• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙刷与魔术贴对牙釉质磨损性的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究

Comparative evaluation of enamel abrasivity by toothbrush and velcro: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study.

作者信息

Ojha Saroj Kumar, Javdekar Sadashiv Bhaskar, Dhir Sangeeta

机构信息

Department of Dental Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.

Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Dr BR Ambedkar Institute of Dental Sciences, Patna, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):263-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.156873.

DOI:10.4103/0972-124X.156873
PMID:26229264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4520108/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Plaque control has been shown to be pivotal in maintaining the optimal periodontal health. Mechanical plaque control is the most popular option for establishing the optimal oral health. Toothbrushes have been the novel tool for mechanical cleansing. However, the abrasive potential of the toothbrushes on the enamel surface is an area in gray.

AIMS

The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the abrasivity of the toothbrush versus the velcro fasteners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The mounted teeth of both the groups were subjected to abrasion test, and the tooth surfaces were observed for the possible abrasions from the oscillating strokes (toothbrush) and frictional contacts (hook and loop velcro) and examined under the scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

Comparative assessment of both velcro (hook and loop) and toothbrush bristles did not reveal any evidence of abrasion on the tooth specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Veclro fasteners are safe and qualitatively at par to the manual toothbrush for their efficacy and efficiency in teeth cleansing.

摘要

背景

菌斑控制已被证明在维持最佳牙周健康方面至关重要。机械性菌斑控制是建立最佳口腔健康的最常用方法。牙刷一直是机械清洁的新型工具。然而,牙刷对牙釉质表面的磨损潜力是一个尚不清楚的领域。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估牙刷与魔术贴的磨损性。

材料与方法

两组的安装牙齿均进行磨损试验,观察牙齿表面因振荡冲程(牙刷)和摩擦接触(钩环魔术贴)可能产生的磨损,并在扫描电子显微镜下检查。

结果

对魔术贴(钩和环)和牙刷刷毛的比较评估未发现牙齿标本有任何磨损迹象。

结论

魔术贴在清洁牙齿的功效和效率方面是安全的,在质量上与手动牙刷相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/185c629f1b90/JISP-19-263-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/27be950a2fae/JISP-19-263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/e45eb7706ed5/JISP-19-263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/21d55bac3aba/JISP-19-263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/f11ea285c08d/JISP-19-263-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/3511dceafcca/JISP-19-263-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/44626420d761/JISP-19-263-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/f3b2f845221a/JISP-19-263-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/bbe606f83d4b/JISP-19-263-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/aff115b4d608/JISP-19-263-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/fd46bd05af0a/JISP-19-263-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/185c629f1b90/JISP-19-263-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/27be950a2fae/JISP-19-263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/e45eb7706ed5/JISP-19-263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/21d55bac3aba/JISP-19-263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/f11ea285c08d/JISP-19-263-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/3511dceafcca/JISP-19-263-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/44626420d761/JISP-19-263-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/f3b2f845221a/JISP-19-263-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/bbe606f83d4b/JISP-19-263-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/aff115b4d608/JISP-19-263-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/fd46bd05af0a/JISP-19-263-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/4520108/185c629f1b90/JISP-19-263-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of enamel abrasivity by toothbrush and velcro: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study.牙刷与魔术贴对牙釉质磨损性的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):263-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.156873.
2
Impact of toothpaste slurry abrasivity and toothbrush filament stiffness on abrasion of eroded enamel - an in vitro study.牙膏膏体磨蚀性和牙刷刷毛硬度对侵蚀性牙釉质磨损的影响——一项体外研究
Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Aug;66(4):231-5. doi: 10.1080/00016350802195041.
3
Impact of toothbrush head configuration and dentifrice abrasivity on non-carious cervical lesions in-vitro.牙刷头形状和牙膏磨蚀性对体外非龋性颈病变的影响。
J Dent. 2024 Jan;140:104798. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104798. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
4
A Profilometric Study to Assess the Role of Toothbrush and Toothpaste in Abrasion Process.一项评估牙刷和牙膏在磨损过程中作用的轮廓测定研究。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Sep;16(3 Suppl):267-73.
5
Interplay between toothbrush stiffness and dentifrice abrasivity on the development of non-carious cervical lesions.牙刷硬度与牙膏磨蚀性在非龋性牙颈部缺损发展中的相互作用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3551-3556. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2776-4. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
Comparative evaluation of cemental abrasion caused by soft and medium bristle hardness toothbrushes at three predetermined toothbrushing forces: An study.在三种预定刷牙力度下,对软毛和中毛硬度牙刷导致的牙骨质磨损进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):10-15. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_118_17.
7
Comparative Efficacy of a Soft Toothbrush with Tapered-tip Bristles to an ADA Reference Toothbrush on Gingival Abrasion over a 12-Week Period.软质锥形刷头牙刷与美国牙医学会参考牙刷在12周内对牙龈磨损的比较疗效
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):48-53.
8
Comparison of surface abrasion produced on the enamel surface by a standard dentifrice using three different toothbrush bristle designs: A profilometric in vitro study.使用三种不同牙刷刷毛设计的标准牙膏在牙釉质表面产生的表面磨损比较:一项体外轮廓测量研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):369-73. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.136513.
9
Toothbrush abrasivity in a long-term simulation on human dentin depends on brushing mode and bristle arrangement.在对人牙本质进行的长期模拟实验中,牙刷的磨损性取决于刷牙方式和刷毛排列。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172060. eCollection 2017.
10
Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的临床效果及牙龈磨损情况比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jan;28(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280110.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A profilometric and scanning electron microscopic analysis of tooth surface abrasion caused by rotary/oscillatory, linear motion, sonic, and ultrasonic toothbrushes: An study.旋转/振荡、直线运动、声波和超声波牙刷导致的牙齿表面磨损的轮廓测量和扫描电子显微镜分析:一项研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Mar-Apr;25(2):112-119. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_162_20. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
EXPERIMENTAL GINGIVITIS IN MAN.人类实验性牙龈炎
J Periodontol (1930). 1965 May-Jun;36:177-87. doi: 10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177.
2
Impact of improved toothbrushes on dental diseases. I.改良牙刷对牙齿疾病的影响。一
Quintessence Int. 1997 Aug;28(8):513-25.
3
Histological evaluation of gingival damage by toothbrushing. An experimental study in dog.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1975;33(3):119-27. doi: 10.3109/00016357509026352.
4
Traumatization of teeth and gingiva related to habitual tooth cleaning procedures.
J Clin Periodontol. 1976 May;3(2):94-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1976.tb01855.x.
5
Prevalence of oral soft and hard tissue lesions related to mechanical toothcleansing procedures.与机械性牙齿清洁程序相关的口腔软硬组织病变的患病率。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1976 Mar;4(2):77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1976.tb01607.x.