Vale G L, Williams L, Neal Webb S, Schapiro S J, Brosnan S F
Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
Department of Comparative Medicine, Michale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, U.S.A.
Anim Behav. 2022 Nov;193:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
Primates of several species respond negatively to receiving less preferred rewards than a partner for completing the same task (inequity responses), either rejecting rewards or refusing to participate in the task when disadvantaged. This has been linked to cooperation, with species that cooperate frequently refusing to participate in inequity tasks (the 'cooperation hypothesis'). However, inequity is a social response, and previous research has involved dyads, precluding studying the effects of additional social partners. While dyads allow for tighter control in experimental settings, dyadic interactions in nature do not take place in a social vacuum, so understanding the role of the social context is needed to verify that the pattern of results supports the cooperation hypothesis. Here we focus on Bolivian squirrel monkeys, , a highly social species that does not generally cooperate and has not responded to inequity in previous dyadic research, although they do respond to receiving a lower reward than they expected. In the current study, we provide a more nuanced test by studying female Bolivian squirrel monkeys, the demographic most likely to cooperate in both field and laboratory contexts, in a more socially relevant group setting. For some reward values, females responded in both the inequity condition, rejecting less preferred rewards when they were disadvantaged relative to their social group, and a contrast condition, wherein all animals received a lower reward than they expected, making it difficult to disentangle contrast from inequity. As in capuchin monkeys, refusals increased when monkeys were to receive low-value rewards compared to medium-value rewards. These results suggest that the relationship between cooperation and inequity responses may be more nuanced than previously suggested, with demographic, social context and reward value potentially influencing outcomes even within species.
几个物种的灵长类动物在完成相同任务时,如果得到的奖励不如同伴,就会产生负面反应(不公平反应),处于劣势时要么拒绝奖励,要么拒绝参与任务。这与合作有关,经常合作的物种会拒绝参与不公平任务(“合作假说”)。然而,不公平是一种社会反应,之前的研究涉及二元组,排除了研究额外社会伙伴的影响。虽然二元组在实验环境中便于更严格的控制,但自然界中的二元互动并非发生在社会真空中,因此需要了解社会背景的作用,以验证结果模式是否支持合作假说。在这里,我们关注玻利维亚松鼠猴,这是一种高度社会化的物种,通常不合作,在之前的二元研究中也没有对不公平做出反应,尽管它们确实会对得到比预期更低的奖励做出反应。在当前的研究中,我们通过在更具社会相关性的群体环境中研究玻利维亚雌性松鼠猴(在野外和实验室环境中最有可能合作的群体),进行了更细致入微的测试。对于某些奖励价值,雌性在不公平条件下(相对于社会群体处于劣势时拒绝不太喜欢的奖励)以及对照条件下(所有动物得到的奖励都比预期低)都会做出反应,这使得很难区分对照和不公平。与卷尾猴一样,与中等价值奖励相比,当猴子要获得低价值奖励时,拒绝行为会增加。这些结果表明,合作与不公平反应之间的关系可能比之前认为的更加细致入微,即使在同一物种内,群体特征、社会背景和奖励价值也可能影响结果。