• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再治疗中使用的封闭剂溶剂会影响根尖挤出的碎屑吗?

Do the Sealer Solvents Used Affect Apically Extruded Debris in Retreatment?

作者信息

Çanakçi Burhan Can, Er Ozgur, Dincer Asiye

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.

出版信息

J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1507-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.010
PMID:26238529
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated apically extruded debris in the retreatment of root canals filled with different root canal sealers and gutta-percha using different solvents.

METHODS

Ninety human mandibular central and lateral teeth were prepared using the Reciproc #25 .08 nickel-titanium system (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and were divided randomly into 6 groups. In groups 1, 2, and 3, root canals were filled with epoxy resin-based sealer and gutta-percha, and in groups 4, 5, and 6, root canals were filled with zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer and gutta-percha. Each tooth was placed in a glass vial experimental apparatus. All root canal fillings were removed with the ProTaper Retreatment nickel-titanium system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). During the retreatment procedure, in group 1, Resosolv (Pierre Rolland, Merignac, France) was used; in group 4, Endosolv E (Septodont, Paris, France) was used; and in groups 2 and 5, Guttasolv (Septodont) was used as the solvent. In the control groups (groups 3 and 6), no solvent was used. Reciproc #40 .06 was used for the final preparation. The times required for retreatments were recorded.

RESULTS

The weight of the extruded debris and the time required for retreatment were decreased significantly in the groups in which a solvent that was intended specifically for the root canal sealer was used (groups 1 and 4). In the Guttasolv groups (groups 2 and 5), the amount of apically extruded debris and the time required decreased for both root canal sealers.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of apically extruded debris and the duration of retreatment were reduced by the use of a solvent specific to the sealer compared with a gutta-percha solvent or no solvent.

摘要

引言

我们评估了使用不同溶剂对充填有不同根管封闭剂和牙胶的根管进行再治疗时根尖挤出碎屑的情况。

方法

使用Reciproc #25.08镍钛系统(德国慕尼黑VDW有限公司)对90颗人下颌中切牙和侧切牙进行预备,并随机分为6组。第1、2和3组根管充填环氧树脂类封闭剂和牙胶,第4、5和6组根管充填氧化锌丁香酚类封闭剂和牙胶。每颗牙齿置于玻璃小瓶实验装置中。使用ProTaper再治疗镍钛系统(瑞士拜莱格Dentsply Maillefer公司)去除所有根管充填物。在再治疗过程中,第1组使用Resosolv(法国梅里尼亚克Pierre Rolland公司);第4组使用Endosolv E(法国巴黎Septodont公司);第2和5组使用Guttasolv(Septodont公司)作为溶剂。对照组(第3和6组)不使用溶剂。使用Reciproc #40.06进行最终预备。记录再治疗所需时间。

结果

使用专门针对根管封闭剂的溶剂的组(第1和4组),挤出碎屑的重量和再治疗所需时间显著减少。在Guttasolv组(第2和5组),两种根管封闭剂的根尖挤出碎屑量和所需时间均减少。

结论

与使用牙胶溶剂或不使用溶剂相比,使用封闭剂专用溶剂可减少根尖挤出碎屑量和再治疗时间。

相似文献

1
Do the Sealer Solvents Used Affect Apically Extruded Debris in Retreatment?再治疗中使用的封闭剂溶剂会影响根尖挤出的碎屑吗?
J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1507-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
2
Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris from Curved Root Canal Filling Removal Using 5 Nickel-Titanium Systems.使用5种镍钛系统评估弯曲根管充填物去除后根尖挤出碎屑的情况。
J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.评价几种镍钛系统在根管再治疗中根管内碎屑的推出情况。
Int Endod J. 2015 Dec;48(12):1194-8. doi: 10.1111/iej.12425. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.使用ProTaper、D-RaCe和R-Endo旋转镍钛再治疗器械及手动锉去除根管充填材料时根尖挤出碎屑的评估。
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2066-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris during retreatment of root canals filled by different obturation techniques.不同充填技术充填根管再治疗期间根尖部挤出碎屑量的评估
Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov-Dec;18(6):802-6. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.158140.
6
Efficiency and apical extrusion of debris: a comparative ex vivo study of four retreatment techniques in severely curved root canals.四种根管再治疗技术在重度弯曲根管中对清理效率和根尖碎屑推出的体外对比研究。
Int Endod J. 2017 Sep;50(9):910-918. doi: 10.1111/iej.12708. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
7
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption.评价三种不同镍钛器械系统和手用器械在有模拟根尖吸收根管内去除根管充填材料时的根尖碎屑推出量。
Int Endod J. 2020 Mar;53(3):403-409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13234. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
8
Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two Ni-Ti systems and hand files when removing root fillings: a laboratory study.使用两种镍钛系统和手动锉去除根管充填物时根尖挤出的碎屑和冲洗液:一项实验室研究
Int Endod J. 2013 Dec;46(12):1125-30. doi: 10.1111/iej.12104. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
9
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from oval root canals: a micro-computed tomography study.ProTaper Universal 旋转根管再治疗系统去除椭圆形根管内牙胶的效果:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Endod. 2012 Nov;38(11):1516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
10
Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment.不同镍钛器械在根管再治疗中去除牙胶的效果
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):646-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of treatment variables on apical extrusion of debris during root canal retreatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of laboratory studies.根管再治疗期间治疗变量对根尖碎屑挤出的影响:实验室研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Winter;18(1):1-16. doi: 10.34172/joddd.40501. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
In vitro assessment of the roles of initial preparation size and solvent application on apically extruded debris in endodontically treated teeth.体外评估初始预备尺寸和溶剂应用对根管治疗牙齿根尖部挤出碎屑的作用。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023 Fall;17(4):250-255. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.40665. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
3
Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris During Retreatment Procedures Using Various File Systems in Teeth With Simulated Apical Root Resorption: An In Vitro Study.
在模拟根尖吸收的牙齿中使用各种锉系统进行再治疗时根尖挤出碎屑的评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Jun 24;15(6):e40904. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40904. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Effect of GuttaClear on Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Retreatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.《根管再治疗术后疼痛的 GuttaClear 治疗效果:一项随机临床试验》
Eur Endod J. 2023 Jan;8(1):55-64. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.85047.
5
Are Endodontic Solvents Cytotoxic? An In Vitro Study on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.牙髓溶剂具有细胞毒性吗?一项关于人牙周膜干细胞的体外研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 8;14(11):2415. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112415.
6
Retreatment of Experimental Carrier-Based Obturators with the Remover NiTi Instrument: Evaluation of Apical Extrusion and Effects of New Kinematics.使用镍钛去除器械对基于载体的实验性充填器进行再处理:根尖挤出评估及新运动学的影响
Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 23;2021:2755680. doi: 10.1155/2021/2755680. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of laser-activated and ultrasonic-activated techniques for the removal of tricalcium silicate-based sealers and gutta-percha in root canal retreatment: a microtomography and scanning electron microscopy study.激光激活与超声激活技术去除根管再治疗中三氧化钙基封闭剂和牙胶的效果比较:显微 CT 和扫描电镜研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 22;21(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01638-5.
8
Evaluation of the amount of remained sealer in the dentinal tubules following re-treatment with and without solvent.在有无溶剂的情况下进行再治疗后,评估牙本质小管中残留封闭剂的量。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;23(4):407-411. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_445_20. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
Improvement of the efficacy of endodontic solvents by ultrasonic agitation.通过超声震荡提高牙髓溶剂的疗效。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Jan;33(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
Efficacy and Cytotoxicity of Binary Mixtures as Root Canal Filling Solvents.二元混合物作为根管充填溶剂的疗效和细胞毒性
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 21;13(14):3237. doi: 10.3390/ma13143237.