves Margaret, James Aimee, Salmon Kaur Judith, Viswanath K, Ma Grace X, Mandelblatt Jeanne, Meade Cathy, Ramirez Amelie, Scarinci Isabel, Park Tanjasiri Sora, Thompson Beti, Vines Anissa I, Dignan Mark
出版信息
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015;9 Suppl(0):21-32. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0017.
BACKGROUND
We describe reach, partnerships, products, benefits, and lessons learned of the 25 Community Network Programs (CNPs) that applied community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce cancer health disparities.
METHODS
Quantitative and qualitative data were abstracted from CNP final reports. Qualitative data were grouped by theme.
RESULTS
Together, the 25 CNPs worked with more than 2,000 academic, clinical, community, government, faith-based, and other partners. They completed 211 needs assessments, leveraged funds for 328 research and service projects, trained 719 new investigators, educated almost 55,000 community members, and published 991 articles. Qualitative data illustrated how use of CBPR improved research methods and participation; improved knowledge, interventions, and outcomes; and built community capacity. Lessons learned related to the need for time to nurture partnerships and the need to attend to community demand for sustained improvements in cancer services.
IMPLICATIONS
Findings demonstrate the value of government-supported, community-academic, CBPR partnerships in cancer prevention and control research.
背景
我们描述了25个社区网络项目（CNP）的覆盖范围、合作伙伴关系、产品、益处以及经验教训，这些项目应用基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）来减少癌症健康差距。
方法
从CNP最终报告中提取定量和定性数据。定性数据按主题分组。
结果
25个CNP共同与2000多个学术、临床、社区、政府、基于信仰的及其他合作伙伴合作。它们完成了211项需求评估，为328个研究和服务项目筹集了资金，培训了719名新研究人员，教育了近55000名社区成员，并发表了991篇文章。定性数据说明了CBPR的使用如何改进研究方法和参与度；如何改善知识、干预措施和结果；以及如何建设社区能力。经验教训涉及培养合作伙伴关系所需的时间以及关注社区对持续改善癌症服务的需求。
启示
研究结果证明了政府支持的社区 - 学术CBPR伙伴关系在癌症预防和控制研究中的价值。
Zotero 插件