Greenhouse Ian, Sias Ana, Labruna Ludovica, Ivry Richard B
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720.
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 29;35(30):10675-84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1436-15.2015.
Motor system excitability is transiently inhibited during the preparation of responses. Previous studies have attributed this inhibition to the operation of two mechanisms, one hypothesized to help resolve competition between alternative response options, and the other to prevent premature response initiation. By this view, inhibition should be restricted to task-relevant muscles. Although this prediction is supported in one previous study (Duque et al., 2010), studies of stopping ongoing actions suggest that some forms of motor inhibition may be widespread (Badry et al., 2009). This motivated us to conduct a series of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments to examine in detail the specificity of preparatory inhibition in humans. Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevant muscles during response preparation, even when the muscles were contralateral and not homologous to the responding effector. Inhibition was also observed in both choice and simple response task conditions, with and without a preparatory interval. Control experiments ruled out that this inhibition is due to expectancy of TMS or a possible need to cancel the prepared response. These findings suggest that motor inhibition during response preparation broadly influences the motor system and likely reflects a process that occurs whenever a response is selected. We propose a reinterpretation of the functional significance of preparatory inhibition, one by which inhibition reduces noise to enhance signal processing and modulates the gain of a selected response.
Motor preparation entails the recruitment of excitatory and inhibitory neural mechanisms. The current experiments address the specificity of inhibitory mechanisms, asking whether preparatory inhibition affects task-irrelevant muscles. Participants prepared a finger movement to be executed at the end of a short delay period. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex provided an assay of corticospinal excitability. Consistent with earlier work, the agonist muscle for the forthcoming response was inhibited during the preparatory period. Moreover, this inhibition was evident in task-irrelevant muscles, although the magnitude of inhibition depended on whether the response was fixed or involved a choice. These results implicate a broadly tuned inhibitory mechanism that facilitates response preparation, perhaps by lowering background activity before response initiation.
在准备做出反应的过程中,运动系统的兴奋性会被短暂抑制。以往的研究将这种抑制归因于两种机制的运作,一种机制被认为有助于解决不同反应选项之间的竞争,另一种机制则是防止过早开始反应。按照这种观点,抑制作用应仅限于与任务相关的肌肉。尽管这一预测在之前的一项研究中得到了支持(杜克等人,2010年),但对停止正在进行的动作的研究表明,某些形式的运动抑制可能是广泛存在的(巴德里等人,2009年)。这促使我们进行了一系列经颅磁刺激(TMS)实验,以详细研究人类准备性抑制的特异性。在准备做出反应的过程中,即使这些肌肉是对侧的且与做出反应的效应器并非同源,与任务无关的肌肉中的运动诱发电位也会受到抑制。在有和没有准备间隔的选择反应任务和简单反应任务条件下均观察到了抑制现象。对照实验排除了这种抑制是由于对TMS的预期或可能需要取消准备好的反应所致。这些发现表明,反应准备过程中的运动抑制广泛地影响运动系统,并且可能反映了每当选择一个反应时都会发生的一个过程。我们提出了对准备性抑制功能意义的重新解释,即抑制作用通过减少噪声来增强信号处理,并调节所选反应的增益。
运动准备需要募集兴奋性和抑制性神经机制。当前的实验探讨了抑制机制的特异性,即准备性抑制是否会影响与任务无关的肌肉。参与者准备在短延迟期结束时执行手指运动。对初级运动皮层进行经颅磁刺激提供了一种评估皮质脊髓兴奋性的方法。与早期研究一致,即将做出反应的主动肌在准备期受到抑制。此外,这种抑制在与任务无关的肌肉中也很明显,尽管抑制的程度取决于反应是固定的还是涉及选择。这些结果表明存在一种广泛调节的抑制机制,它可能通过在反应开始前降低背景活动来促进反应准备。