Suppr超能文献

[特定鼻反应性在血管运动性鼻炎诊断中的应用:鼻测压研究]

[Aspecific rhinoreactivity in the diagnosis of vasomotor rhinopathy: rhinomanometric study].

作者信息

Gregorio A, Castellano F

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1989 Sep-Oct;9(5):497-502.

PMID:2626954
Abstract

The authors examined 70 patients divided into three groups: 15 normal, 20 affected by allergic rhinitis in a non critical period, 35 with vasomotor rhinitis. The aim was to evaluate the reactions induced through cold water stimulation (5 degrees C) and comparing them to the results obtained after lateral recumbent positional rhinomanometry. It was found that nasal provocation significantly modified nasal resistance in subjects with vasomotor rhinitis (81% for positional testing, 63% with cold water 5 degrees). This would justify nasal mucosa hyperreactivity due to the prevailing parasympathetic nervous system. Patients with allergic rhinitis showed fewer cases of pathological response (44% for positional testing, 32% for cold water provocation). According to the results obtained and the comparison made, the authors consider the aspecific nasal provocation test as unsuitable for use alone in the diagnosis of vasomotor rhinitis. However, based on their experience, the authors underline the fact that, since this method can demonstrate certain aspects of nasal mucous disreactivity, it is an important tool to be included in the full diagnostic approach to chronic rhinitis.

摘要

作者对70名患者进行了检查,这些患者被分为三组:15名正常人,20名处于非关键期的变应性鼻炎患者,35名血管运动性鼻炎患者。目的是评估冷水刺激(5摄氏度)引起的反应,并将其与侧卧位鼻测压法所得结果进行比较。结果发现,鼻激发试验显著改变了血管运动性鼻炎患者的鼻阻力(体位试验为81%,5摄氏度冷水刺激为63%)。这可以解释由于主要的副交感神经系统导致的鼻黏膜高反应性。变应性鼻炎患者出现病理反应的情况较少(体位试验为44%,冷水激发试验为32%)。根据所得结果及进行的比较,作者认为非特异性鼻激发试验不适用于单独诊断血管运动性鼻炎。然而,基于他们的经验,作者强调,由于该方法可以证明鼻黏液反应性异常的某些方面,它是慢性鼻炎完整诊断方法中应包含的一项重要工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验