Suppr超能文献

经肛门内镜下切除并进入腹腔:需谨慎对待。

Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.

作者信息

Molina George, Bordeianou Liliana, Shellito Paul, Sylla Patricia

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, 5 East 98th Street Box 1249, New York, NY, 10029, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1816-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4452-y. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) can usually be managed transanally with full-thickness suture closure by experienced operators. The preliminary safety of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has been demonstrated, but the reported experience with upper rectal tumors is limited. The incidence and management of peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic surgery across various platforms have not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all transanal endoscopic resections performed at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2014 was conducted. Cases with and without peritoneal entry were evaluated with respect to transanal platform used, surgical indication, size, location and distance from the anal verge, and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 78 transanal endoscopic procedures were performed on 76 patients using the rigid transanal endoscopic operation (TEO, 65.4 %), TEM (26.9 %), and TAMIS platform (7.7 %). The most common surgical indication included endoscopically unresectable adenomas (50 %). The average distance of lesions from the anal verge (AV) was 9.6 cm (range 4-20 cm). Peritoneal entry occurred in 22 cases (28.2 %). Platform used (TAMIS vs. rigid, p < 0.05), mean distance from the AV (p < 0.0001), location along the rectum (p = 0.01), and mean specimen size (p = 0.01) were associated with a higher likelihood of peritoneal entry. All rectal defects associated with peritoneal entry were successfully closed transanally except for two (TEM and TEO) cases that required conversion to laparoscopic low anterior resection and laparoscopic Hartmann's, respectively. There were four TAMIS cases that required conversion to TEO platforms.

CONCLUSION

In this high-risk TEM, TEO, and TAMIS series (one-third of rectal lesions located in the upper rectum), 91 % of all peritoneal entries were managed transanally without increased morbidity. TAMIS for upper rectal lesions was associated with a high risk of complicated peritoneal entry requiring conversion to a rigid platform.

摘要

背景

经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)过程中出现的腹膜破损通常可由经验丰富的术者经肛门用全层缝合关闭来处理。经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)的初步安全性已得到证实,但有关上段直肠肿瘤的报道经验有限。此前尚未对不同平台经肛门内镜手术中腹膜破损的发生率及处理方法进行评估。

方法

对2008年1月至2014年12月在单一机构进行的所有经肛门内镜切除术的前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性分析。对有或无腹膜破损的病例,就所使用的经肛门平台、手术指征、大小、位置及距肛缘的距离以及术后并发症发生率进行评估。

结果

使用刚性经肛门内镜手术(TEO,65.4%)、TEM(26.9%)和TAMIS平台(7.7%)对76例患者共进行了78例经肛门内镜手术。最常见手术指征包括内镜下不可切除的腺瘤(50%)。病变距肛缘(AV)的平均距离为9.6cm(范围4 - 20cm)。22例(28.2%)出现腹膜破损。所使用的平台(TAMIS与刚性平台相比,p < 0.05)、距AV的平均距离(p < 0.0001)、沿直肠的位置(p = 0.01)以及标本平均大小(p = 0.01)与腹膜破损的较高可能性相关。除2例(TEM和TEO)分别需要转为腹腔镜低位前切除术和腹腔镜Hartmann手术外,所有与腹膜破损相关的直肠缺损均成功经肛门关闭。有4例TAMIS病例需要转为TEO平台。

结论

在这个高风险的TEM、TEO和TAMIS系列(三分之一的直肠病变位于上段直肠)中,91%的腹膜破损经肛门处理,且发病率未增加。TAMIS用于上段直肠病变时,出现复杂腹膜破损并需要转为刚性平台的风险较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验