Kumagai Koji, Sato Tsukasa, Kurose Yuki, Sumiyoshi Takenori, Hasegawa Kaoru, Sekiguchi Yuko, Yambe Minoru, Komaru Tatsuya
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Miyagi Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2021 Dec 23;38(1):86-96. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12670. eCollection 2022 Feb.
This study aimed to evaluate the predictors of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias by structural and functional mapping: voltage, dominant frequency (DF), and rotor mapping after a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
A total of 66 nonparoxysmal AF patients were prospectively investigated. After the PVI, an online real-time phase mapping system was used to detect the location of rotors with critical nonpassively activated ratios (%NPs) of ≧50% in each left atrial (LA) segment, and high-DFs of ≧7 Hz were simultaneously mapped. After restoring sinus rhythm, low-voltage areas (LVAs < 0.5 mV) were mapped using the Advisor HD grid catheter (HDG).
Sixty-four of 66 (97%) AF patients had minimum to mild LVAs regardless of an enlarged LAD and LA volume (45 ± 6.0 mm and 141 ± 29 ml). There were no significant differences in the max and mean DF values and %NPs between the patients with and without recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, there was a significant difference in the LVA/LA surface area between the patients with and without recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (= .004). Atrial tachyarrhythmia freedom was significantly greater in those with LVAs of ≤3.3% than in those >3.3% after one procedure over 11.6 ± 0.8 months of follow-up (77.1% vs. 33.3%, < .001). In a multivariate analysis, the LVA/LA surface area after the PVI (HR 1.079; CI, 1.025-1.135, = .003) was an independent predictor of AF recurrence.
The predictor of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after the PVI was LVAs rather than DFs and rotors in nonparoxysmal AF patients.
本研究旨在通过结构和功能标测评估非阵发性心房颤动(AF)患者肺静脉隔离(PVI)术后房性快速性心律失常复发的预测因素:电压、主导频率(DF)和转子标测。
前瞻性研究了66例非阵发性AF患者。PVI术后,使用在线实时相位标测系统检测每个左心房(LA)节段中临界非被动激活率(%NPs)≥50%的转子位置,并同时标测≥7Hz的高DFs。恢复窦性心律后,使用Advisor HD网格导管(HDG)标测低电压区(LVAs<0.5mV)。
66例AF患者中有64例(97%)有轻度至中度LVAs,无论左心房直径(LAD)和左心房容积增大情况(分别为45±6.0mm和141±29ml)。有或无复发性房性快速性心律失常的患者之间,最大和平均DF值及%NPs无显著差异。然而,有或无复发性房性快速性心律失常的患者之间,LVA/LA表面积有显著差异(P = 0.004)。在11.6±0.8个月的随访期内,一次手术后LVA≤3.3%的患者房性快速性心律失常无复发率显著高于LVA>3.3%的患者(77.1%对33.3%,P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,PVI术后LVA/LA表面积(HR 1.079;CI,1.025 - 1.135,P = 0.003)是AF复发的独立预测因素。
在非阵发性AF患者中,PVI术后房性快速性心律失常复发的预测因素是LVAs而非DFs和转子。