• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项内隐态度任务中,联合行动改变了基于效价的行动编码。

Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.

作者信息

Stenzel Anna, Liepelt Roman

机构信息

Institute for Psychology, University of Muenster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):889-903. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7
PMID:26215432
Abstract

Recent studies suggest that co-acting with another person induces a problem to discriminate between one's own and the other's actions which can be resolved by emphasizing action features that discriminate best between both persons' actions in a given task context. Mostly, overt action features like the spatial position of responses have been suggested as discriminating action features. In the present study, we tested whether non-externally perceivable, covert action features can be used for resolving the action discrimination problem during joint action. Therefore, we compared task performance between a joint and an individual version of the Go/Nogo Association Task, a task requiring the association of a valence to the response. We found a larger implicit attitude effect in the joint than in the individual setting for person-related (self and other, Experiment 1) as well as for non-person-related attitude objects (fruit and insect, Experiment 2) suggesting that the weight of valence information is increased in the internal coding of responses when valence discriminates between both responses. In contrast, we found a smaller implicit attitude effect in a person present setting than an individual setting (Experiment 3) indicating that the enhanced implicit attitude effect observed in the joint settings of Experiments 1 and 2 is not due to social facilitation. Our results suggest that action discrimination during joint action can rely on covert action features. The results are in line with the referential coding account, and specify the kind of action features that are represented when sharing a task with another person.

摘要

最近的研究表明,与他人共同行动会引发一个问题,即难以区分自己和他人的行动,而在给定的任务情境中,通过强调能最好地区分两人行动的动作特征,可以解决这个问题。大多数情况下,像反应的空间位置等明显的动作特征被认为是区分行动的特征。在本研究中,我们测试了不可从外部感知的隐蔽动作特征是否可用于解决联合行动中的行动区分问题。因此,我们比较了Go/Nogo联想任务的联合版和个体版之间的任务表现,这是一个要求将效价与反应相联系的任务。我们发现,对于与人物相关的(自我和他人,实验1)以及与非人物相关的态度对象(水果和昆虫,实验2),联合情境中的内隐态度效应比个体情境中的更大,这表明当效价在两种反应之间进行区分时,效价信息在反应的内部编码中的权重会增加。相比之下,我们发现有人在场情境中的内隐态度效应比个体情境中的更小(实验3),这表明在实验1和2的联合情境中观察到的增强的内隐态度效应不是由于社会促进作用。我们的结果表明,联合行动中的行动区分可以依赖于隐蔽动作特征。这些结果与参照编码理论相符,并明确了与他人共享任务时所表征的动作特征的类型。

相似文献

1
Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.在一项内隐态度任务中,联合行动改变了基于效价的行动编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):889-903. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
2
Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.你真的代表我的任务吗?对意外事件的序列适应效应支持联合西蒙效应的参照编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account.非社会性西蒙效应:一种参照编码解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1248-60. doi: 10.1037/a0031031. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
4
Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.参照编码不依赖于位置特征:非空间联合西蒙效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):186-95. doi: 10.1037/a0038548. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
5
A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task.自我与他人互动中的一种常见编码框架:来自联合行动任务的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Nov;175(2):353-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0557-9. Epub 2006 Jun 24.
6
Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals.双峰:一项关于协同行动个体的动作规划与控制的事件相关电位研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 May;18(5):859-70. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859.
7
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
8
Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.成功的障碍:物理隔离可优化共享工作区中的事件文件检索。
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1158-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0886-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
9
Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.联合行动规划中的注意力分配与任务表征
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2275-86. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00634. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.协作者注意力焦点对任务表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1404-15. doi: 10.1037/a0027523. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Social affiliation is sufficient to provoke the partner-advantage.社会关系足以引发伴侣优势。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25052-1.
2
Saliency at first sight: instant identity referential advantage toward a newly met partner.一见钟情时的显著性:对新结识伴侣的即时身份参照优势。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Nov 4;4(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0186-z.
3
When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.当社会实验者在个体的简单反应时西蒙任务中覆盖显著物体的效应——一项事件相关电位研究

本文引用的文献

1
Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.参照编码不依赖于位置特征:非空间联合西蒙效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):186-95. doi: 10.1037/a0038548. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
2
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.联合西蒙效应:综述与理论整合。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 5;5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974. eCollection 2014.
3
Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an ideomotor approach.情感行为后果的指令和激励功能:一种观念运动方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674. eCollection 2018.
Psychol Res. 2015 Jul;79(4):630-49. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0590-4. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
Affective compatibility between stimuli and response goals: a primer for a new implicit measure of attitudes.刺激与反应目标之间的情感兼容性:一种新的态度内隐测量方法入门
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 14;8(11):e79210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079210. eCollection 2013.
5
Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.按键与位置:联合空间兼容性效应背后的空间反应编码
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1725-36. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z.
6
The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account.非社会性西蒙效应:一种参照编码解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1248-60. doi: 10.1037/a0031031. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
7
Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm.使用社会双重任务范式来明确社会认知过程。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;6:86. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00086. eCollection 2012.
8
Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.社会西蒙任务中空间显著性的增强:空间兼容性效应的反应编码解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):911-29. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0304-1.
9
Intentional weighting: a basic principle in cognitive control.意图加权:认知控制的基本原则。
Psychol Res. 2013 May;77(3):249-59. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
10
Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm.手交叉版社会西蒙范式中特征整合的影响。
Psychol Res. 2013 Mar;77(2):240-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0425-0. Epub 2012 Feb 17.