Gerner Ingrid, Liebsch Manfred, Spielmann Horst
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Jun;33(3):215-37. doi: 10.1177/026119290503300307.
Huggins has reported on the current situation relating to the development of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test with rabbits, and an ECVAM Working Group have reviewed the efforts needed in order to replace this animal test within the next 10 years by using the results of non-animal assessment methods. Our report reviews regulatory experience gained over the last 20 years with the EU chemicals notification procedure with respect to the assessment of eye lesions observed in Draize tests. The nature of eye lesions and their importance for classification and labelling of possible hazards to human eyes are evaluated and discussed, with a view to promoting the development of specific in vitro assays which are able to discriminate between eye damage, moderate eye irritation, and minor irritation effects which are completely reversible within a few days. Structural alerts for the prediction of eye irritation/corrosion hazards to be classified and labelled according to international classification criteria, are presented, which should be validated in accordance with internationally agreed (OECD) principles for (Q)SAR system validation. Physicochemical limit values for prediction of the absence of any eye irritation potential relevant for human health can make available a definition of the applicability domains of alternative methods developed for the replacement of the Draize eye irritation test.
哈金斯报告了用兔进行的德莱兹眼刺激试验替代方法的发展现状,欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)的一个工作组已审查了在未来10年内利用非动物评估方法的结果取代该动物试验所需做出的努力。我们的报告回顾了过去20年欧盟化学品通报程序在德莱兹试验中观察到的眼部损伤评估方面的监管经验。对眼部损伤的性质及其对人类眼睛可能危害的分类和标签的重要性进行了评估和讨论,以期推动能够区分眼部损伤、中度眼刺激和在几天内完全可逆的轻度刺激效应的特定体外试验的发展。提出了根据国际分类标准对眼刺激/腐蚀危害进行分类和标签预测的结构警示,应根据国际商定的(经合组织)(Q)SAR系统验证原则对其进行验证。预测对人类健康无任何眼刺激潜力的物理化学极限值可给出为取代德莱兹眼刺激试验而开发的替代方法的适用范围定义。