• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型牙科密封剂的氟释放与再充氟能力

Fluoride release and recharging ability of new dental sealants.

作者信息

Dionysopoulos D, Sfeikos T, Tolidis K

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016 Feb;17(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0200-1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1007/s40368-015-0200-1
PMID:26264161
Abstract

AIM

This in vitro investigation was to evaluate the fluoride release and recharge abilities of three recently introduced dental fissure sealants (FS).

METHODS

Three dental FS were assessed: Teethmate F-1 (Kuraray), Fissurit F (Voco), BeautiSealant (Shofu), and a conventional glass ionomer cement FX-II (Shofu) as a control. Eight cylindrical specimens (7 × 2 mm) of each material were made and immersed individually in 5 ml de-ionized water in plastic containers. Fluoride release of the tested materials was evaluated during the experimental period (28 days) utilising a fluoride ion-selective electrode. At the end of the test period, the specimens were soaked for 5 min in a fluoride solution (0.05 % NaF) and fluoride release was evaluated for the next 5 days. The data were statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test and the level of significance was preset at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The total fluoride release over the 28-day period for each material was: FX-II (408.6 ± 45.66 μg/cm(2)) > Teethmate F-1 (89.45 ± 12.32 μg/cm(2)) > Fissurit F (68.62 ± 8.72 μg/cm(2)) > BeautiSealant (33.32 ± 4.91 μg/cm(2)), (p < 0.05). After the re-fluoridation of the specimens with 0.05 % NaF solution the cumulative fluoride re-release during the 5-day period for each material was: FX-II (99.53 ± 13.21 μg/cm(2)) > Teethmate F-1 (9.76 ± 1.62 μg/cm(2)) > BeautiSealant (5.69 ± 0.89 μg/cm(2)) > Fissurit F (4.76 ± 0.72 μg/cm(2)), (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The three tested sealants exhibited different capabilities to release and uptake fluoride ions after re-fluoridation but significantly lower than the glass ionomer tested.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在评估三种新推出的牙科窝沟封闭剂(FS)的氟释放和再充氟能力。

方法

评估三种牙科窝沟封闭剂:Teethmate F-1(可乐丽)、Fissurit F(VOCO)、BeautiSealant(松风),并以传统玻璃离子水门汀FX-II(松风)作为对照。每种材料制作8个圆柱形试件(7×2毫米),分别浸入塑料容器中的5毫升去离子水中。在实验期(28天)内,使用氟离子选择性电极评估受试材料的氟释放情况。在试验期结束时,将试件在氟溶液(0.05% NaF)中浸泡5分钟,然后在接下来的5天内评估氟释放情况。数据采用单因素方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平预设为α = 0.05。

结果

每种材料在28天内的总氟释放量为:FX-II(408.6±45.66μg/cm²)> Teethmate F-1(89.45±12.32μg/cm²)> Fissurit F(68.62±8.72μg/cm²)> BeautiSealant(3,32±4.91μg/cm²),(p < 0.05)。用0.05% NaF溶液对试件进行再充氟后,每种材料在5天内的累积氟再释放量为:FX-II(99.53±13.21μg/cm²)> Teethmate F-1(9.76±1.62μg/cm²)> BeautiSealant(5.69±0.89μg/cm²)> Fissurit F(4.76±0.72μg/cm²),(p < 0.05)。

结论

三种受试封闭剂在再充氟后表现出不同的氟离子释放和摄取能力,但明显低于受试的玻璃离子水门汀。

相似文献

1
Fluoride release and recharging ability of new dental sealants.新型牙科密封剂的氟释放与再充氟能力
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016 Feb;17(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0200-1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
2
Fluoride release and fluoride-recharging ability of three different sealants.三种不同窝沟封闭剂的氟释放及氟再充注能力
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jul-Sep;38(3):247-252. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_345_19.
3
Comparison of short-term in vitro fluoride release and recharge from four different types of pit-and-fissure sealants.四种不同类型窝沟封闭剂的短期体外氟释放与再充注比较
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2004 Aug;45(3):173-9. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.45.173.
4
Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement.修复材料和粘结水门汀的氟释放。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Aug;86(2):156-64. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116778.
5
Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.体外正畸玻璃离子水门汀黏接剂氟释放及体内釉质氟摄取。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.030.
6
Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites.各种含氟树脂复合材料的氟释放、再矿化和力学性能稳定性。
Oper Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):422-32. doi: 10.2341/10-414-L. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
7
Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite.玻璃离子聚体、复合体及树脂复合体中的氟释放与再充氟
Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009.
8
Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: an in vitro study.含氟牙膏对一种非树脂自凝玻璃离子水门汀的氟再充注能力:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jul-Sep;29(3):202-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.85812.
9
[Fluoride release and recharge properties of six restorative materials].[六种修复材料的氟释放与再充注特性]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;50(1):28-32.
10
[Release of fluoride ions into saliva from some dental materials].[某些牙科材料中氟离子向唾液的释放]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2004;50 Suppl 1:62-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Technological dental sealants: in vitro evaluation of material properties and antibiofilm potential.牙科技术密封剂:材料性能和抗生物膜潜力的体外评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05303-5.
2
Physical-Mechanical Properties and Mineral Deposition of a Pit-and-Fissure Sealant Containing Niobium-Fluoride Nanoparticles-An In Vitro Study.含铌氟化物纳米颗粒窝沟封闭剂的物理机械性能及矿物质沉积——一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;17(21):5378. doi: 10.3390/ma17215378.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer, Compomer, and Giomer Sealants Following Exposure to Fluoride Toothpaste and Fluoride Varnish: An Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Formulation and characterization of antibacterial fluoride-releasing sealants.抗菌氟释放封闭剂的配方与表征
Pediatr Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;35(1):E13-8.
2
Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives.当代含氟修复材料和牙科胶粘剂的氟释放和再补充能力。
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):296-304. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-144.
3
Evaluation of the remineralization potential of amorphous calcium phosphate and fluoride containing pit and fissure sealants using scanning electron microscopy.
玻璃离子水门汀、复合体和聚酸改性复合树脂封闭剂在接触含氟牙膏和氟漆后氟释放的比较评价:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):736-738. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2477.
4
Effect of Surface Pre-Reacted Glass Ionomer Containing Dental Sealant on the Inhibition of Enamel Demineralization.含表面预反应玻璃离子的牙釉质封闭剂对抑制牙釉质脱矿的作用
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Oct 14;13(4):189. doi: 10.3390/jfb13040189.
5
Remineralizing Effects of Resin-Based Dental Sealants: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.树脂基牙科密封剂的再矿化作用:体外研究的系统评价
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 17;14(4):779. doi: 10.3390/polym14040779.
6
Progression of Enamel Demineralisation Around Fissure Sealants: Optical Coherence Tomography Study.窝沟封闭剂周围釉质脱矿的进展:光相干断层扫描研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021 Dec 18;19:707-712. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2448625.
7
Comparison of Two Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants in Reducing the Incidence of Dental Caries Using a Split-Mouth Design.采用半口设计比较两种窝沟封闭剂在降低龋齿发病率方面的效果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Jun;55(2):137-146. doi: 10.15644/asc55/2/3.
8
Improvement of Pit-and-Fissure Sealant Bonding to Enamel with Subpressure Treatment.通过负压处理改善窝沟封闭剂与牙釉质的粘结
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 28;2019:5070383. doi: 10.1155/2019/5070383. eCollection 2019.
9
Sealants revisited: An efficacy battle between the two major types of sealants - A randomized controlled clinical trial.重新审视窝沟封闭剂:两种主要类型窝沟封闭剂之间的疗效较量——一项随机对照临床试验
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):36-41.
10
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An study.新型和传统释氟修复材料氟释放及再充氟潜力的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;21(6):622-626. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_338_18.
使用扫描电子显微镜评估含无定形磷酸钙和氟化物的窝沟封闭剂的再矿化潜力。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):157-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100419.
4
In vitro study of the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on remineralization in an enamel erosion model.氟释放型牙科材料对牙釉质脱矿模型再矿化影响的体外研究。
J Dent. 2012 Mar;40(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.016. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
5
Evaluation of the ion-releasing and recharging abilities of a resin-based fissure sealant containing S-PRG filler.含S-PRG填料的树脂基窝沟封闭剂的离子释放及再充电能力评估
Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):923-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-124. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
6
Conversion degree, microhardness, microleakage and fluoride release of different fissure sealants.不同窝沟封闭剂的转化率、显微硬度、微渗漏和氟释放。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010 Nov;3(8):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
7
Effect of adhesive agent and fissure morphology on the in vitro microleakage and penetrability of pit and fissure sealants.黏合剂和窝沟形态对窝沟封闭剂体外微渗漏及渗透性的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2009 Oct;40(9):763-72.
8
Influence of environmental conditions on properties of ionomeric and resin sealant materials.环境条件对离聚体和树脂密封剂材料性能的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Jul-Aug;17(4):294-300. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000400006.
9
A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers.对含新型预反应玻璃离子(PRG)填料的释氟牙科粘合剂发展的化学方法和超微形态学研究综述。
Dent Mater J. 2008 May;27(3):315-39. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.315.
10
Pit and fissure sealants in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review.窝沟封闭预防儿童和青少年龋齿:一项系统评价
J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Mar;74(2):171-7.