Gregorio A, Castellano F
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1989 Sep-Oct;9(5):497-502.
The authors examined 70 patients divided into three groups: 15 normal, 20 affected by allergic rhinitis in a non critical period, 35 with vasomotor rhinitis. The aim was to evaluate the reactions induced through cold water stimulation (5 degrees C) and comparing them to the results obtained after lateral recumbent positional rhinomanometry. It was found that nasal provocation significantly modified nasal resistance in subjects with vasomotor rhinitis (81% for positional testing, 63% with cold water 5 degrees). This would justify nasal mucosa hyperreactivity due to the prevailing parasympathetic nervous system. Patients with allergic rhinitis showed fewer cases of pathological response (44% for positional testing, 32% for cold water provocation). According to the results obtained and the comparison made, the authors consider the aspecific nasal provocation test as unsuitable for use alone in the diagnosis of vasomotor rhinitis. However, based on their experience, the authors underline the fact that, since this method can demonstrate certain aspects of nasal mucous disreactivity, it is an important tool to be included in the full diagnostic approach to chronic rhinitis.
作者对70名患者进行了检查,这些患者被分为三组:15名正常人,20名处于非关键期的变应性鼻炎患者,35名血管运动性鼻炎患者。目的是评估冷水刺激(5摄氏度)引起的反应,并将其与侧卧位鼻测压法所得结果进行比较。结果发现,鼻激发试验显著改变了血管运动性鼻炎患者的鼻阻力(体位试验为81%,5摄氏度冷水刺激为63%)。这可以解释由于主要的副交感神经系统导致的鼻黏膜高反应性。变应性鼻炎患者出现病理反应的情况较少(体位试验为44%,冷水激发试验为32%)。根据所得结果及进行的比较,作者认为非特异性鼻激发试验不适用于单独诊断血管运动性鼻炎。然而,基于他们的经验,作者强调,由于该方法可以证明鼻黏液反应性异常的某些方面,它是慢性鼻炎完整诊断方法中应包含的一项重要工具。