Madhusudana Shampur N, Malavalli Bhavana V, Thankappan Ullas P, Sundramoorthy Subha, Belludi Ashwin Y, Pulagumbaly Srinivasa B, Sanyal Sampada
Department of Neurovirology; National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences; Bangalore, India.
Registrar, Department of Microbiology; Manipal Hospital; Bangalore, India.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(5):1359-65. doi: 10.4161/hv.28042. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Rabies claims about 55,000 human lives and many hundreds of thousands of livestock every year, worldwide. Despite a heavy disease burden, laboratory facilities to diagnose the infection remain scarce in most countries of the developing world where the disease is endemic. Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT) and Fluorescent Antibody Virus Neutralization Test (FAVN) are the common tests done in the rabies diagnostic laboratories to detect and quantitate Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibodies (RVNA). RFFIT is most often employed in confirming seroconversion following prophylactic vaccination, and to aid ante-mortem diagnosis in suspected cases of rabies. Though this remains one of the most sought-after diagnostic services in rabies laboratories, the requirements for expensive anti-rabies fluorochrome antibody conjugate and a fluorescent microscope restrict its performance to only a few reference laboratories. Cost-effective laboratory diagnostic methods employing affordable technology are a need of the hour in the rabies-endemic countries. In this study we have developed a new immunohistochemistry-based neutralization test and extensively evaluated it along with RFFIT. One hundred and 20 human serum samples collected after post-exposure vaccination were subjected to both the tests for determining RVNA titers. The results obtained with the new test correlated significantly with those of RFFIT. Further validation of the inter- and intra- assay precision, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and specificity was also performed. The best correlation between the 2 methods, however, was observed only when the RVNA concentrations in the samples were>20 IU/mL. Overall, the immunohistrochemistry-based neutralization test yielded satisfactory results. We suggest that it might serve as a cost-effective alternative to RFFIT in low-resource settings in the developing countries.
在全球范围内,狂犬病每年导致约5.5万人死亡以及数十万头牲畜死亡。尽管疾病负担沉重,但在该疾病流行的大多数发展中国家,用于诊断感染的实验室设施仍然稀缺。快速荧光灶抑制试验(RFFIT)和荧光抗体病毒中和试验(FAVN)是狂犬病诊断实验室中用于检测和定量狂犬病病毒中和抗体(RVNA)的常用试验。RFFIT最常用于确认预防性疫苗接种后的血清转化,并辅助对疑似狂犬病病例进行生前诊断。尽管这仍然是狂犬病实验室最受欢迎的诊断服务之一,但昂贵的抗狂犬病荧光染料抗体偶联物和荧光显微镜的要求限制了其仅能在少数参考实验室开展。在狂犬病流行国家,迫切需要采用经济实惠技术的具有成本效益的实验室诊断方法。在本研究中,我们开发了一种基于免疫组织化学的新中和试验,并与RFFIT一起进行了广泛评估。对暴露后接种疫苗后采集的120份人血清样本进行了两种试验,以确定RVNA滴度。新试验获得的结果与RFFIT的结果显著相关。还对试验间和试验内精密度、定量下限(LLOQ)和特异性进行了进一步验证。然而,只有当样本中的RVNA浓度>20 IU/mL时,才观察到这两种方法之间的最佳相关性。总体而言,基于免疫组织化学的中和试验产生了令人满意的结果。我们建议,在发展中国家的低资源环境中,它可能是RFFIT的一种具有成本效益的替代方法。