Suppr超能文献

基于主导频率和心房复杂碎裂电位联合应用的消融治疗非阵发性心房颤动的疗效

The efficacy of ablation based on the combined use of the dominant frequency and complex fractionated atrial electrograms for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Kumagai Koji, Nakano Masahiro, Kutsuzawa Daisuke, Yamaguchi Yoshiaki, Minami Kentaro, Oshima Shigeru

机构信息

The Division of Cardiology, Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

The Division of Cardiology, Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2016 Jun;67(6):545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate an approach for an endpoint of non-inducibility using a combined high-dominant frequency (DF) and continuous complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation following circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in a sequential fashion, including linear ablation as compared to PVI alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 84 non-paroxysmal patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were investigated retrospectively. The AF patients were divided into two groups: patients with PVI following a combined high-DF and continuous CFAE ablation with linear ablation (substrate modification group, n=59) and those with PVI alone (n=25). DF sites of ≥8Hz and then continuous CFAE sites defined by fractionation intervals of ≤50ms were modified after PVI. The ablation endpoint was non-inducibility. Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) could not be induced in 54 of 59 (92%) patients after a sequential ablation, and in 18 of 25 (64%) with PVI alone. The ATs freedom without antiarrhythmic drugs in the substrate modification group was significantly greater than that in those with PVI alone after 1 procedure during 12 months of follow-up (78.6% vs. 53.8%, log-rank test p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

This sequential approach using a substrate based ablation was associated with a better clinical long-term outcome as compared to PVI alone.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估一种在环肺静脉隔离(PVI)后依次采用高主导频率(DF)与连续碎裂心房电图(CFAE)联合消融作为非诱发终点的方法,包括与单纯PVI相比的线性消融。

方法与结果

对84例非阵发性心房颤动(AF)患者进行回顾性研究。AF患者分为两组:在PVI后采用高DF与连续CFAE联合消融并进行线性消融的患者(基质改良组,n = 59)和单纯进行PVI的患者(n = 25)。在PVI后对≥8Hz的DF部位以及随后由≤50ms的碎裂间期定义的连续CFAE部位进行改良。消融终点为非诱发。序贯消融后,59例患者中有54例(92%)不能诱发房性心律失常(ATs),单纯PVI组25例中有18例(64%)不能诱发。在随访的12个月期间,基质改良组在1次手术后无抗心律失常药物情况下的ATs无发作率显著高于单纯PVI组(78.6%对53.8%,对数秩检验p = 0.039)。

结论

与单纯PVI相比,这种基于基质的序贯消融方法具有更好的临床长期疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验