Gnanadurai Clement W, Yang Yang, Huang Ying, Li Zhenguang, Leyson Christina M, Cooper Tanya L, Platt Simon R, Harvey Stephen B, Hooper Douglas C, Faber Milosz, Fu Zhen F
Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America; State-key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Aug 20;9(8):e0004023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004023. eCollection 2015.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The experimental infection of dogs with TriGAS induced high levels of VNA in the serum, whereas wt RABV infection did not. Dogs infected with TriGAS developed antibodies against the virus including its glycoprotein, whereas dogs infected with DRV-NG11 only developed rabies antibodies that are presumably specific for the nucleoprotein, (N) and not the glycoprotein (G). We show that infection with TriGAS induces early activation of B cells in the draining lymph nodes and persistent activation of DCs and B cells in the blood. On the other hand, infection with DRV-NG11 fails to induce the activation of DCs and B cells and further reduces CD4 T cell production. Further, we show that intrathecal (IT) immunization of TriGAS not only induced high levels of VNA in the serum but also in the CSF while intramuscular (IM) immunization of TriGAS induced VNA only in the serum. In addition, high levels of total protein and WBC were detected in the CSF of IT immunized dogs, indicating the transient enhancement of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, which is relevant to the passage of immune effectors from periphery into the CNS.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IM infection of dogs with TriGAS induced the production of serum VNA whereas, IT immunization of TriGAS in dogs induces high levels of VNA in the periphery as well as in the CSF and transiently enhances BBB permeability. In contrast, infection with wt DRV-NG11 resulted in the production of RABV-reactive antibodies but VNA and antibodies specific for G were absent. As a consequence, all of the dogs infected with wt DRV-NG11 succumbed to rabies. Thus the failure to activate protective immunity is one of the important features of RABV pathogenesis in dogs.
方法/主要发现:用TriGAS对犬进行实验性感染可诱导血清中产生高水平的病毒中和抗体(VNA),而野生型狂犬病病毒(wt RABV)感染则不会。感染TriGAS的犬产生了针对该病毒包括其糖蛋白的抗体,而感染DRV - NG11的犬仅产生了可能针对核蛋白(N)而非糖蛋白(G)的狂犬病抗体。我们发现,感染TriGAS可诱导引流淋巴结中B细胞的早期活化以及血液中树突状细胞(DC)和B细胞的持续活化。另一方面,感染DRV - NG11未能诱导DC和B细胞的活化,反而进一步降低了CD4 T细胞的产生。此外,我们表明,TriGAS鞘内(IT)免疫不仅在血清中诱导了高水平的VNA,在脑脊液(CSF)中也诱导了高水平的VNA,而TriGAS肌肉内(IM)免疫仅在血清中诱导了VNA。此外,在IT免疫的犬的CSF中检测到高水平的总蛋白和白细胞,表明血脑屏障(BBB)通透性的短暂增强,这与免疫效应物从外周进入中枢神经系统有关。
结论/意义:用TriGAS对犬进行IM感染诱导了血清VNA的产生,而用TriGAS对犬进行IT免疫在外周以及CSF中诱导了高水平的VNA,并短暂增强了BBB通透性。相比之下,感染野生型DRV - NG11导致产生狂犬病病毒反应性抗体,但不存在VNA和针对G的特异性抗体。因此,所有感染野生型DRV - NG11的犬都死于狂犬病。因此,未能激活保护性免疫是犬狂犬病发病机制的重要特征之一。