Suppr超能文献

修订版爱荷华疼痛温度计(IPT-R)在不同认知功能正常和受损的老年人样本中的心理测量学评估:一项初步研究。

Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT-R) in a Sample of Diverse Cognitively Intact and Impaired Older Adults: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Ware Laurie Jowers, Herr Keela A, Booker Staja Star, Dotson Kelley, Key Jennifer, Poindexter Norma, Pyles Gia, Siler Bobbie, Packard Abbot

机构信息

University of West Georgia, Tanner Health System School of Nursing, Carrollton, Georgia.

The University of Iowa, College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Aug;16(4):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.09.004.

Abstract

Self-report pain assessment tools are commonly used in clinical settings to determine patients' pain intensity. The Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) is a tool that was developed for research, but also can be used in clinical settings. However, its utility in clinical settings is challenging because it uses a 13-point scale (0-12 scale) that does not align with common electronic pain scoring metrics. Therefore, this study evaluated the psychometric properties of an 11-point (0-10 scale) adaptation of the Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT-R) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the IPT-R and to determine patient preference for a self-report pain assessment tool. A descriptive, correlational design was employed. The IPT-R was compared with the original IPT and a numeric rating scale (NRS). This study was conducted in the southeastern United States with 75 adults ranging in age from 65-95 years with varying levels of cognition. Participants were primarily representative of black and white backgrounds. Participants were asked to rate current pain, worst pain during the past week, and reassessment of current pain after 10-minute intervals using three scales (IPT-R, IPT, and NRS) presented in random order. Participants were asked to identify the tool preferred (the easiest to use and that best represented their pain intensity). Spearman-rank correlations were performed to determine convergent validity and test-retest reliability. Based on the results of this preliminary study, the IPT-R has good validity and reliability. The participants in this sample preferred the IPT-R over the original IPT (0-12 scale) and the traditional NRS (0-10 scale). Clinicians may consider using this tool with diverse older patients to assess pain intensity.

摘要

自我报告疼痛评估工具在临床环境中常用于确定患者的疼痛强度。爱荷华疼痛温度计(IPT)是一种为研究而开发的工具,但也可用于临床环境。然而,它在临床环境中的实用性具有挑战性,因为它使用的是13分制(0 - 12分),与常见的电子疼痛评分指标不一致。因此,本研究评估了爱荷华疼痛温度计11分制(0 - 10分)改编版(IPT - R)的心理测量特性,以评估IPT - R的心理测量特性,并确定患者对自我报告疼痛评估工具的偏好。采用了描述性、相关性设计。将IPT - R与原始IPT和数字评分量表(NRS)进行比较。本研究在美国东南部对75名年龄在65 - 95岁、认知水平各异的成年人进行。参与者主要代表黑人和白人背景。要求参与者使用随机呈现的三种量表(IPT - R、IPT和NRS)对当前疼痛、过去一周内最严重的疼痛以及10分钟间隔后的当前疼痛重新评估进行评分。要求参与者指出更喜欢的工具(最容易使用且最能代表其疼痛强度的工具)。进行Spearman等级相关性分析以确定收敛效度和重测信度。基于这项初步研究的结果,IPT - R具有良好的效度和信度。该样本中的参与者更喜欢IPT - R,而不是原始的IPT(0 - 12分制)和传统的NRS(0 - 10分制)。临床医生可考虑对不同的老年患者使用此工具来评估疼痛强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验