Suppr超能文献

单节段腰椎后路椎间融合术中L4-5与L5-S1融合率的比较影像学分析

A Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Rate between L4-5 and L5-S1 in a Single Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Han Sang-Hyun, Hyun Seung-Jae, Jahng Tae-Ahn, Kim Ki-Jeong

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Spine. 2015 Jun;12(2):60-7. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2015.12.2.60. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate radiographic fusion rates at L4-5 and L5-S1 after single level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and evaluate the relationship between fusion rates and preoperative disc slope angle (DSA), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental angle (SA), and pelvic parameters.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent single level PLIF at L4-5 or L5-S1 during May 2003-December 2012 at our institution. 73 patients were finally enrolled. Fusion was assessed by use of the Brantigan-Steffee classification, less than 2mm translation and less than 5° motion on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs. We analyzed the radiographic fusion rates, risk factors, and relationship of fusion rates with DSA, LL, SA, and pelvic parameters.

RESULTS

There were 59 patients (80.8%) in the L4-5 group and 14 (19.2%) in L5-S1 (average follow-up, 34 months). The radiographic fusion rates were 89.8% in the L4-5 group (53/59) and 42.9% in L5-S1 (6/14) (p<0.001).The preoperative DSA was significantly lesser in the L4-5 group than in the L5-S1 group (13.1±8.1° vs. 27.2±6.7°, p<0.001). The LL, SA, and pelvic parameters were not related with radiographic fusion rates in both groups. Risk factors for non-union were not identified between the two groups except for the surgery level (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The radiographic fusion rate at L5-S1 was less than half that at L4-5 after single level PLIF. This may be due to the anatomical and biomechanical differences between the two levels. More vigorous effort to achieve successful fusion at L5-S1 should be considered.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查单节段腰椎后路椎间融合术(PLIF)后L4-5和L5-S1节段的影像学融合率,并评估融合率与术前椎间盘倾斜角(DSA)、腰椎前凸(LL)、节段角(SA)和骨盆参数之间的关系。

方法

我们对2003年5月至2012年12月在我院接受L4-5或L5-S1单节段PLIF手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。最终纳入73例患者。通过Brantigan-Steffee分类、屈伸位侧位X线片上平移小于2mm和活动度小于5°来评估融合情况。我们分析了影像学融合率、危险因素以及融合率与DSA、LL、SA和骨盆参数之间的关系。

结果

L4-5组有59例患者(80.8%),L5-S1组有14例患者(19.2%)(平均随访34个月)。L4-5组的影像学融合率为89.8%(53/59),L5-S1组为42.9%(6/14)(p<0.001)。L4-5组术前DSA明显小于L5-S1组(13.1±8.1°对27.2±6.7°,p<0.001)。两组的LL、SA和骨盆参数与影像学融合率均无相关性。除手术节段外,两组间未发现不融合的危险因素(p<0.001)。

结论

单节段PLIF术后L5-S1的影像学融合率不到L4-5的一半。这可能是由于两个节段在解剖学和生物力学上的差异。应考虑采取更积极的措施以实现L5-S1的成功融合。

相似文献

1
A Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Rate between L4-5 and L5-S1 in a Single Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Korean J Spine. 2015 Jun;12(2):60-7. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2015.12.2.60. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15):1693-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083167.78853.D5.
4
Effect of one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion on global sagittal balance.
Spine J. 2017 Dec;17(12):1794-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):435-440. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16232. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1.
9
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113034.74567.86.

引用本文的文献

2
Advancements in biomaterials and bioactive solutions for lumbar spine fusion cages: Current trends and future perspectives.
Bioact Mater. 2025 Jul 31;53:656-703. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.035. eCollection 2025 Nov.
7
Fusion Assessment of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix: A 2-Year Prospective Study.
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1205-1216. doi: 10.14245/ns.2347032.516. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
8
Radical decompression without fusion for L5 radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis.
J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):278-287. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-62. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
9
Negative Effects of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis on Bone Fusion after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):818-825. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0453. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

3
Difference of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignments between Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013 Feb;53(2):96-101. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.2.96. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):E1101-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181de4f2e.
6
Correlation of pelvic parameters with isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Asian Spine J. 2009 Jun;3(1):21-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2009.3.1.21. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
7
A short report comparing outcomes between L4/L5 and L5/S1 single-level discectomy surgery.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb;23(1):40-2. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b38537.
9
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of fusion with one or two cages.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Oct;90(10):1352-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.21078.
10
Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1311-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0739-1. Epub 2008 Aug 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验