Suppr超能文献

儿童和成人中特定上下文信息的受控检索

Controlled Retrieval of Specific Context Information in Children and Adults.

作者信息

Lorsbach Thomas C, Friehe Mary J, Teten Amy Fair, Reimer Jason F, Armendarez Joseph J

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 2015 Spring;128(1):43-59. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.1.0043.

Abstract

This study adapted a procedure used by Luo and Craik (2009) to examine whether developmental differences exist in the ability to use controlled retrieval processes to access the contextual details of memory representations. Participants from 3 age groups (mean ages 9, 12, and 25 years) were presented with words in 3 study contexts: with a black-and-white picture, with a color picture, or alone without a picture. Six recognition tests were then presented that varied in the demands (high or low) placed on the retrieval of specific contextual information. Each test consisted of a mixture of words that were old targets from 1 study context, distractors (i.e., previously studied words from a different context), and completely new words. A high-specificity and a low-specificity test list was paired with each test question, with high and low specificity being determined by the nature of the distractors used in a test list. High-specificity tests contained words that were studied in similar contexts: old targets (e.g., words studied with black-and-white pictures) and distractors (e.g., words studied with color pictures). In contrast, low-specificity tests contained words that were studied in dissimilar contexts: old targets (e.g., words studied with black-and-white pictures) and distractors (e.g., words previously studied without a picture). Relative to low-specificity tests, the retrieval conditions of high-specificity tests were assumed to place greater demands on the controlled access of specific contextual information. Analysis of recollection scores revealed that age differences were present on high-but not low-specificity tests, with the performance of 9-year-olds disproportionately affected by the retrieval demands of high-specificity tests.

摘要

本研究采用了罗和克雷克(2009年)使用的程序,以检验在使用受控检索过程来获取记忆表征的情境细节的能力方面是否存在发育差异。来自3个年龄组(平均年龄分别为9岁、12岁和25岁)的参与者在3种学习情境下呈现单词:伴有黑白图片、伴有彩色图片或无图片单独呈现。然后进行了6次识别测试,这些测试对特定情境信息检索的要求(高或低)各不相同。每次测试都由来自1种学习情境的旧目标单词、干扰项(即来自不同情境的先前学习过的单词)和全新单词混合组成。每个测试问题都配有一个高特异性和一个低特异性测试列表,高特异性和低特异性由测试列表中使用的干扰项的性质决定。高特异性测试包含在相似情境中学习的单词:旧目标(例如,与黑白图片一起学习的单词)和干扰项(例如,与彩色图片一起学习的单词)。相比之下,低特异性测试包含在不同情境中学习的单词:旧目标(例如,与黑白图片一起学习的单词)和干扰项(例如,先前无图片学习的单词)。相对于低特异性测试,高特异性测试的检索条件被认为对特定情境信息的受控访问要求更高。对回忆分数的分析表明,年龄差异出现在高特异性而非低特异性测试中,9岁儿童的表现受高特异性测试检索要求的影响尤为显著。

相似文献

1
Controlled Retrieval of Specific Context Information in Children and Adults.
Am J Psychol. 2015 Spring;128(1):43-59. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.1.0043.
2
Effect of study context on item recollection.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jul;63(7):1318-34. doi: 10.1080/17470210903348613. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
3
Reinstatement of encoding context during recollection: behavioural and neuroimaging evidence of a double dissociation.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 May 1;264:51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.01.033. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Reactivation of context-specific brain regions during retrieval.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.023.
5
Prefrontal activity and diagnostic monitoring of memory retrieval: FMRI of the criterial recollection task.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):135-48. doi: 10.1162/089892906775250049.
6
Modulation of the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval cue processing by the specificity of task demands.
Brain Res. 2006 Feb 3;1071(1):153-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.093. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
7
Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 May;44(5):734-751. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000445. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
8
Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):843-54. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370762.
10
Are There Multiple Kinds of Episodic Memory? An fMRI Investigation Comparing Autobiographical and Recognition Memory Tasks.
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 8;37(10):2764-2775. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1534-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Developmental differences in hippocampal and cortical contributions to episodic retrieval.
Cortex. 2013 Jun;49(6):1482-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
2
The development of neural correlates for memory formation.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Aug;36(7):1708-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
3
How do the different components of episodic memory develop? Role of executive functions and short-term feature-binding abilities.
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):1037-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01736.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
5
A "snapshot" of declarative memory: Differing developmental trajectories in episodic and autobiographical memory.
Memory. 2011 Nov;19(8):825-35. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.613839. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
6
Developmental changes in item and source memory: evidence from an ERP recognition memory study with children, adolescents, and adults.
Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):1638-953. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01642.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
7
Developmental differences in medial temporal lobe function during memory encoding.
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9548-56. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3500-09.2010.
8
Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective.
Brain Res. 2010 Jan 15;1310:124-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.016. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
9
Episodic memory across the lifespan: the contributions of associative and strategic components.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jun;34(7):1080-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
10
Developmental differences in the impact of contextual factors on susceptibility to retroactive interference.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验