Suppr超能文献

动脉内血栓切除术:侵入性治疗是否比单纯静脉溶栓能带来更好的治疗效果?

Intra-arterial thrombectomy: does invasive treatment lead to better outcomes than intravenous thrombolysis alone?

作者信息

Cherian Laurel, Cutting Shawna, Song Sarah

机构信息

Section of Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 1121, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA,

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Oct;17(10):82. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0639-z.

Abstract

Intravenous thrombolysis is considered to be standard of care for acute ischemic stroke patients arriving within 3-4.5 h of stroke symptom onset. Recently, endovascular therapies have been proposed to extend and enhance stroke outcomes by targeting large vessel occlusions. Different radiologic methods, time windows, and treatment tools have delineated differences between trials. Overall, intravenous thrombolysis remains the treatment of choice for all acute ischemic stroke patients, with a small subset benefiting from additional endovascular therapy. Endovascular therapy remains a viable singular option for patients with large vessel occlusion unable to receive thrombolysis.

摘要

静脉溶栓被认为是卒中症状发作后3 - 4.5小时内就诊的急性缺血性卒中患者的标准治疗方法。最近,血管内治疗已被提出,旨在通过针对大血管闭塞来扩大和改善卒中治疗效果。不同的影像学方法、时间窗和治疗工具在各试验之间划出了差异。总体而言,静脉溶栓仍然是所有急性缺血性卒中患者的首选治疗方法,一小部分患者可从额外的血管内治疗中获益。血管内治疗对于无法接受溶栓的大血管闭塞患者仍然是一种可行的单一治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验