Thurston Meghan D, Cassaday Helen J
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical Psychology, The Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 4;13:866771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866771. eCollection 2022.
Experimental studies of fear conditioning have identified the effectiveness of safety signals in inhibiting fear and maintaining fear-motivated behaviors. In fear conditioning procedures, the presence of safety signals means that the otherwise expected feared outcome will not now occur. Differences in the inhibitory learning processes needed to learn safety are being identified in various psychological and psychiatric conditions. However, despite early theoretical interest, the role of conditioned inhibitors as safety signals in anxiety has been under-investigated to date, in part because of the stringent test procedures required to confirm the demonstration of conditioned inhibition as such. Nonetheless, the theoretical implications of an inhibitory learning perspective continue to influence clinical practice. Moreover, our understanding of safety signals is of additional importance in the context of the increased health anxiety and safety behaviors generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
恐惧条件作用的实验研究已经确定了安全信号在抑制恐惧和维持恐惧驱动行为方面的有效性。在恐惧条件作用程序中,安全信号的存在意味着原本预期的恐惧结果现在不会出现。目前正在各种心理和精神疾病中确定学习安全所需的抑制性学习过程的差异。然而,尽管早期有理论兴趣,但迄今为止,条件性抑制物作为焦虑中安全信号的作用仍未得到充分研究,部分原因是确认条件性抑制的证明需要严格的测试程序。尽管如此,抑制性学习观点的理论影响继续影响着临床实践。此外,在2019年冠状病毒病大流行引发的健康焦虑和安全行为增加的背景下,我们对安全信号的理解具有额外的重要性。