• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参照编码不依赖于位置特征:非空间联合西蒙效应的证据。

Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.

机构信息

Institute for Psychological Research, Leiden University.

Research Group: Heterogeneity and Inclusion, Faculty of Human Science, University of Potsdam.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):186-95. doi: 10.1037/a0038548. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1037/a0038548
PMID:25528013
Abstract

The joint Simon effect (JSE) shows that the presence of another agent can change one's representation of one's task and/or action. According to the spatial response coding approach, this is because another person in one's peri-personal space automatically induces the spatial coding of one's own action, which in turn invites spatial stimulus-response priming. According to the referential coding approach, the presence of another person or event creates response conflict, which the actor is assumed to solve by emphasizing response features that discriminate between one's own response and that of the other. The 2 approaches often make the same predictions, but the spatial response coding approach considers spatial location as the only dimension that can drive response coding, whereas the referential coding approach allows for other dimensions as well. To compare these approaches, the authors ran 2 experiments to see whether a nonspatial JSE can be demonstrated. Participants responded to the geometrical shape of a central colored stimulus by pressing a left or right button, while wearing gloves of the same or different color as the stimuli. Participants performed the task individually, either by responding to either stimulus shapes (Experiment 1) or by responding to only 1 of the 2 shapes (Experiment 2), and in the presence of a coactor. Congruence between stimulus and glove color affected performance in the 2-choice and the joint tasks but not in the individual go/no-go task. This demonstration of a nonspatial JSE is inconsistent with the spatial response coding approach but supports the referential coding approach.

摘要

联合西蒙效应(JSE)表明,另一个代理的存在可以改变一个人对自己任务和/或动作的表示。根据空间响应编码方法,这是因为另一个人在一个人的个人空间中自动诱导了自己动作的空间编码,这反过来又邀请了空间刺激-反应启动。根据参照编码方法,另一个人或事件的存在会产生反应冲突,假定行为者通过强调区分自己的反应和他人的反应的反应特征来解决这种冲突。这两种方法通常做出相同的预测,但空间响应编码方法认为空间位置是唯一可以驱动响应编码的维度,而参照编码方法允许其他维度。为了比较这两种方法,作者进行了两项实验,以确定是否可以证明非空间 JSE。参与者通过按下左或右按钮来响应中央彩色刺激的几何形状,同时佩戴与刺激相同或不同颜色的手套。参与者单独执行任务,要么通过响应任意形状(实验 1),要么通过仅响应 2 个形状之一(实验 2),并在有协同者的情况下执行任务。刺激和手套颜色之间的一致性会影响 2 选择和联合任务的表现,但不会影响个体的 Go/No-Go 任务。这种非空间 JSE 的演示与空间响应编码方法不一致,但支持参照编码方法。

相似文献

1
Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.参照编码不依赖于位置特征:非空间联合西蒙效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):186-95. doi: 10.1037/a0038548. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
2
Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.你真的代表我的任务吗?对意外事件的序列适应效应支持联合西蒙效应的参照编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account.非社会性西蒙效应:一种参照编码解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1248-60. doi: 10.1037/a0031031. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
4
Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.社会西蒙任务中空间显著性的增强:空间兼容性效应的反应编码解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):911-29. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0304-1.
5
Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.西蒙效应中非空间刺激特征之间的干扰。
Am J Psychol. 2009 Winter;122(4):431-53.
6
Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.成功的障碍:物理隔离可优化共享工作区中的事件文件检索。
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1158-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0886-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
7
Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.按键与位置:联合空间兼容性效应背后的空间反应编码
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1725-36. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z.
8
Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.在一项内隐态度任务中,联合行动改变了基于效价的行动编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):889-903. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
9
Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.通过视动刺激确定注意和参照编码源对 Simon 效应的优先性。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Mar;48(4):1011-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.025. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
10
The role of attention for the Simon effect.注意对西蒙效应的作用。
Psychol Res. 1993;55(3):208-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00419608.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial Response Discrimination May Elicit a Simon Effect on a Non-Complementary Task.空间反应辨别可能在非互补任务上引发 Simon 效应。
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Feb;131(1):59-73. doi: 10.1177/00315125231215854. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Gender composition of pairs influences joint action effect.配对的性别构成会影响联合行动效果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1122427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122427. eCollection 2023.
3
The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.
共同作用者反应可达性在联合西蒙效应中的作用:工具使用对工作空间的重新映射。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Saccadic eye movements do not trigger a joint Simon effect.扫视眼动不会引发联合 Simon 效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1896-1904. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01639-0.
5
The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.多模态停止信号西蒙效应:表明在停止信号西蒙范式中刺激特征的相关性对事件表征和任务表现的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02011. eCollection 2018.
6
Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson's disease.心智理论与帕金森病中的共同行动
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1320-1337. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0642-0.
7
When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.当社会实验者在个体的简单反应时西蒙任务中覆盖显著物体的效应——一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674. eCollection 2018.
8
No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.在联合 Stroop 任务中没有任务共同表现的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):852-862. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0909-z. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.成功的障碍:物理隔离可优化共享工作区中的事件文件检索。
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1158-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0886-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
10
Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.动作共同表征中的个体差异:并非个人痛苦或亚临床精神病体验,而是性别构成调节联合动作表现。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Feb;234(2):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4475-6. Epub 2015 Nov 2.