Foshee Vangie A, Benefield Thad S, McNaughton Reyes Heath Luz, Eastman Meridith, Vivolo-Kantor Alana M, Basile Kathleen C, Ennett Susan T, Faris Robert
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Carolina Mammography Registry, Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):66-81. doi: 10.1002/ab.21606. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
This short-term longitudinal study examined whether the association between bullying perpetration and later physical dating violence perpetration and mediators of that association (via anger, depression, anxiety, and social status), varied depending on level of bullying victimization. Differences have been noted between those who bully but are not victims of bullying, and those who are both bullies and victims. These differences may influence dating violence risk and the explanations for why bullying leads to dating violence. Data were from dating adolescents in three rural counties who completed self-administered questionnaires in the fall semester of grades 8-10 and again in the spring semester. The sample (N = 2,414) was 44.08% male and 61.31% white. Bullying perpetration in the fall semester predicted physical dating violence perpetration in the spring semester when there was no bullying victimization, but not when there was any bullying victimization. Bullying perpetration was positively associated with anger at all levels of bullying victimization and with social status when there was no or low amounts of victimization; it was negatively associated with social status at high levels of victimization. Bullying victimization was positively associated with anger, depression, and anxiety at all levels of bullying perpetration. Anger mediated the association between bullying perpetration and dating violence, regardless of level of victimization; depression, anxiety, and social status did not mediate the association at any level of bullying victimization. The findings have implications for dating violence prevention efforts and for future research on the link between bullying and dating violence.
这项短期纵向研究考察了欺凌行为与之后的恋爱身体暴力行为之间的关联,以及该关联的中介因素(通过愤怒、抑郁、焦虑和社会地位)是否因欺凌受害程度而异。在那些实施欺凌但并非欺凌受害者的人与既是欺凌者又是受害者的人之间已发现差异。这些差异可能会影响恋爱暴力风险以及对欺凌为何会导致恋爱暴力的解释。数据来自三个乡村县的恋爱青少年,他们在八年级至十年级的秋季学期完成了自填式问卷,并在春季学期再次填写。样本(N = 2414)中男性占44.08%,白人占61.31%。在没有欺凌受害的情况下,秋季学期的欺凌行为可预测春季学期的恋爱身体暴力行为,但在存在任何欺凌受害的情况下则不然。在所有欺凌受害程度下,欺凌行为都与愤怒呈正相关,在没有或少量受害的情况下与社会地位呈正相关;在高受害程度下与社会地位呈负相关。在所有欺凌实施程度下,欺凌受害都与愤怒、抑郁和焦虑呈正相关。无论受害程度如何,愤怒都介导了欺凌行为与恋爱暴力之间的关联;在任何欺凌受害程度下,抑郁、焦虑和社会地位都未介导该关联。这些发现对恋爱暴力预防工作以及未来关于欺凌与恋爱暴力之间联系的研究具有启示意义。