Singh Tejinder Pal, Nirola Ashutosh, Brar Rubby
Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, MN DAV Dental College, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Luxmi Bai Institiute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Mar-Apr;25(2):112-119. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_162_20. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Adequate plaque control facilitates good gingival and periodontal health, prevents tooth decay, and preserves oral health. Toothbrushing is the primary method of removing plaque and can be classified into powered and manual toothbrushes.
The primary objective was to compare the abrasiveness and surface roughness caused by four different power-driven toothbrushes with a different mode of action, on tooth surfaces .
An experiment was conducted on eighty freshly extracted tooth specimens which were equally divided into four groups. Each group was brushed with the specifically assigned electric toothbrush to that group, but keeping parameters such as force applied during brushing, storage of tooth before and after brushing, and toothbrushing time same. A total of the 2-month study was done on each tooth specimen. Tooth surface roughness was recorded before and after the toothbrushing experiment to check the difference between surface roughness readings. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis was done afterward to analyse the surface topography of each group specimens.
Paired -test used for intergroup analysis and intragroup analysis was done using Kruskal-Wallis test.
After comparing the baseline and final readings of each group, it has been found that the mean difference between values is highly significant in Group 1 (rotary/oscillatory). The mean rank of Group 1 was least in all four groups, which showed the highest tooth surface abrasion in that group. SEM analysis also revealed that Group 1 tooth specimens had deeper scratches/lines comparatively to other groups.
Rotary/oscillatory toothbrush caused the highest tooth surface abrasion when compared with other electronic toothbrushes.
充分的牙菌斑控制有助于保持良好的牙龈和牙周健康,预防龋齿,并维护口腔健康。刷牙是去除牙菌斑的主要方法,可分为电动牙刷和手动牙刷。
主要目的是比较四种不同作用方式的电动牙刷对牙齿表面造成的磨损性和表面粗糙度。
对80个新鲜拔除的牙齿标本进行实验,将其平均分为四组。每组使用专门分配给该组的电动牙刷刷牙,但保持刷牙时施加的力、刷牙前后牙齿的储存以及刷牙时间等参数相同。对每个牙齿标本进行为期2个月的研究。在刷牙实验前后记录牙齿表面粗糙度,以检查表面粗糙度读数之间的差异。之后进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析,以分析每组标本的表面形貌。
组间分析采用配对检验,组内分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。
比较每组的基线读数和最终读数后发现,第1组(旋转/振荡式)数值之间的平均差异非常显著。第1组的平均秩在所有四组中最低,表明该组牙齿表面磨损最高。SEM分析还显示,与其他组相比,第1组牙齿标本有更深的划痕/线条。
与其他电动牙刷相比,旋转/振荡式牙刷造成的牙齿表面磨损最高。