Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), CEA - CNRS - UVSQ, CEA l'Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement (CIRED), CNRS - Ecole des Ponts ParisTech - EHESS - AgroParisTech - CIRAD, Campus du Jardin Tropical, 45 bis avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, 94736 Nogent-sur-Marne, France.
Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 3;6:7958. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8958.
To limit global warming to <2 °C we must reduce the net amount of CO2 we release into the atmosphere, either by producing less CO2 (conventional mitigation) or by capturing more CO2 (negative emissions). Here, using state-of-the-art carbon-climate models, we quantify the trade-off between these two options in RCP2.6: an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenario likely to limit global warming below 2 °C. In our best-case illustrative assumption of conventional mitigation, negative emissions of 0.5-3 Gt C (gigatonnes of carbon) per year and storage capacity of 50-250 Gt C are required. In our worst case, those requirements are 7-11 Gt C per year and 1,000-1,600 Gt C, respectively. Because these figures have not been shown to be feasible, we conclude that development of negative emission technologies should be accelerated, but also that conventional mitigation must remain a substantial part of any climate policy aiming at the 2-°C target.
为了将全球变暖限制在<2°C以下,我们必须减少向大气中排放的二氧化碳净量,要么通过减少二氧化碳的产生(常规缓解),要么通过捕获更多的二氧化碳(负排放)。在这里,我们使用最先进的碳气候模型,在 RCP2.6 中量化了这两种选择之间的权衡:这是一个政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)情景,可能会将全球变暖限制在 2°C 以下。在我们对常规缓解的最佳情况说明性假设中,每年需要负排放 0.5-3 吉吨(千兆吨)碳和储存能力 50-250 吉吨碳。在最坏的情况下,这些需求分别为每年 7-11 吉吨碳和 1000-1600 吉吨碳。由于这些数字尚未被证明是可行的,我们得出的结论是,应加速开发负排放技术,但同时常规缓解仍必须是任何旨在实现 2°C 目标的气候政策的重要组成部分。