• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医学中的人为因素]

[Human factors in medicine].

作者信息

Lazarovici M, Trentzsch H, Prückner S

机构信息

Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Schillerstr. 53, 80336, München, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0261-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-016-0261-5
PMID:28070607
Abstract

The concept of human factors is commonly used in the context of patient safety and medical errors, all too often ambiguously. In actual fact, the term comprises a wide range of meanings from human-machine interfaces through human performance and limitations up to the point of working process design; however, human factors prevail as a substantial cause of error in complex systems. This article presents the full range of the term human factors from the (emergency) medical perspective. Based on the so-called Swiss cheese model by Reason, we explain the different types of error, what promotes their emergence and on which level of the model error prevention can be initiated.

摘要

人为因素的概念常用于患者安全和医疗差错的背景下,而且常常含混不清。实际上,该术语涵盖了从人机界面到人的表现与局限性,直至工作流程设计等广泛的含义;然而,在复杂系统中,人为因素是导致差错的一个重要原因。本文从(急诊)医学角度阐述了人为因素这一术语的全部内容。基于瑞森提出的所谓瑞士奶酪模型,我们解释了不同类型的差错、促使其出现的因素以及在该模型的哪个层面可以启动差错预防。

相似文献

1
[Human factors in medicine].[医学中的人为因素]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0261-5.
2
[Human factors in medicine].[医学中的人为因素]
Urologe A. 2017 Jan;56(1):97-113. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0302-3.
3
James Reason: patient safety, human error, and Swiss cheese. Interview by Karolina Peltomaa and Duncan Neuhauser.詹姆斯·瑞森:患者安全、人为失误与瑞士奶酪模型。卡罗利娜·佩尔托马和邓肯·纽豪泽采访
Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;21(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3182418294.
4
The Swiss cheese model of adverse event occurrence--Closing the holes.不良事件发生的瑞士奶酪模型——填补漏洞
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015 Dec;24(6):278-82. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.08.003.
5
Effectiveness of the surgical safety checklist in correcting errors: a literature review applying Reason's Swiss cheese model.手术安全核对表在纠正错误方面的有效性:一项应用瑞森瑞士奶酪模型的文献综述
AORN J. 2014 Jul;100(1):65-79.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.07.024.
6
Hot cheese: a processed Swiss cheese model.热奶酪:一种加工瑞士奶酪模型。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2014;44(2):116-21. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2014.205.
7
Improving safety for children with cardiac disease.提高患有心脏病儿童的安全性。
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:127-32. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001230.
8
Medical error and human factors engineering: where are we now?医疗差错与人为因素工程学:我们如今处于什么阶段?
Am J Med Qual. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):57-67. doi: 10.1177/1062860605283932.
9
Human error or system failure?
Emerg Nurse. 2017 Feb 10;24(9):14. doi: 10.7748/en.24.9.14.s16.
10
[Patient safety - definition and epidemiology of adverse events, errors and incidents].[患者安全——不良事件、差错及事故的定义与流行病学]
Ther Umsch. 2012 Jun;69(6):335-40. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000294.

引用本文的文献

1
[Simulations in continuing education for more patient safety : Do simulation and skills training influence patient safety in Germany?].[继续教育中的模拟以提高患者安全性:模拟和技能培训对德国患者安全有影响吗?]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;126(4):268-273. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01272-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
[Systematic risk management for a planned gas shutdown in the high-care facility of a university hospital].
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Apr;72(4):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01254-8. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
3
COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.COVID-19 重症监护模拟:一项国际横断面调查。

本文引用的文献

1
[Better apprehension of errors in the early clinical treatment of the severely injured].[提高对严重创伤早期临床治疗中错误的认识]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 Aug;118(8):675-85. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0029-4.
2
Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: a 9-year review using the Joint Commission's standardized methodology.对可预防和潜在可预防的创伤死亡中的错误进行分类:采用联合委员会标准化方法的9年回顾。
Am J Surg. 2014 Aug;208(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
3
[Does simulator-based team training improve patient safety?].
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;9:700769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769. eCollection 2021.
基于模拟器的团队培训能提高患者安全吗?
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Oct;116(10):900-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2444-8.
4
The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers.隐形大猩猩再次出击:专家观察者持续出现不注意盲视。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1848-53. doi: 10.1177/0956797613479386. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Spreading human factors expertise in healthcare: untangling the knots in people and systems.在医疗保健领域传播人为因素专业知识:解开人与系统中的症结。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):793-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002036. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction.人类因素科学:区分事实与虚构。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):802-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001450. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Identifying and addressing preventable process errors in trauma care.识别和解决创伤护理中的可预防流程错误。
World J Surg. 2013 Apr;37(4):752-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1917-9.
8
[Do residents and nurses communicate safety relevant concerns? : simulation study on the influence of the authority gradient].[住院医师和护士是否会交流与安全相关的问题?:关于权威梯度影响的模拟研究]
Anaesthesist. 2012 Oct;61(10):857-66. doi: 10.1007/s00101-012-2086-1. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
9
Patient safety in trauma: maximal impact management errors at a level I trauma center.创伤患者的安全:一级创伤中心的最大影响管理失误
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):265-70; discussion 270-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163359d.
10
[Innovative training for enhancing patient safety. Safety culture and integrated concepts].[创新培训以提高患者安全。安全文化与综合概念]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1033-42. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0523-3.