• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying moderators of the adherence-outcome relation in cognitive therapy for depression.识别抑郁症认知疗法中依从性与治疗结果关系的调节因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):976-84. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000045. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
A session-to-session examination of homework engagement in cognitive therapy for depression: Do patients experience immediate benefits?对抑郁症认知疗法中家庭作业参与度的逐次检查:患者是否能获得即时益处?
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Sep;72:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
The therapeutic alliance and therapist adherence as predictors of dropout from cognitive therapy for depression when combined with antidepressant medication.当与抗抑郁药物联合使用时,治疗联盟和治疗师的依从性作为抑郁症认知治疗中退出治疗的预测因素。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;50:113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
4
Interpersonal Factors Are Associated with Lower Therapist Adherence in Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Panic Disorder.在惊恐障碍的认知行为疗法中,人际因素与治疗师较低的依从性相关。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 May;23(3):272-84. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1955. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
The process of change in cognitive therapy for depression when combined with antidepressant medication: Predictors of early intersession symptom gains.当认知疗法结合抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症时的变化过程:早期会话症状改善的预测因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):730-8. doi: 10.1037/a0029281. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
6
Therapist empathy, homework compliance, and outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: partitioning within- and between-therapist effects.治疗师共情、家庭作业依从性与广泛性焦虑障碍认知行为治疗的结果:在治疗师内和治疗师间效应中的划分。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2017 Sep;46(5):375-390. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1253605. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Therapist use of Socratic questioning predicts session-to-session symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression.治疗师使用苏格拉底式提问可预测抑郁症认知疗法中逐次治疗间的症状变化。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jul;70:32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Therapist competence in cognitive therapy for depression: predicting subsequent symptom change.治疗师在抑郁症认知治疗中的胜任力:预测随后的症状变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):429-37. doi: 10.1037/a0019631.
9
Enthusiasm for homework and improvement of psychological distress in subthreshold depression during behavior therapy: secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.行为疗法期间阈下抑郁症患者对家庭作业的热情及心理困扰的改善:一项随机对照试验数据的二次分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 25;15:302. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0687-3.
10
Client characteristics as moderators of the relation between the therapeutic alliance and outcome in cognitive therapy for depression.作为抑郁症认知治疗中治疗联盟与治疗结果关系调节因素的来访者特征
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):368-73. doi: 10.1037/a0035994. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Is adherence to dialectic behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cognitive processing therapy related to treatment outcome in PTSD after childhood abuse?创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者是否坚持辩证行为疗法(DBT)和认知加工疗法(CPT)与儿童期虐待后 PTSD 的治疗结果相关?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2260293. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2260293. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
2
Revealing subgroup-specific mechanisms of change via moderated mediation: A meditation intervention example.通过调节中介揭示亚组特定的变化机制:冥想干预示例。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Jan;92(1):44-53. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000842. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Identifying active ingredients in cognitive-behavioral therapies: What if we didn't?识别认知行为疗法中的有效成分:如果我们不这样做会怎样?
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Sep;168:104365. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104365. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
4
When Are Therapists' Efforts to Bring about Cognitive Change Effective? Considering Interpersonal Vulnerabilities as Contextual Factors.治疗师促使认知改变的努力何时会有效?将人际脆弱性视为背景因素加以考量。
Int J Cogn Ther. 2021 Dec;14(4):623-638. doi: 10.1007/s41811-021-00117-7. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
5
Disentangling Trait-Like Between-Individual vs. State-Like Within-Individual Effects in Studying the Mechanisms of Change in CBT.在研究认知行为疗法(CBT)的改变机制中,厘清个体间特质样效应与个体内状态样效应
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 21;11:609585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.609585. eCollection 2020.
6
The Temporal Associations of Therapeutic Alliance and Manual Adherence With Depressive Symptom Change in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adult Outpatient Major Depression.成人门诊重度抑郁症认知行为治疗中治疗联盟和手册依从性与抑郁症状变化的时间关联
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 13;11:602294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602294. eCollection 2020.
7
On the Road to Personalized Psychotherapy: A Research Agenda Based on Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression.通往个性化心理治疗之路:基于认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的研究议程。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 8;11:607508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607508. eCollection 2020.
8
A Propensity Score Analysis of Homework Adherence-Outcome Relations in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression.一项关于家庭作业依从性-结局关系的倾向评分分析在抑郁症认知行为治疗中的应用
Behav Ther. 2019 Mar;50(2):285-299. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Do changes in trauma-related beliefs predict PTSD symptom improvement in prolonged exposure and sertraline?创伤相关信念的改变是否能预测延长暴露疗法和舍曲林治疗中创伤后应激障碍症状的改善?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;85(9):873-882. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000220. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
It's complicated: The relation between cognitive change procedures, cognitive change, and symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression.情况很复杂:认知疗法治疗抑郁症时认知改变程序、认知改变与症状改变之间的关系。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;41:3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A re-examination of process-outcome relations in cognitive therapy for depression: Disaggregating within-patient and between-patient effects.抑郁症认知疗法中治疗过程与治疗结果关系的再审视:区分患者内部和患者之间的效应
Psychother Res. 2016 Jul;26(4):387-98. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1026423. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
2
Client characteristics as moderators of the relation between the therapeutic alliance and outcome in cognitive therapy for depression.作为抑郁症认知治疗中治疗联盟与治疗结果关系调节因素的来访者特征
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):368-73. doi: 10.1037/a0035994. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
3
Understanding processes of change: how some patients reveal more than others-and some groups of therapists less-about what matters in psychotherapy.理解变化过程:为什么有些患者比其他患者更愿意透露心理治疗中重要的事情,以及为什么有些治疗师群体比其他群体更不愿意透露。
Psychother Res. 2014;24(3):419-28. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.838654. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Pretreatment anxiety predicts patterns of change in cognitive behavioral therapy and medications for depression.治疗前的焦虑可预测认知行为疗法和抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症的模式变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Oct;81(5):774-82. doi: 10.1037/a0032985. Epub 2013 May 6.
5
The process of change in cognitive therapy for depression when combined with antidepressant medication: Predictors of early intersession symptom gains.当认知疗法结合抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症时的变化过程:早期会话症状改善的预测因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):730-8. doi: 10.1037/a0029281. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
6
Predictors of patient cognitive therapy skills and symptom change in two randomized clinical trials: the role of therapist adherence and the therapeutic alliance.在两项随机临床试验中预测患者认知疗法技能和症状变化的因素:治疗师的依从性和治疗联盟的作用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Jun;80(3):373-81. doi: 10.1037/a0027663. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
7
Outcomes of acute phase cognitive therapy in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression.焦虑与非焦虑抑郁门诊患者急性期认知治疗的结局。
Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(3):153-60. doi: 10.1159/000334909. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
Does pretreatment severity moderate the efficacy of psychological treatment of adult outpatient depression? A meta-analysis.预处理严重程度是否会影响成人门诊抑郁症的心理治疗效果?一项荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):668-80. doi: 10.1037/a0020570.
9
Therapist competence in cognitive therapy for depression: predicting subsequent symptom change.治疗师在抑郁症认知治疗中的胜任力:预测随后的症状变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):429-37. doi: 10.1037/a0019631.
10
The process of change in cognitive therapy for depression: predictors of early inter-session symptom gains.抑郁症认知治疗中的变化过程:预测早期会话间症状改善的因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Jul;48(7):599-606. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

识别抑郁症认知疗法中依从性与治疗结果关系的调节因素。

Identifying moderators of the adherence-outcome relation in cognitive therapy for depression.

作者信息

Sasso Katherine E, Strunk Daniel R, Braun Justin D, DeRubeis Robert J, Brotman Melissa A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University.

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):976-84. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000045. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000045
PMID:26214542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4573357/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the influence of patients' pretreatment characteristics on the adherence-outcome relation in cognitive therapy (CT) for depression. In a sample of 57 depressed adults participating in CT, the authors examined interactions between pretreatment patient characteristics and therapist adherence in predicting session-to-session symptom change.

METHOD

Using items from the Collaborative Study Psychotherapy Rating Scale, the authors assessed 3 facets of therapist adherence: cognitive methods, negotiating/structuring, and behavioral methods/homework. Two graduate students rated Sessions 1-4 for adherence. Symptoms were assessed prior to each session with the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Moderators were assessed as part of patients' intake evaluations.

RESULTS

After correcting for multiple comparisons, patient gender remained a significant moderator of the relationship between cognitive methods and next-session symptom change; cognitive methods more strongly predicted greater symptom improvement for women as compared to men. Pretreatment anxiety and number of prior depressive episodes were significant moderators of the relationship between behavioral methods/homework and next-session symptom change, with greater behavioral methods/homework predicting symptom improvement more strongly among patients high in pretreatment anxiety and among patients with relatively few prior depressive episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to provide evidence of how therapist adherence is differentially related to outcome among depressed patients with different characteristics. If replicated, these findings may inform clinical decisions regarding the use of specific facets of adherence in CT for depression with specific patients.

摘要

目的

关于患者治疗前特征对抑郁症认知疗法(CT)中依从性与治疗效果关系的影响,人们了解甚少。在一个由57名参与CT治疗的成年抑郁症患者组成的样本中,作者研究了治疗前患者特征与治疗师依从性之间的相互作用,以预测逐次治疗期间症状的变化。

方法

作者使用合作研究心理治疗评定量表中的项目,评估了治疗师依从性的三个方面:认知方法、协商/结构化以及行为方法/家庭作业。两名研究生对第1至4次治疗的依从性进行了评分。每次治疗前用贝克抑郁量表第二版评估症状。作为患者入院评估的一部分,对调节变量进行了评估。

结果

在对多重比较进行校正后,患者性别仍然是认知方法与下一次治疗症状变化之间关系的显著调节变量;与男性相比,认知方法对女性症状改善的预测作用更强。治疗前焦虑和既往抑郁发作次数是行为方法/家庭作业与下一次治疗症状变化之间关系的显著调节变量,在治疗前焦虑程度高的患者以及既往抑郁发作次数相对较少的患者中,更多的行为方法/家庭作业对症状改善的预测作用更强。

结论

这是第一项提供证据表明治疗师依从性如何与不同特征的抑郁症患者的治疗效果存在差异关联的研究。如果这些发现得到重复验证,可能会为针对特定患者在抑郁症CT治疗中使用依从性的特定方面提供临床决策依据。