Aawsaj Yousif, Light Duncan, Horgan Liam
Northumbria NHS Trust, Rake Lane, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2563-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4523-0. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
The treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones remains controversial with debate between endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and CBD exploration. A recent meta-analysis has shown no significant difference between these approaches; however, there is a trend in the literature to favour a single-stage procedure in the form of laparoscopic CBD exploration. We report our experience over a 15-year period.
All cases of CBD exploration were identified from 2000 to 2015 and analysed retrospectively from a large NHS Foundation Trust in Northumbria. There were no exclusions. The mean clinical follow-up was 6 months (range 3-36 months).
A total of 296 patients were included who underwent laparoscopic CBD exploration: 203 were female and 93 were male. The mean age was 60 years (range 16-84 years). A total of 231 procedures were performed electively and 65 as an emergency. Ten procedures were successfully performed as day cases. Eleven procedures were converted to an open procedure due to adhesions or a difficult dissection (4 %). Sixty-three procedures were performed with a transcystic approach with a mean post-op stay of 2 days (range 0-7). A total of 233 procedures were performed with a choledocotomy with a mean post-op stay of 6 days (range 3-14 days). Stone clearance was successful in 255 patients (86 %). Three patients died over the study period. Two were for medical complications and one for abdominal sepsis. Three patients returned to theatre for early post-operative bleeding (1 %). Sixteen patients had persistent bile leaks following a choledocotomy (6.8 %). No patients had a bile leak following transcystic exploration. Fourteen patients were followed up following failed stone removal. Nine had a successful ERCP, three had no stone seen on MRCP, and one patient required re-operation following a failed ERCP.
Laparoscopic bile duct exploration can be performed successfully in both the emergency and elective settings. Day-case surgery is feasible in selected patients. A transcystic approach should be favoured where possible.
胆总管结石的治疗方法仍存在争议,在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和胆总管探查术之间存在争论。最近的一项荟萃分析表明,这些方法之间没有显著差异;然而,文献中有倾向于采用腹腔镜胆总管探查术这种单阶段手术的趋势。我们报告我们15年来的经验。
从2000年至2015年确定所有胆总管探查病例,并对诺森伯兰郡一家大型国民保健服务基金会信托机构进行回顾性分析。没有排除病例。平均临床随访时间为6个月(范围3 - 36个月)。
共有296例患者接受了腹腔镜胆总管探查术:203例为女性,93例为男性。平均年龄为60岁(范围16 - 84岁)。共231例手术为择期手术,65例为急诊手术。10例手术作为日间手术成功完成。11例手术因粘连或解剖困难转为开放手术(4%)。63例手术采用经胆囊途径,术后平均住院时间为2天(范围0 - 7天)。共233例手术采用胆总管切开术,术后平均住院时间为6天(范围3 - 14天)。255例患者结石清除成功(86%)。研究期间有3例患者死亡。2例死于医疗并发症,1例死于腹部感染。3例患者因术后早期出血返回手术室(1%)。16例患者在胆总管切开术后持续胆汁漏(6.8%)。经胆囊探查术后无患者发生胆汁漏。14例患者结石清除失败后接受随访。9例患者ERCP成功,3例在磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)上未见结石,1例患者ERCP失败后需要再次手术。
腹腔镜胆管探查术在急诊和择期手术中均能成功进行。在选定的患者中,日间手术是可行的。应尽可能采用经胆囊途径。