Baier Rosa R, Cooper Emily, Wysocki Andrea, Gravenstein Stefan, Clark Melissa
Brown University ; Healthcentric Advisors.
Healthcentric Advisors.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 May 13;3(2):1166. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1166. eCollection 2015.
Despite the investment in public reporting for a number of healthcare settings, evidence indicates that consumers do not routinely use available data to select providers. This suggests that existing reports do not adequately incorporate recommendations for consumer-facing reports or web applications.
Healthcentric Advisors and Brown University undertook a multi-phased approach to create a consumer-facing home health web application in Rhode Island. This included reviewing the evidence base review to identify design recommendations and then creating a paper prototype and wireframe. We performed qualitative research to iteratively test our proposed user interface with two user groups, home health consumers and hospital case managers, refining our design to create the final web application.
To test our prototype, we conducted two focus groups, with a total of 13 consumers, and 28 case manager interviews. Both user groups responded favorably to the prototype, with the majority commenting that they felt this type of tool would be useful. Case managers suggested revisions to ensure the application conformed to laws requiring Medicare patients to have the freedom to choose among providers and could be incorporated into hospital workflow. After incorporating changes and creating the wireframe, we conducted usability testing interviews with 14 home health consumers and six hospital case managers. We found that consumers needed prompting to navigate through the wireframe; they demonstrated confusion through both their words and body language. As a result, we modified the web application's sequence, navigation, and function to provide additional instructions and prompts.
Although we designed our web application for low literacy and low health literacy, using recommendations from the evidence base, we overestimated the extent to which older adults were familiar with using computers. Some of our key learnings and recommendations run counter to general web design principles, leading us to believe that such guidelines need to be adapted for this user group. As web applications proliferate, it is important to ensure those who are most vulnerable-who have the least knowledge and the lowest literacy, health literacy, and computer proficiency-can access, understand, and use them.
In order for the investment in public reporting to produce value, consumer-facing web applications need to be designed to address end users' unique strengths and limitations. Our findings may help others to build consumer-facing tools or technology targeted to a predominantly older population. We encourage others designing consumer-facing web technologies to critically evaluate their assumptions about user interface design, particularly if they are designing tools for older adults, and to test products with their end users.
尽管在许多医疗环境中都对公开报告进行了投入,但有证据表明,消费者并不经常使用现有数据来选择医疗服务提供者。这表明现有报告并未充分纳入针对面向消费者的报告或网络应用程序的建议。
Healthcentric Advisors和布朗大学采用多阶段方法,在罗德岛创建了一个面向消费者的家庭健康网络应用程序。这包括审查证据库以确定设计建议,然后创建纸质原型和线框图。我们进行了定性研究,以迭代方式与两个用户群体(家庭健康消费者和医院病例管理人员)测试我们提议的用户界面,完善我们的设计以创建最终的网络应用程序。
为了测试我们的原型,我们进行了两个焦点小组讨论,共有13名消费者参与,还对28名病例管理人员进行了访谈。两个用户群体对原型的反应都很积极,大多数人表示他们认为这种工具会很有用。病例管理人员建议进行修订,以确保该应用程序符合要求医疗保险患者有权在医疗服务提供者之间自由选择的法律规定,并能融入医院工作流程。在纳入修改并创建线框图后,我们对14名家庭健康消费者和6名医院病例管理人员进行了可用性测试访谈。我们发现消费者需要提示才能在线框图中进行操作;他们通过言语和肢体语言都表现出困惑。因此,我们修改了网络应用程序的顺序、导航和功能,以提供更多指导和提示。
尽管我们根据证据库的建议为低文化水平和低健康素养人群设计了网络应用程序,但我们高估了老年人对使用计算机的熟悉程度。我们的一些关键经验教训和建议与一般网页设计原则相悖,这使我们认为此类准则需要针对该用户群体进行调整。随着网络应用程序的激增,确保那些最脆弱的人群(知识最少、文化水平、健康素养和计算机操作能力最低的人群)能够访问、理解和使用这些应用程序非常重要。
为了使对公开报告的投入产生价值,面向消费者的网络应用程序需要设计成能够解决终端用户独特的优势和局限性。我们的研究结果可能有助于其他人构建针对主要为老年人群体的面向消费者的工具或技术。我们鼓励其他设计面向消费者的网络技术的人批判性地评估他们对用户界面设计的假设,特别是如果他们正在为老年人设计工具,并与终端用户一起测试产品。