Walraven Iris, Mast M Ruth, Hoekstra Trynke, Jansen Aaltje P D, Rauh Simone P, Rutters Femke R, van der Heijden Amber A W A, Elders Petra J M, Moll Annette C, Polak Bettine C P, Dekker Jacqueline M, Nijpels Giel
aEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics cDepartment of Ophthalmology dDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy eDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Hypertens. 2015 Oct;33(10):2091-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000680.
In order to eventually improve blood pressure (BP) management, the aim of this study was to identify subgroups of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with distinct trajectories of SBP levels. Identifying subgroups with distinct SBP trajectories helps to better understand the course of SBP levels in T2DM patients and its associated consequences. Subgroup characteristics were determined and the prevalence of complications and mortality rates over time in the different subgroups was investigated.
Five thousand, seven hundred and eleven T2DM patients with at least two SBP follow-up measurements were selected from a prospective T2DM cohort of 9849 T2DM patients. The mean follow-up period was 5.7 years (range 2-9 years). Latent Class Growth Modeling, as currently the most flexible cluster analysis available, was performed to identify subgroups of patients with distinct SBP trajectories. Subgroup characteristics were determined by multinomial logistic regression analyses.
Four subgroups with distinct SBP trajectories were identified. The largest subgroup (85.6%) showed adequate SBP control (at or around 140 mmHg) over time. The second subgroup (5.6%) were hypertensive in the first years, responded slowly to BP management and eventually reached SBP control. The third subgroup (3.4%) showed deteriorating hypertension during the first 4 years, then showed insufficient response to BP management. The fourth subgroup (5.4%) showed deteriorating hypertension over time. Patients within subgroups 2-4 were significantly older, comprised more women, used more antihypertensive medication and had a higher prevalence of retinopathy, microalbuminuria and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
More than 85% reached and maintained adequate SBP control. Subgroups with a more unfavourable course of SBP control also showed higher rates of microvascular complications and CVD mortality over time. This study identified important subgroups to target in order to improve BP management in T2DM patients.
为最终改善血压(BP)管理,本研究旨在识别2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中收缩压(SBP)水平具有不同轨迹的亚组。识别具有不同SBP轨迹的亚组有助于更好地了解T2DM患者SBP水平的变化过程及其相关后果。确定了亚组特征,并调查了不同亚组中并发症的患病率和随时间的死亡率。
从9849例T2DM患者的前瞻性队列中选取了5711例至少有两次SBP随访测量值的T2DM患者。平均随访期为5.7年(范围2 - 9年)。采用目前最灵活的聚类分析方法——潜在类别增长模型,以识别具有不同SBP轨迹的患者亚组。通过多项逻辑回归分析确定亚组特征。
识别出了四个具有不同SBP轨迹的亚组。最大的亚组(85.6%)随时间显示SBP控制良好(在140 mmHg左右或更低)。第二个亚组(5.6%)在最初几年血压升高,对BP管理反应缓慢,最终实现了SBP控制。第三个亚组(3.4%)在最初4年高血压病情恶化,随后对BP管理反应不足。第四个亚组(5.4%)随时间高血压病情不断恶化。第2 - 4亚组中的患者年龄显著更大,女性更多,使用更多的抗高血压药物,视网膜病变、微量白蛋白尿和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率的患病率更高。
超过85%的患者达到并维持了足够的SBP控制。SBP控制过程更不利的亚组随着时间推移也显示出更高的微血管并发症发生率和CVD死亡率。本研究确定了重要的亚组,以便针对这些亚组改善T2DM患者的BP管理。