Sugawara Jun, Tomoto Tsubasa, Tanaka Hirofumi
Human Informatics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan;
Human Informatics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; and.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015 Oct;309(7):R732-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00095.2015. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Walking exercise with limb blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to increase muscular mass and strength even if it is performed at low exercise intensities. Despite mounting evidence for its efficacy and the increasing popularity, the safety of BFR exercise in relation to cardiac loads has not been established. The aim of this study was to determine the response of central hemodynamics during the BFR exercise to assess its impact on cardiac load. Fifteen apparently healthy sedentary or recreationally active adults (10 men and 5 women, 27 ± 1 yr) underwent five bouts of 2-min constant treadmill walking at 2 mph with 1-min rest intervals either with or without BFR on both proximal thighs. Beat-by-beat blood pressure and hemodynamics (via Modelflow method) were measured, and central arterial hemodynamics were evaluated with pulse wave analyses via general transfer function. Incident wave amplitude (IWA) and reflected wave amplitude (RWA) were obtained by the wave separation analysis. Peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased more substantially during walking with BFR (43 ± 5% vs. baseline) than without BFR (11 ± 4% vs. baseline). Aortic SBP did not change significantly during walking without BFR, but there was a substantial elevation in aortic SBP (43 ± 5% vs. baseline) during walking with BFR. Significant effect of BFR was seen in IWA but not in RWA. These findings suggest that even during slow-speed walking, leg BFR induces substantial hypertensive responses in the aorta. However, this response could not be explained by the augmented wave reflection.
有肢体血流限制(BFR)的步行运动已被证明即使在低运动强度下进行,也能增加肌肉质量和力量。尽管有越来越多的证据证明其有效性且其越来越受欢迎,但BFR运动与心脏负荷相关的安全性尚未确定。本研究的目的是确定BFR运动期间中心血流动力学的反应,以评估其对心脏负荷的影响。15名明显健康的久坐或有休闲活动的成年人(10名男性和5名女性,27±1岁)在近端大腿上进行了五次2分钟的恒定跑步机步行,速度为每小时2英里,休息间隔为1分钟,分别在有或无BFR的情况下进行。逐搏测量血压和血流动力学(通过模型流方法),并通过通用传递函数的脉搏波分析评估中心动脉血流动力学。通过波分离分析获得入射波振幅(IWA)和反射波振幅(RWA)。与无BFR时相比,有BFR时步行期间外周收缩压(SBP)升高更为显著(43±5% vs.基线)(无BFR时为11±4% vs.基线)。无BFR时步行期间主动脉SBP无显著变化,但有BFR时步行期间主动脉SBP有显著升高(43±5% vs.基线)。在IWA中观察到BFR的显著影响,但在RWA中未观察到。这些发现表明,即使在慢速步行期间,腿部BFR也会在主动脉中引起显著的高血压反应。然而,这种反应无法用增强的波反射来解释。