Suppr超能文献

旋转/振荡、直线运动、声波和超声波牙刷导致的牙齿表面磨损的轮廓测量和扫描电子显微镜分析:一项研究。

A profilometric and scanning electron microscopic analysis of tooth surface abrasion caused by rotary/oscillatory, linear motion, sonic, and ultrasonic toothbrushes: An study.

作者信息

Singh Tejinder Pal, Nirola Ashutosh, Brar Rubby

机构信息

Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, MN DAV Dental College, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Luxmi Bai Institiute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Mar-Apr;25(2):112-119. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_162_20. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate plaque control facilitates good gingival and periodontal health, prevents tooth decay, and preserves oral health. Toothbrushing is the primary method of removing plaque and can be classified into powered and manual toothbrushes.

AIM

The primary objective was to compare the abrasiveness and surface roughness caused by four different power-driven toothbrushes with a different mode of action, on tooth surfaces .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An experiment was conducted on eighty freshly extracted tooth specimens which were equally divided into four groups. Each group was brushed with the specifically assigned electric toothbrush to that group, but keeping parameters such as force applied during brushing, storage of tooth before and after brushing, and toothbrushing time same. A total of the 2-month study was done on each tooth specimen. Tooth surface roughness was recorded before and after the toothbrushing experiment to check the difference between surface roughness readings. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis was done afterward to analyse the surface topography of each group specimens.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Paired -test used for intergroup analysis and intragroup analysis was done using Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

After comparing the baseline and final readings of each group, it has been found that the mean difference between values is highly significant in Group 1 (rotary/oscillatory). The mean rank of Group 1 was least in all four groups, which showed the highest tooth surface abrasion in that group. SEM analysis also revealed that Group 1 tooth specimens had deeper scratches/lines comparatively to other groups.

CONCLUSION

Rotary/oscillatory toothbrush caused the highest tooth surface abrasion when compared with other electronic toothbrushes.

摘要

背景

充分的牙菌斑控制有助于保持良好的牙龈和牙周健康,预防龋齿,并维护口腔健康。刷牙是去除牙菌斑的主要方法,可分为电动牙刷和手动牙刷。

目的

主要目的是比较四种不同作用方式的电动牙刷对牙齿表面造成的磨损性和表面粗糙度。

材料和方法

对80个新鲜拔除的牙齿标本进行实验,将其平均分为四组。每组使用专门分配给该组的电动牙刷刷牙,但保持刷牙时施加的力、刷牙前后牙齿的储存以及刷牙时间等参数相同。对每个牙齿标本进行为期2个月的研究。在刷牙实验前后记录牙齿表面粗糙度,以检查表面粗糙度读数之间的差异。之后进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析,以分析每组标本的表面形貌。

使用的统计分析方法

组间分析采用配对检验,组内分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。

结果

比较每组的基线读数和最终读数后发现,第1组(旋转/振荡式)数值之间的平均差异非常显著。第1组的平均秩在所有四组中最低,表明该组牙齿表面磨损最高。SEM分析还显示,与其他组相比,第1组牙齿标本有更深的划痕/线条。

结论

与其他电动牙刷相比,旋转/振荡式牙刷造成的牙齿表面磨损最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fed9/8041087/3f715a7f2bb7/JISP-25-112-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验