Spöler Felix, Kray Oya, Kray Stefan, Panfil Claudia, Schrage Norbert F
Institute of Semiconductor Electronics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Institute of Semiconductor Electronics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany and Centre for Technology Transfer in Ophthalmology, Aachen, Germany.
Altern Lab Anim. 2015 Jul;43(3):163-79. doi: 10.1177/026119291504300306.
Ocular irritation testing is a common requirement for the classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals (substances and mixtures). The in vivo Draize rabbit eye test (OECD Test Guideline 405) is considered to be the regulatory reference method for the classification of chemicals according to their potential to induce eye injury. In the Draize test, chemicals are applied to rabbit eyes in vivo, and changes are monitored over time. If no damage is observed, the chemical is not categorised. Otherwise, the classification depends on the severity and reversibility of the damage. Alternative test methods have to be designed to match the classifications from the in vivo reference method. However, observation of damage reversibility is usually not possible in vitro. Within the present study, a new organotypic method based on rabbit corneas obtained from food production is demonstrated to close this gap. The Ex Vivo Eye Irritation Test (EVEIT) retains the full biochemical activity of the corneal epithelium, epithelial stem cells and endothelium. This permits the in-depth analysis of ocular chemical trauma beyond that achievable by using established in vitro methods. In particular, the EVEIT is the first test to permit the direct monitoring of recovery of all corneal layers after damage. To develop a prediction model for the EVEIT that is comparable to the GHS system, 37 reference chemicals were analysed. The experimental data were used to derive a three-level potency ranking of eye irritation and corrosion that best fits the GHS categorisation. In vivo data available in the literature were used for comparison. When compared with GHS classification predictions, the overall accuracy of the three-level potency ranking was 78%. The classification of chemicals as irritating versus non-irritating resulted in 96% sensitivity, 91% specificity and 95% accuracy.
眼刺激试验是化学品(物质和混合物)分类、标签和包装的一项常见要求。体内Draize兔眼试验(经合组织试验准则405)被认为是根据化学品诱发眼损伤的可能性对其进行分类的监管参考方法。在Draize试验中,将化学品应用于兔眼体内,并随时间监测变化情况。如果未观察到损伤,则该化学品不进行分类。否则,分类取决于损伤的严重程度和可逆性。必须设计替代试验方法以匹配体内参考方法的分类。然而,在体外通常无法观察到损伤的可逆性。在本研究中,一种基于从食品生产中获取的兔角膜的新型器官型方法被证明可以弥补这一差距。离体眼刺激试验(EVEIT)保留了角膜上皮、上皮干细胞和内皮的全部生化活性。这使得能够对眼化学创伤进行比使用现有体外方法更深入的分析。特别是,EVEIT是第一个能够直接监测损伤后所有角膜层恢复情况的试验。为了开发一个与全球统一制度(GHS)系统相当的EVEIT预测模型,对37种参考化学品进行了分析。实验数据用于得出最符合GHS分类的眼刺激和腐蚀的三级效力排名。使用文献中可用的体内数据进行比较。与GHS分类预测相比,三级效力排名的总体准确率为78%。将化学品分类为刺激性与非刺激性时,敏感性为96%,特异性为91%,准确率为95%。