Suppr超能文献

健康与患病儿童非侵入性即时血红蛋白估计的有效性——一项方法比较研究

Validity of non-invasive point-of-care hemoglobin estimation in healthy and sick children-a method comparison study.

作者信息

Bhat Aditya, Upadhyay Amit, Jaiswal Vijay, Chawla Deepak, Singh Dharamveer, Kumar Mithilesh, Yadav C P

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, LLRM Medical College, Meerut, Uttar, Pradesh, 250002, India.

Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;175(2):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2602-9. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study was conducted at a tertiary care center in northern India to evaluate the validity of non-invasive transcutaneous hemoglobin estimation in healthy and sick children in comparison to hemoglobin estimation by traditional lab method. A method comparison study was conducted including 150 subjects. Enrolled patients included 80 neonates with average age of 3.9 ± 2.1 days, and 70 children with average age of 5.8 ± 2 years. Each population (newborn and children) comprised of almost equal numbers of healthy and critically ill patients with shock. Hemoglobin (Hb) was estimated on enrolment by transcutaneous spectrophotometry (SpHb) and traditional automated lab analyzer (Hb-Lab). Difference between Hb levels by the two methods (called bias) was measured and analyzed using Bland-Altman method. Out of 148 data pairs analyzed, bias between SpHb and Hb-Lab was -1.52 ± 1.91 g/dl (mean ± SD). SpHb showed excellent positive correlation with Hb-Lab (r = 0.94 (p < 0.001)) and good visual agreement on Bland-Altman plots. Bias was higher in sick subjects with shock as compared to healthy ones in both neonatal and pediatric population (-2.31 ± 2.21 g/dl versus -0.77 ± 1.2 g/dl, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SpHb showed good accuracy and correlated well with lab estimated Hb levels in healthy children. However, in children with impaired peripheral perfusion, its diagnostic accuracy was inadequate to justify routine use for quantification of severity of anemia and making transfusion decisions solely on non-invasive estimation of hemoglobin.

WHAT IS KNOWN

Non-invasive hemoglobin estimation is a relatively new and novel method which has given mixed results regarding its potential efficacy in adults. There is limited data regarding usefulness and accuracy of non-invasive Hb estimation by SpHb in sick neonates and children.

WHAT IS NEW

Non-invasive Hb estimation by SpHb monitor is reasonably accurate in healthy neonates and children. It can be used in critically ill children and neonates, but in conjunction with lab confirmation of Hb values.

摘要

未标注

本研究在印度北部的一家三级医疗中心进行,旨在评估与传统实验室方法测定血红蛋白相比,非侵入性经皮血红蛋白测定在健康和患病儿童中的有效性。进行了一项方法比较研究,纳入150名受试者。入选患者包括80名平均年龄为3.9±2.1天的新生儿,以及70名平均年龄为5.8±2岁的儿童。每个群体(新生儿和儿童)中健康和患有休克的危重症患者数量几乎相等。入院时通过经皮分光光度法(SpHb)和传统自动实验室分析仪(Hb-Lab)测定血红蛋白(Hb)。使用Bland-Altman方法测量并分析两种方法测得的Hb水平差异(称为偏差)。在分析的148对数据中,SpHb与Hb-Lab之间的偏差为-1.52±1.91 g/dl(均值±标准差)。SpHb与Hb-Lab显示出极好的正相关性(r = 0.94(p < 0.001)),并且在Bland-Altman图上有良好的视觉一致性。在新生儿和儿科人群中,患有休克的患病受试者的偏差高于健康受试者(分别为-2.31±2.21 g/dl和-0.77±1.2 g/dl)。

结论

SpHb在健康儿童中显示出良好的准确性,并且与实验室测定的Hb水平相关性良好。然而,在周围灌注受损的儿童中,其诊断准确性不足以证明仅基于非侵入性血红蛋白估计来常规用于量化贫血严重程度和做出输血决策是合理的。

已知信息

非侵入性血红蛋白估计是一种相对新颖的方法,其在成人中的潜在疗效结果不一。关于SpHb在患病新生儿和儿童中进行非侵入性Hb估计的有用性和准确性的数据有限。

新发现

通过SpHb监测仪进行的非侵入性Hb估计在健康新生儿和儿童中相当准确。它可用于危重症儿童和新生儿,但需结合Hb值的实验室确认结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验