• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向自闭症网络用户的AASPIRE网络可访问性指南的制定。

Development of the AASPIRE Web Accessibility Guidelines for Autistic Web Users.

作者信息

Raymaker Dora M, Kapp Steven K, McDonald Katherine E, Weiner Michael, Ashkenazy Elesia, Nicolaidis Christina

机构信息

School of Social Work, Regional Research Institute, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.

Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Autism Adulthood. 2019 Jun 1;1(2):146-157. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0020. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1089/aut.2018.0020
PMID:32292887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6485264/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Websites figure predominantly in everyday life. However, many websites remain inaccessible to autistic people, and existing efforts to improve accessibility are in early stages, do not directly include autistic users in their development, or have not been empirically evaluated. The Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education (AASPIRE) used a community-based participatory research approach to create a website to improve health care access for autistic adults. We used the creation of that website as a "living laboratory" to develop the AASPIRE Web Accessibility Guidelines for Autistic Web Users. Our guidelines are grounded in accessibility theory, had autistic end-user involvement at all stages, and were empirically evaluated through a usability study and evaluation surveys. We incorporated what we learned into the design of the website, and compiled the accessibility information into a set of guidelines. The guidelines offer recommendations for increasing the physical, intellectual, and social acceptability of websites for use by autistic adults. In the evaluation of the website by 170 autistic end users, nearly all indicated it was easy to use (97%), easy to understand (95%), important (97%), and useful (96%). Ninety-two percent would recommend it to a friend, and 95% would recommend it to a health care provider. There were no significant associations between usability or understandability and education level, receipt of help using the site, browser type (e.g., IE or Safari), or device type (e.g., PC or tablet). We recommend using the guidelines to improve website accessibility for autistic Internet users.

LAY SUMMARY

This guideline is a summary of the accessibility features we identified and implemented during the course of our study. None of these items were difficult or expensive for us to implement. They did not require special expertise beyond basic web programming and technical communications skills. We recommend that anyone seeking to create accessible websites for autistic users follow the Academic Autism Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education (AASPIRE) Web Accessibility Guideline in addition to broader web and communications standards and principles.Physical accessibility:Provide at least one low-contrast neutral color palette option to accommodate sensitive vision.Provide a selection of color palettes, including one with a dark background and one with a light background, again to accommodate color and contrast sensitivity.Provide a no-style option (i.e., no cascading style sheets (CSS) to accommodate browser customization and users who prefer no stylistic formatting.Provide simple consistent navigation and highly consistent site behavior for increased ease of operation.Avoid textured backgrounds, moving images, decorative elements that do not convey information, and other visual and/or sonic "clutter"; these types of elements may make the site difficult or impossible to comprehend.Provide smaller font sizes in addition to larger ones; large font sizes may make the page appear cluttered and difficult to read.Use a plain accessible sans-serif font (e.g., Arial) for ease of readability.Intellectual accessibility:Use the simplest interface possible for ease of understanding.Use simple concrete icons or images to communicate redundant information with text, and accommodate multiple ways of understanding information.Clearly label site elements with their purpose everywhere on the site, even if it seems redundant, to make navigation and site functionality easier to follow.Provide concrete examples where applicable to accommodate difficulties in understanding abstractions or generalizations.Minimize scrolling so the user does not need to rely on assumptions about content to guess what might be on the page.Show all important features and site navigation (as opposed to within combo box drop-down areas) so the user does not need to rely on assumptions to guess whether the item exists and how to access it. For example, completely visible list boxes or radio buttons can be used instead of combo boxes.Make content as short as possible without sacrificing precision and specificity, to reduce cognitive burden.Social accessibility:Be specific and precise in language use; avoid colloquialisms, idioms, and ambiguity to accommodate difficulties with language pragmatics.Explain the reason behind any nonstandard instructions or unusual information; provide additional pragmatic context to accommodate difficulties with language pragmatics.Provide alternatives to definitive response items on surveys and forms, for example, "do not know," "do not wish to say," or "not applicable," to reduce frustration for not being able to produce an exact answer.Use FAQ formats to organize complex information to enhance clarity as to why the information might be useful to the user and how it connects to their life.Define terms that might have different meanings depending on social context, or which might be jargon related to a specialized field (e.g., "drug interactions" and "health care providers"), to accommodate difficulties with language pragmatics.Be mindful of autistic culture and community preferences, including the language used to describe autism and how community-based symbols and history might influence content and perception of site credibility.

摘要

未标注

网站在日常生活中占据主导地位。然而,许多网站自闭症患者仍无法访问,现有的改善网站可访问性的努力尚处于早期阶段,在开发过程中没有直接让自闭症用户参与,或者尚未经过实证评估。学术自闭症谱系研究与教育合作组织(AASPIRE)采用基于社区的参与式研究方法创建了一个网站,以改善自闭症成年人获得医疗保健服务的状况。我们将该网站的创建作为一个“活实验室”,来制定面向自闭症网络用户的AASPIRE网络可访问性指南。我们的指南以可访问性理论为基础,在各个阶段都有自闭症最终用户的参与,并通过可用性研究和评估调查进行了实证评估。我们将所学内容融入网站设计,并将可访问性信息汇编成一套指南。这些指南为提高网站对自闭症成年人使用的身体、智力和社会可接受性提供了建议。在170名自闭症最终用户对该网站的评估中,几乎所有人都表示该网站易于使用(97%)、易于理解(95%)、重要(97%)且有用(96%)。92%的人会向朋友推荐它,95%的人会向医疗保健提供者推荐它。可用性或可理解性与教育水平、使用该网站时是否接受帮助、浏览器类型(如IE或Safari)或设备类型(如个人电脑或平板电脑)之间没有显著关联。我们建议使用这些指南来提高自闭症互联网用户的网站可访问性。

简要总结

本指南总结了我们在研究过程中确定并实施的可访问性特征。对我们来说,实施这些项目没有一个是困难或昂贵的。它们不需要超出基本网页编程和技术沟通技能的特殊专业知识。我们建议,除了更广泛的网络和沟通标准及原则外,任何希望为自闭症用户创建可访问网站的人都应遵循学术自闭症谱系研究与教育合作组织(AASPIRE)网络可访问性指南。

身体可访问性

提供至少一种低对比度中性调色板选项,以适应敏感视力。

提供多种调色板选择,包括一个深色背景和一个浅色背景的,同样是为了适应对颜色和对比度的敏感度。

提供无样式选项(即没有层叠样式表(CSS)),以适应浏览器定制和喜欢无样式格式的用户。

提供简单一致的导航和高度一致的网站行为,以提高操作的简便性。

避免使用有纹理的背景、移动图像、不传达信息的装饰元素以及其他视觉和/或声音“杂乱元素”;这些类型的元素可能会使网站难以理解或无法理解。

除了较大字体尺寸外,还提供较小字体尺寸;大字体尺寸可能会使页面显得杂乱且难以阅读。

使用简单易读的无衬线字体(如Arial)以提高可读性。

智力可访问性

使用尽可能简单的界面以便于理解。

使用简单具体的图标或图像与文本传达冗余信息,并适应多种理解信息的方式。

在网站上到处用其用途明确标记网站元素,即使这似乎多余,以便更易于理解导航和网站功能。

在适用的情况下提供具体示例,以适应理解抽象或概括方面的困难。

尽量减少滚动,以便用户无需依赖对内容的猜测来推断页面上可能有什么。

显示所有重要功能和网站导航(而不是组合框下拉区域内的),以便用户无需依赖猜测来判断项目是否存在以及如何访问它。例如,可以使用完全可见的列表框或单选按钮代替组合框。

在不牺牲准确性和特异性的前提下,使内容尽可能简短,以减轻认知负担。

社会可访问性

在语言使用上要具体准确;避免口语化表达、习语和歧义,以适应语言语用方面的困难。

解释任何非标准指令或不寻常信息背后的原因;提供额外的语用背景,以适应语言语用方面的困难。

在调查和表单中为确定性回答项目提供替代选项,例如“不知道”“不想说”或“不适用”,以减少因无法给出确切答案而产生的挫败感。

使用常见问题解答(FAQ)格式来组织复杂信息,以增强用户对信息为何可能对其有用以及如何与他们的生活相关联的清晰度。

定义可能因社会背景而有不同含义或可能是与特定领域相关的行话(如“药物相互作用”和 “医疗保健提供者”)的术语,以适应语言语用方面的困难。

留意自闭症文化和社区偏好,包括用于描述自闭症的语言以及基于社区的符号和历史可能如何影响内容和对网站可信度的认知。

相似文献

1
Development of the AASPIRE Web Accessibility Guidelines for Autistic Web Users.面向自闭症网络用户的AASPIRE网络可访问性指南的制定。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Jun 1;1(2):146-157. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0020. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
Creating Accessible Survey Instruments for Use with Autistic Adults and People with Intellectual Disability: Lessons Learned and Recommendations.为自闭症成年人和智障人士创建可使用的调查工具:经验教训与建议。
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Mar 1;2(1):61-76. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0074. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A Newly Developed Web-Based Resource on Genetic Eye Disorders for Users With Visual Impairment (Gene.Vision): Usability Study.面向视力障碍用户的新型遗传性眼病网络资源 (Gene.Vision):可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e19151. doi: 10.2196/19151.
5
Website accessibility in the tourism industry: an analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world.旅游业中的网站可访问性:对全球官方国家旅游组织网站的分析
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(24):2895-2906. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1362709. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
American Anesthesiology Residency Programs: Website Usability Analysis.美国麻醉学住院医师培训项目:网站可用性分析
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Oct 20;11(2):e38759. doi: 10.2196/38759.
7
Autism-Related Language Preferences of French-Speaking Autistic Adults: An Online Survey.说法语的成年自闭症患者的自闭症相关语言偏好:一项在线调查
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Sep 1;5(3):275-288. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0056. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
8
Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.针对轮椅使用者的地理空间辅助技术:移动用户界面可用性度量与标准及其潜在适用性的范围综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Feb;15(2):119-131. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1539876. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Virtual Reality Air Travel Training Using Apple iPhone X and Google Cardboard: A Feasibility Report with Autistic Adolescents and Adults.使用苹果iPhone X和谷歌纸板的虚拟现实航空旅行训练:一份针对自闭症青少年和成年人的可行性报告。
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Dec 1;2(4):325-333. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0076. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Participatory longitudinal qualitative interview study to understand Autistic gynaecological and obstetric health: the Autism from menstruation to menopause study protocol.参与式纵向定性访谈研究以了解自闭症患者的妇科和产科健康:从月经到更年期的自闭症研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e088343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088343.
2
Health care transition for autistic adolescents and young adults: A pilot rural and urban comparison survey study.自闭症青少年和青年的医疗保健过渡:一项农村与城市比较的试点调查研究。
Autism. 2025 Jun;29(6):1403-1414. doi: 10.1177/13623613241304495. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
Addressing Stigma-Related Health Disparities for Autistic Individuals Through Cultural Competemility: Insights from Research and Lived Experience.通过文化能力解决自闭症个体与污名相关的健康差异:来自研究和生活经历的见解
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):761-770. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01551-y. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
Harnessing real-life experiences: the development of guidelines to communicate research findings on Developmental Coordination Disorder/dyspraxia.利用现实生活经验:制定关于沟通发育性协调障碍/运动障碍研究结果的指南。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 8;10(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00611-0.
5
SPAN Website for Remote Intervention with Autistic Adolescents and Young Adults: Feasibility and Usability.针对自闭症青少年和青年的远程干预SPAN网站:可行性与可用性
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;10(9):1514. doi: 10.3390/children10091514.
6
Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based Workplace Disability Disclosure Decision Aid Tool for Autistic Youth and Young Adults: Qualitative Co-design Study.面向自闭症青少年和青年的基于网络的工作场所残疾披露决策辅助工具的开发与可用性测试:定性协同设计研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 27;7:e44354. doi: 10.2196/44354.
7
Barriers to Online Dementia Information and Mitigation.在线痴呆症信息的障碍与缓解措施
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2022 Apr;2022. doi: 10.1145/3491102.3517554. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
Early Assessment and Support Alliance Connections: Community-Based Participatory Research to Develop a Peer-based Early Psychosis Web Resource with Young Adults.早期评估和支持联盟联系:基于社区的参与式研究,为年轻人开发基于同伴的早期精神病网络资源。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(4):471-480. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0052.
9
"We are the stakeholders with the most at stake": scientific and autism community co-researchers reflect on their collaborative experience in the CONNECT project.“我们是利益相关度最高的利益相关者”:科学界与自闭症群体的共同研究者反思他们在“CONNECT项目”中的合作经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 27;6:58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00233-2. eCollection 2020.
10
"We have been magnified for years - Now you are under the microscope!": Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities Created an Online Survey to Challenge Public Understanding of Learning Disabilities.“多年来我们一直备受关注——现在轮到你们接受审视了!”:学习障碍共同研究者开展在线调查,以挑战公众对学习障碍的认知。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2020 Apr 21;20. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376278. eCollection 2020 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014.8 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍患病率 - 自闭症及发育障碍监测网,美国 11 个监测点,2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Apr 27;67(6):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1.
2
Do puzzle pieces and autism puzzle piece logos evoke negative associations?拼图和自闭症拼图标志会引起负面联想吗?
Autism. 2018 Feb;22(2):118-125. doi: 10.1177/1362361317727125. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
3
Intersections of Critical Systems Thinking and Community Based Participatory Research: A Learning Organization Example with the Autistic Community.关键系统思维与社区参与式研究的交叉点:一个与自闭症社区相关的学习型组织实例
Syst Pract Action Res. 2016 Oct;29(5):405-423. doi: 10.1007/s11213-016-9376-5. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
4
Barriers to healthcare: Instrument development and comparison between autistic adults and adults with and without other disabilities.医疗保健障碍:自闭症成年患者与其他残疾成年患者和非残疾成年患者之间的工具开发和比较。
Autism. 2017 Nov;21(8):972-984. doi: 10.1177/1362361316661261. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
5
The Development and Evaluation of an Online Healthcare Toolkit for Autistic Adults and their Primary Care Providers.面向成年自闭症患者及其初级保健提供者的在线医疗保健工具包的开发与评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1180-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3763-6. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
Community-Based Participatory Research to Adapt Health Measures for Use by People With Developmental Disabilities.基于社区的参与性研究,以调整健康措施供发育障碍患者使用。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):157-70. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0037.
7
Judging the Intensity of Emotional Expression in Faces: the Effects of Colored Tints on Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder.判断面部情绪表达的强度:色彩色调对自闭症谱系障碍个体的影响。
Autism Res. 2016 Apr;9(4):450-9. doi: 10.1002/aur.1506. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
8
"Respect the way I need to communicate with you": Healthcare experiences of adults on the autism spectrum.“尊重我与你交流所需的方式”:自闭症谱系成年人的医疗保健经历
Autism. 2015 Oct;19(7):824-31. doi: 10.1177/1362361315576221. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Intersections between the autism spectrum and the internet: perceived benefits and preferred functions of computer-mediated communication.自闭症谱系与互联网的交叉:计算机介导沟通的感知益处和偏好功能。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Dec;52(6):456-69. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-52.6.456.
10
Development of an audio-computer assisted self-interview to investigate violence and health in the lives of adults with developmental disabilities.开发一种音频计算机辅助自我访谈工具,以调查发育障碍成年人生活中的暴力与健康情况。
Disabil Health J. 2014 Jul;7(3):292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 25.