Pirani Chiara, Iacono Francesco, Zamparini Fausto, Generali Luigi, Prati Carlo
Endodontic Clinical Section, School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Surgery Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance (CHIMOMO), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 23;2021:2755680. doi: 10.1155/2021/2755680. eCollection 2021.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the retreatment time and weight of apically extruded debris yielded by two different kinematics during the removal of different root canal filling materials. Forty straight single-rooted extracted teeth were instrumented with HyFlex CM files and obturated with two different techniques: 25.04 HyFlex experimental carrier-based obturators (Coltène/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) (group 1) or 25.04 single gutta-percha cones (Roeko Coltène/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) (group 2) and Guttaflow Bioseal as the sealer. Samples were divided into four subgroups ( = 10) according to the used kinematics for the removal of root canal filling materials: continuous rotation (A) or retreatment motion (B) with a Remover and HyFlex EDM Nickel-Titanium instruments activated with a CanalPro Jeni micromotor (Coltène/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). Time for retreatment was digitally recorded, and debris extruded from the apex was collected in Eppendorf tubes and weighted with an analytical balance. Data on retreatment time and apical extrusion were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test ( < 0.05). Working length was achieved in all the retreated samples. The removal of root filling material resulted significantly faster with the Jeni mode ( < 0.001), and the difference was significant for the removal of both filling materials ( < 0.05). No significant differences on debris extrusion between single cone and experimental obturators groups were noted ( > 0.05), and no significant differences between kinematics (continuous rotation vs. Jeni motion) were observed ( > 0.05). All the tested retreatment strategies lead to an extrusion of material from the apex, and the weight of apically extruded debris was similar. The use of the innovative CanalPro Jeni kinematics accelerates the time for the removal of root filling materials.
本研究的目的是评估在去除不同根管充填材料时,两种不同运动方式产生的根尖部挤出碎屑的再治疗时间和重量。40颗直单根离体牙用HyFlex CM锉进行预备,并采用两种不同技术进行充填:25.04 HyFlex实验性载体式充填器(Coltène/Whaledent,瑞士阿尔特施泰滕)(第1组)或25.04单根牙胶尖(Roeko Coltène/Whaledent,瑞士阿尔特施泰滕)(第2组),并用Guttaflow Bioseal作为封闭剂。根据去除根管充填材料所使用的运动方式,将样本分为四个亚组(每组 = 10):使用Remover和HyFlex EDM镍钛器械并通过CanalPro Jeni微型马达(Coltène/Whaledent,瑞士阿尔特施泰滕)激活的连续旋转(A)或再治疗运动(B)。对再治疗时间进行数字记录,并将从根尖挤出的碎屑收集到Eppendorf管中,用分析天平称重。用Kruskal-Wallis检验对再治疗时间和根尖挤出的数据进行统计分析(P < 0.05)。所有再治疗样本均达到工作长度。使用Jeni模式去除根管充填材料的速度明显更快(P < 0.001),并且对于两种充填材料的去除差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。单根牙胶尖组和实验性充填器组之间在碎屑挤出方面未观察到显著差异(P > 0.05),运动方式(连续旋转与Jeni运动)之间也未观察到显著差异(P > 0.05)。所有测试的再治疗策略均导致材料从根尖挤出,并且根尖部挤出碎屑的重量相似。使用创新的CanalPro Jeni运动方式可加快去除根管充填材料的时间。