• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes of acute phase cognitive therapy in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression.焦虑与非焦虑抑郁门诊患者急性期认知治疗的结局。
Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(3):153-60. doi: 10.1159/000334909. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
2
Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report.伴有焦虑的门诊抑郁症患者与无焦虑抑郁症患者治疗结果的差异:一项STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;165(3):342-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111868. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
3
Cognitive therapy for depressed adults with comorbid social phobia.针对患有共病社交恐惧症的成年抑郁症患者的认知疗法。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
4
Prevalence and treatment outcome in anxious versus nonanxious depression: results from the German Algorithm Project.焦虑与非焦虑抑郁的患病率和治疗结局:来自德国算法项目的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;71(8):1047-54. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05650blu. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
5
Anxiety symptoms among remitted depressed outpatients: prevalence and association with quality of life and psychosocial functioning.缓解期抑郁门诊患者的焦虑症状:患病率及与生活质量和心理社会功能的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Oct;151(1):401-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
6
Reliability and validity of the DSM-5 Anxious Distress Specifier Interview.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版焦虑痛苦特征访谈的信度与效度
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;76:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Difference in remission in a Chinese population with anxious versus nonanxious treatment-resistant depression: a report of OPERATION study.中国伴有焦虑与不伴焦虑的治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者缓解率的差异:OPERATION 研究报告。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):834-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
8
Effect of baseline anxious depression on initial and sustained antidepressant response to ketamine.基线焦虑抑郁对氯胺酮初始及持续抗抑郁反应的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;75(9):e932-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09049.
9
Cognitive therapy for anxious depression in STAR(*) D: what have we learned?焦虑抑郁的认知治疗:STAR(*) D 研究告诉了我们什么?
J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 15;142(1-3):213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
10
Estimating outcome probabilities from early symptom changes in cognitive therapy for recurrent depression.从认知疗法治疗复发性抑郁症的早期症状变化中估计结局概率。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;87(6):510-520. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000409. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effects of tDCS on depressive and anxiety symptoms from a transdiagnostic perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.从跨诊断角度评估 tDCS 对抑郁和焦虑症状的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 18;14(1):295. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03003-w.
2
Prevalence and correlates of severe anxiety in patients with first hospitalization for major depressive disorder combined with dyslipidemia: a large sample cross-sectional study.首次因重度抑郁症合并血脂异常住院患者中重度焦虑的患病率及其相关因素:一项大样本横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 17;14:1289614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1289614. eCollection 2023.
3
Association between depression and endometriosis using data from NHANES 2005-2006.使用 NHANES 2005-2006 数据探讨抑郁与子宫内膜异位症的关系。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46005-2.
4
Neuromodulation Treatments of Pathological Anxiety in Anxiety Disorders, Stressor-Related Disorders, and Major Depressive Disorder: A Dimensional Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.焦虑症、应激源相关障碍和重度抑郁症中病理性焦虑的神经调节治疗:一项维度系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 1;13:910897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.910897. eCollection 2022.
5
Anxious depression as a clinically relevant subtype of pediatric major depressive disorder.焦虑抑郁是儿科重性抑郁障碍的一种具有临床意义的亚型。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019 Sep;126(9):1217-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02069-x. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
6
The Role of Dyadic Discord in Outcomes in Acute Phase Cognitive Therapy for Adults With Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder.双元不和谐在复发性重度抑郁症成人急性期认知治疗结局中的作用。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jul;50(4):778-790. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
7
A machine learning ensemble to predict treatment outcomes following an Internet intervention for depression.机器学习集成模型预测抑郁症互联网干预治疗后的结果。
Psychol Med. 2019 Oct;49(14):2330-2341. doi: 10.1017/S003329171800315X. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Do comorbid social and other anxiety disorders predict outcomes during and after cognitive therapy for depression?共病社会焦虑障碍和其他焦虑障碍是否会预测抑郁认知治疗期间和之后的结果?
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.053. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
9
Using patient self-reports to study heterogeneity of treatment effects in major depressive disorder.利用患者自我报告研究重度抑郁症治疗效果的异质性。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Feb;26(1):22-36. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000020. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Predictors of Response to Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With High-Intensity Face-to-Face Therapist Guidance for Depression: A Bayesian Analysis.针对抑郁症的高强度面对面治疗师指导下的基于网络的认知行为疗法反应的预测因素:贝叶斯分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Sep 2;17(9):e197. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4351.

本文引用的文献

1
Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients' choice arm.在抑郁的初级保健患者中,针对血清素抗抑郁药和认知行为疗法的治疗偏好是否相关?一项包括患者选择臂的随机对照试验的结果。
Psychother Psychosom. 2011;80(1):39-47. doi: 10.1159/000318772. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
2
Prevalence and treatment outcome in anxious versus nonanxious depression: results from the German Algorithm Project.焦虑与非焦虑抑郁的患病率和治疗结局:来自德国算法项目的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;71(8):1047-54. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05650blu. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
3
Comparative efficacy and durability of continuation phase cognitive therapy for preventing recurrent depression: design of a double-blinded, fluoxetine- and pill placebo-controlled, randomized trial with 2-year follow-up.预防复发性抑郁的延续阶段认知治疗的比较疗效和持久性:一项为期 2 年随访的双盲、氟西汀和安慰剂对照、随机试验的设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Jul;31(4):355-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 6.
4
New modalities of assessment and treatment planning in depression: the sequential approach.抑郁的新评估和治疗规划模式:序贯方法。
CNS Drugs. 2010 Jun;24(6):453-65. doi: 10.2165/11531580-000000000-00000.
5
Subtyping major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症的亚型分类
Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):131-5. doi: 10.1159/000286957. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
6
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent relapse in recurrent depression.基于正念的认知疗法预防复发性抑郁症的复发
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):966-78. doi: 10.1037/a0013786.
7
Cognitive therapy for depressed adults with comorbid social phobia.针对患有共病社交恐惧症的成年抑郁症患者的认知疗法。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
8
Psychic and somatic anxiety symptoms as predictors of response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.精神性和躯体性焦虑症状作为重度抑郁症患者对氟西汀反应的预测指标
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Oct 30;161(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
9
How much cognitive therapy, for which patients, will prevent depressive relapse?多少认知疗法、针对哪些患者能够预防抑郁症复发?
J Affect Disord. 2008 Dec;111(2-3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
10
Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report.伴有焦虑的门诊抑郁症患者与无焦虑抑郁症患者治疗结果的差异:一项STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;165(3):342-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111868. Epub 2008 Jan 2.

焦虑与非焦虑抑郁门诊患者急性期认知治疗的结局。

Outcomes of acute phase cognitive therapy in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dedman College, PO Box 750442, Dallas, TX 75275, USA.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(3):153-60. doi: 10.1159/000334909. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1159/000334909
PMID:22398963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3362240/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compared to nonanxious depressed patients, anxious depressed patients respond less to pharmacotherapy, prompting consideration of alternate treatments. Based on the transdiagnostic principles of cognitive therapy (CT), we predicted that anxious depressed patients would respond as well to CT as nonanxious depressed patients.

METHOD

Adults (n = 523) with recurrent major depressive disorder received 12-14 weeks of CT as part of the Continuation Phase Cognitive Therapy Relapse Prevention Trial. Anxious depressed patients (n = 264; 50.4%) were compared to nonanxious depressed patients (n = 259; 49.6%) on demographic variables, initial severity, attrition, and rates and patterns of response and remission.

RESULTS

Anxious depressed patients presented with greater illness severity and had significantly lower response (55.3 vs. 68.3%) and remission rates (26.9 vs. 40.2%) based on clinician-administered measures. By contrast, smaller between-group differences for attrition, and for response (59.1 vs. 64.9%) and remission (41.7 vs. 48.7%) rates on self-report measures were not significant. Further, anxious depressed patients had greater speed of improvement on self-reported anxiety symptom severity and clinician-rated depressive and anxiety symptom severity measures.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with prior reports, anxious depressed patients presented with greater severity and, following CT, had lower response and remission rates on clinician-administered scales. However, anxious depressed patients improved more rapidly and response and remission rates on self-report measures were not significantly different from nonanxious depressed patients. Our findings suggest that anxious depressed patients may simply need additional time or more CT sessions to reach outcomes fully comparable to those of less anxious patients.

摘要

目的

与非焦虑抑郁患者相比,焦虑抑郁患者对药物治疗的反应较差,这促使人们考虑采用替代疗法。基于认知疗法(CT)的跨诊断原则,我们预测焦虑抑郁患者对 CT 的反应与非焦虑抑郁患者一样好。

方法

作为延续阶段认知治疗预防复发试验的一部分,患有复发性重度抑郁症的成年人(n = 523)接受了 12-14 周的 CT。将焦虑抑郁患者(n = 264;50.4%)与非焦虑抑郁患者(n = 259;49.6%)进行比较,比较的指标包括人口统计学变量、初始严重程度、脱落率,以及反应和缓解的速度和模式。

结果

焦虑抑郁患者的疾病严重程度更高,根据临床医生评估的指标,他们的反应率(55.3%对 68.3%)和缓解率(26.9%对 40.2%)明显较低。相比之下,基于自我报告的指标,两组间的脱落率差异较小,反应率(59.1%对 64.9%)和缓解率(41.7%对 48.7%)差异也不显著。此外,焦虑抑郁患者在自我报告的焦虑症状严重程度和临床医生评估的抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度的测量指标上,改善速度更快。

结论

与之前的报告一致,焦虑抑郁患者的严重程度更高,在接受 CT 治疗后,根据临床医生评估的量表,他们的反应率和缓解率较低。然而,焦虑抑郁患者在自我报告的量表上的改善速度更快,且反应率和缓解率与非焦虑抑郁患者没有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,焦虑抑郁患者可能只是需要额外的时间或更多的 CT 疗程,才能达到与非焦虑患者完全可比的结果。