Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Exercise Science and Exercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Nov;22(11):1695-1704. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1982018. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
Resistance exercise (RE) has been shown to elevate hemodynamics and pulse wave reflection. However, the effects of acute RE with blood flow restriction (BFR) on hemodynamics and pulse wave reflection are unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences between upper- and lower-body RE with and without BFR on hemodynamics and pulse wave reflection. Twenty-three young resistance-trained individuals volunteered for the study. Hemodynamics and pulse wave reflection were assessed at rest, 10, 25, 40, and 55 min after either upper- or lower-body with or without BFR. The upper-body RE (URE) consisted of the latissimus dorsi pulldown and chest press; the lower-body RE (LRE) consisted of knee extension and knee flexion. The BFR condition consisted of four sets of 30, 15, 15, and 15 repetitions at 30% 1-repetition maximum (1RM) while the without BFR condition consisted of four sets of 8 repetitions at 70% 1RM. Heart rate, rate pressure product, and subendocardial viability ratio significantly (< 0.05) increased after all exercises. Brachial and aortic systolic blood pressure (BP) significantly (< 0.05) elevated after LRE while brachial and aortic diastolic BP significantly (< 0.05) reduced after URE. Augmentation pressure, augmentation index (AIx), AIx normalized at 75 bpm, and wasted left ventricular pressure energy significantly (< 0.05) increased after URE while transit time of reflected wave significantly (< 0.05) decreased after LRE. URE places greater stress on pulse wave reflection while LRE results in greater responses in BP. Regardless of URE or LRE, the cardiovascular responses between BFR and without BFR are similar. High-load resistance exercise and low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction may produce similar cardiovascular responses.Upper-body resistance exercise generates greater changes on pulse wave reflections while lower-body resistance exercise induces greater elevations in systolic blood pressure.
抗阻运动(RE)已被证明可升高血液动力学和脉搏波反射。然而,急性抗阻运动结合血流限制(BFR)对血液动力学和脉搏波反射的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估上、下肢有无 BFR 的抗阻运动对血液动力学和脉搏波反射的差异。23 名年轻的抗阻训练者自愿参加了这项研究。在休息时、10 分钟、25 分钟、40 分钟和 55 分钟后,分别评估上、下肢有无 BFR 的抗阻运动对上、下肢的血液动力学和脉搏波反射的影响。上肢体抗阻运动(URE)包括背阔肌下拉和卧推;下肢体抗阻运动(LRE)包括膝关节伸展和膝关节弯曲。BFR 条件包括 4 组,每组 30 次、15 次、15 次和 15 次,重复 1 次最大(1RM),而无 BFR 条件包括 4 组,每组 8 次,重复 70%1RM。所有运动后心率、心率压力乘积和心内膜下活力比均显著(<0.05)增加。LRE 后肱动脉和主动脉收缩压(BP)显著(<0.05)升高,而 URE 后肱动脉和主动脉舒张压(BP)显著(<0.05)降低。增强压、增强指数(AIx)、75 bpm 时 AIx 归一化和左心室压力能量浪费显著(<0.05)增加,而 LRE 后反射波的传输时间显著(<0.05)降低。URE 对上脉搏波反射的影响更大,而 LRE 对 BP 的反应更大。无论 URE 还是 LRE,BFR 和无 BFR 之间的心血管反应相似。高负荷抗阻运动和低负荷抗阻运动结合血流限制可能产生相似的心血管反应。上肢体抗阻运动对脉搏波反射产生更大的变化,而下肢体抗阻运动引起收缩压更大的升高。