Louw Adriaan, Schmidt Stephen G
International Spine and Pain Institute, Story City, IA, USA.
Kaiser Foundation Rehabilitation Center, Vallejo, CA, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Jul;23(3):162-8. doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000006.
In recent years there has been an increased interest in pain neuroscience in physical therapy.1,2 Emerging pain neuroscience research has challenged prevailing models used to understand and treat pain, including the Cartesian model of pain and the pain gate.2-4 Focus has shifted to the brain's processing of a pain experience, the pain neuromatrix and more recently, cortical reorganisation of body maps.2,3,5,6 In turn, these emerging theories have catapulted new treatments, such as therapeutic neuroscience education (TNE)7-10 and graded motor imagery (GMI),11,12 to the forefront of treating people suffering from persistent spinal pain. In line with their increased use, both of these approaches have exponentially gathered increasing evidence to support their use.4,10 For example, various randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews have shown that teaching patients more about the biology and physiology of their pain experience leads to positive changes in pain, pain catastrophization, function, physical movement and healthcare utilisation.7-10 Graded motor imagery, in turn, has shown increasing evidence to help pain and disability in complex pain states such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).11,12 Most research using TNE and GMI has focussed on chronic low back pain (CLBP) and CRPS and none of these advanced pain treatments have been trialled on the thoracic spine. This lack of research and writings in regards to the thoracic spine is not unique to pain science, but also in manual therapy. There are, however, very unique pain neuroscience issues that skilled manual therapists may find clinically meaningful when treating a patient struggling with persistent thoracic pain. Utilising the latest understanding of pain neuroscience, three key clinical chronic thoracic issues will be discussed - hypersensitisation of intercostal nerves, posterior primary rami nerves mimicking Cloward areas and mechanical and sensitisation issues of the spinal dura in the thoracic spine.
近年来,物理治疗领域对疼痛神经科学的兴趣日益浓厚。1,2 新兴的疼痛神经科学研究对用于理解和治疗疼痛的主流模型提出了挑战,包括笛卡尔疼痛模型和疼痛闸门理论。2-4 研究重点已转向大脑对疼痛体验的处理、疼痛神经矩阵,以及最近的身体图谱皮质重组。2,3,5,6 相应地,这些新兴理论推动了新的治疗方法,如治疗性神经科学教育(TNE)7-10 和分级运动想象(GMI)11,12,成为治疗持续性脊柱疼痛患者的前沿方法。随着它们的使用增加,这两种方法都积累了越来越多的证据来支持其应用。4,10 例如,各种随机对照试验和系统评价表明,让患者更多地了解其疼痛体验的生物学和生理学知识会导致疼痛、疼痛灾难化、功能、身体运动和医疗保健利用方面的积极变化。7-10 分级运动想象反过来也显示出越来越多的证据表明,它有助于缓解复杂疼痛状态(如复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS))中的疼痛和残疾。11,12 大多数使用 TNE 和 GMI 的研究都集中在慢性下腰痛(CLBP)和 CRPS 上,这些先进的疼痛治疗方法均未在胸椎上进行试验。关于胸椎的这种研究和著作的缺乏并非疼痛科学所独有,在手法治疗领域也是如此。然而,在治疗患有持续性胸痛的患者时,熟练的手法治疗师可能会发现一些非常独特的疼痛神经科学问题具有临床意义。利用对疼痛神经科学的最新理解,将讨论三个关键的临床慢性胸椎问题——肋间神经超敏反应、模仿克洛德区域的后支神经以及胸椎硬脊膜的机械性和致敏性问题。