• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[提高对严重创伤早期临床治疗中错误的认识]

[Better apprehension of errors in the early clinical treatment of the severely injured].

作者信息

Trentzsch H, Imach S, Kohlmann T, Urban B, Lazarovici L, Prückner S

机构信息

Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), Klinikum der Universität München, Schillerstr. 53, 80336, München, Deutschland,

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2015 Aug;118(8):675-85. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0029-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-015-0029-4
PMID:26219911
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every year preventable adverse events endanger a considerable number of patients. Current guidelines of the Federal Joint Committee require clinical quality management to provide amongst others an independent clinical risk management and a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). Such guidelines increase the pressure to actively deal with errors, even in emergency medicine. Human error is considered to be the main cause of preventable adverse events in high-risk industries, such as aviation. This observation is gladly directly transferred to clinical medicine.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated where the true causes for preventable adverse events during the resuscitation of severely injured patients can be found.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature search of the PubMed database was performed.

RESULTS

The search identified three recent studies addressing these objectives that revealed human error as the most important cause of preventable adverse events during emergency room resuscitation (88-97%). Errors during resuscitation in the emergency room occur in approximately 10 %. It is striking that such data do not differ greatly from findings described in studies undertaken 20 years ago. One possible explanation might be that the systematic evaluation of medical errors in the emergency room is a weak spot and that too few lessons can be learnt from such incidents. Therefore, this article describes models of error development and outlines methods to collect data for root cause analysis and for clinical risk management. Thus, this review aims at a better understanding of how errors originate and to allow development of strategies to prevent errors from happening again.

CONCLUSION

Human error is the most important cause of preventable adverse events during emergency room resuscitation. Presumably, errors occur unintentionally and as a result of situational misjudgment. As such errors have marked consequences on mortality and morbidity of severely injured patients, an extensive risk management is mandatory for the improvement of quality and safety. Appropriate methods to record errors in order to allow a correct root cause analysis according to well-established protocols is a basic prerequisite.

摘要

背景

每年,可预防的不良事件危及大量患者。联邦联合委员会的现行指南要求临床质量管理提供独立的临床风险管理和危急事件报告系统(CIRS)等。此类指南增加了积极应对差错的压力,即使在急诊医学领域也是如此。人为差错被认为是航空等高风险行业可预防不良事件的主要原因。人们欣然将这一观察结果直接应用于临床医学。

目的

本研究调查了在重伤患者复苏过程中可预防不良事件的真正原因所在。

方法

对PubMed数据库进行了非系统性文献检索。

结果

检索发现三项近期针对这些目标的研究,这些研究表明人为差错是急诊室复苏期间可预防不良事件的最重要原因(88%-97%)。急诊室复苏期间的差错发生率约为10%。令人惊讶的是,这些数据与20年前开展的研究所描述的结果并无太大差异。一种可能的解释或许是,急诊室医疗差错的系统评估是一个薄弱环节,且从此类事件中吸取的教训太少。因此,本文描述了差错发生模式,并概述了收集数据以进行根本原因分析和临床风险管理的方法。因此,本综述旨在更好地理解差错是如何产生的,并制定策略以防止差错再次发生。

结论

人为差错是急诊室复苏期间可预防不良事件的最重要原因。据推测,差错是由于情境判断失误而无意发生的。由于此类差错对重伤患者的死亡率和发病率有显著影响,广泛的风险管理对于提高质量和安全性是必不可少的。采用适当方法记录差错,以便根据既定方案进行正确的根本原因分析,这是一个基本前提。

相似文献

1
[Better apprehension of errors in the early clinical treatment of the severely injured].[提高对严重创伤早期临床治疗中错误的认识]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 Aug;118(8):675-85. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0029-4.
2
Preventable and potentially preventable deaths in severely injured elderly patients: a single-center retrospective data analysis of a German trauma center.重伤老年患者中可预防和潜在可预防的死亡:德国一家创伤中心的单中心回顾性数据分析
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3125-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2755-0.
3
[Interdisciplinary treatment of severely injured patients in the trauma resuscitation room].[创伤复苏室中重伤患者的多学科治疗]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jun;45(6):390-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255346. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
4
Trauma reception and resuscitation.创伤接诊与复苏
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Aug;76(8):725-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03841.x.
5
Patient safety and error management: what causes adverse events and how can they be prevented?患者安全与差错管理:不良事件的成因及预防方法
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Feb;107(6):92-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0092. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
6
Critical incidents during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what are the problems nobody wants to talk about?院前心肺复苏期间的危急事件:那些没人愿意谈论的问题是什么?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;18(1):38-40. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32833b1a61.
7
Using video recording to identify management errors in pediatric trauma resuscitation.使用视频记录识别儿童创伤复苏中的管理失误。
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):658-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1803.
8
Patient safety in trauma: maximal impact management errors at a level I trauma center.创伤患者的安全:一级创伤中心的最大影响管理失误
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):265-70; discussion 270-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163359d.
9
[Results of provisional use of a system for voluntary anonymous reporting of incidents that threaten patient safety in the emergency medical services of Asturias].[阿斯图里亚斯紧急医疗服务中威胁患者安全事件自愿匿名报告系统的临时使用结果]
Emergencias. 2016 Jun;28(3):146-152.
10
[Emergency room management of severely injured patients].[重伤患者的急诊室管理]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Dec;58(12):1216-22. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1646-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical incident reporting systems (CIRS) in trauma patients may identify common quality problems.创伤患者的关键事件报告系统(CIRS)可识别常见的质量问题。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Apr;47(2):445-452. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01128-y. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
2
[Human factors in medicine].[医学中的人为因素]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0261-5.
3
[Human factors in medicine].[医学中的人为因素]

本文引用的文献

1
Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation.术中并发症的定义与分类(CLASSIC):德尔菲研究与初步评估
World J Surg. 2015 Jul;39(7):1663-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3003-y.
2
Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: a 9-year review using the Joint Commission's standardized methodology.对可预防和潜在可预防的创伤死亡中的错误进行分类:采用联合委员会标准化方法的9年回顾。
Am J Surg. 2014 Aug;208(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
3
Positioning of term infants during delivery room routine handling - analysis of videos.
Urologe A. 2017 Jan;56(1):97-113. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0302-3.
分娩室常规处理时足月产婴儿体位——视频分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Feb 4;14:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-33.
4
The impact of brief team communication, leadership and team behavior training on ad hoc team performance in trauma care settings.简短团队沟通、领导和团队行为训练对创伤护理环境中临时团队绩效的影响。
Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
5
[Human factors and crisis resource management: improving patient safety].[人为因素与危机资源管理:提高患者安全]
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Oct;116(10):892-9. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2447-5.
6
Identifying and addressing preventable process errors in trauma care.识别和解决创伤护理中的可预防流程错误。
World J Surg. 2013 Apr;37(4):752-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1917-9.
7
Association between trauma quality indicators and outcomes for injured patients.创伤质量指标与受伤患者结局之间的关联。
Arch Surg. 2012 Apr;147(4):308-15. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1327. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
8
In situ, multidisciplinary, simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care.现场、多学科、基于模拟的团队合作培训提高了早期创伤护理水平。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;68(6):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies.外科病房不良事件的发生率、根本原因及后果:对潜在预防策略的启示
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 May 20;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-13.
10
Trauma resuscitation errors and computer-assisted decision support.创伤复苏错误与计算机辅助决策支持
Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):218-25. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.333.