Riess Matthias L, Pagel Paul S
Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; TVHS VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1167-71. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.148. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
This study compared noninvasively measured hemoglobin and arterial hemoglobin before and after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery or valve surgery.
Observational study with retrospective data analysis.
Veterans Affairs hospital.
Thirty-five men.
None.
Hemoglobin values were measured noninvasively by co-oximetry to corresponding arterial hemoglobin concentrations taken at clinically relevant time points chosen at the discretion of the cardiac anesthesiologist. Thirty-five and 27 pooled pairs of data were obtained before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, respectively. Arterial hemoglobin concentration was analyzed using i-STAT CG8+test cartridges routinely used in the authors' operating rooms and those of other institutions. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis revealed a significant positive bias, wide limits of agreement, and low correlation coefficients between the noninvasive and arterial hemoglobin measurements. These findings were especially notable after compared with before cardiopulmonary bypass.
The results suggested that noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin overestimates arterial hemoglobin by almost 1 g/dL when compared to iSTAT. A lack of precision also was observed with noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin, especially after cardiopulmonary bypass. These findings supported the contention that sole reliance on noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin for transfusion decisions in cardiac surgery patients may be inappropriate.
本研究比较了接受冠状动脉或瓣膜手术患者在体外循环前后通过无创测量的血红蛋白和动脉血红蛋白水平。
采用回顾性数据分析的观察性研究。
退伍军人事务医院。
35名男性。
无。
通过共血氧测定法无创测量血红蛋白值,以对应心脏麻醉医生自行选择的临床相关时间点采集的动脉血红蛋白浓度。体外循环前后分别获得35组和27组合并数据对。使用作者手术室及其他机构常规使用的i-STAT CG8+测试盒分析动脉血红蛋白浓度。线性回归和布兰德-奥特曼分析显示,无创测量与动脉血红蛋白测量之间存在显著正偏差、较宽的一致性界限和较低的相关系数。与体外循环前相比,这些发现尤为明显。
结果表明,与iSTAT相比,血红蛋白的无创测量高估动脉血红蛋白近1 g/dL。血红蛋白的无创测量也缺乏精确性,尤其是在体外循环后。这些发现支持了这样的观点,即单纯依靠血红蛋白的无创测量来为心脏手术患者做出输血决策可能是不合适的。