Haaker J, Lonsdorf T B, Schümann D, Menz M, Brassen S, Bunzeck N, Gamer M, Kalisch R
Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Biol Psychol. 2015 Oct;111:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
Impaired fear inhibition has been described as a hallmark of pathological anxiety. We aimed at further characterizing the relation between fear inhibition and anxiety by extending previous work to contextual safety stimuli as well as to dimensional scores of trait anxiety in a large sample.
We employed a validated paradigm for context-dependent fear acquisition/extinction (day 1) and retrieval/expression (day 2) in 377 healthy individuals. This large sample size allowed the employment of a dimensional rather than binary approach with respect to individual differences in trait anxiety.
We observed a positive correlation on day 1 between trait anxiety with all CSs that possess an inherent inhibitory component, conveyed either by reliable non-reinforcement of a specific CS in a dangerous context (safe cue) or by the context itself (i.e., safe context). No correlation however was observed for a CS that possesses excitatory (threatening) properties only. These results were observed during fear learning (day 1) for US expectancy and fear ratings but not for SCRs. No such pattern was evident during fear and extinction retrieval/expression (day 2).
We provide further evidence that high trait anxiety is associated with the inability to take immediate advantage of environmental safety cues (cued and contextual), which might represent a promising trans-diagnostic marker for different anxiety disorders. Consequently, the incorporation of methods to optimize inhibitory learning in current cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) treatments might open up a promising avenue for precision medicine in anxiety disorders.
We did not include patients diagnosed with anxiety disorders.
恐惧抑制受损被描述为病理性焦虑的一个标志。我们旨在通过将先前的研究扩展到情境安全刺激以及大样本中特质焦虑的维度评分,进一步刻画恐惧抑制与焦虑之间的关系。
我们采用了一种经过验证的范式,用于377名健康个体的情境依赖性恐惧习得/消退(第1天)以及回忆/表达(第2天)。如此大的样本量使得我们能够针对特质焦虑的个体差异采用维度而非二元的方法。
我们在第1天观察到,特质焦虑与所有具有内在抑制成分的条件刺激之间存在正相关,这些抑制成分要么通过在危险情境中特定条件刺激的可靠非强化(安全线索)来传达,要么通过情境本身(即安全情境)来传达。然而,对于仅具有兴奋性(威胁性)属性的条件刺激,未观察到相关性。这些结果在恐惧学习(第1天)期间对于预期电击和恐惧评分出现,但对于皮肤电反应则未出现。在恐惧和消退回忆/表达(第2天)期间没有明显的这种模式。
我们提供了进一步的证据,表明高特质焦虑与无法立即利用环境安全线索(线索性和情境性)相关,这可能是不同焦虑症一个有前景的跨诊断标志物。因此,在当前认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗中纳入优化抑制性学习的方法,可能为焦虑症的精准医学开辟一条有前景的途径。
我们未纳入被诊断患有焦虑症的患者。