McCallum Ethan B, Peterson Zoë D
Department of Psychology, Minneapolis VA Medical Center (116A), One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Nov;44(8):2287-97. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0590-5. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Factors related to the research context, such as inquiry mode, setting, and experimenter contact, may affect participants' comfort with and willingness to disclose certain sexual attitudes or admit to engaging in sensitive sexual behaviors. In this study, 255 female undergraduates (42.7 % non-White) completed a survey containing measures of sexual behavior and attitudes. The level of experimenter contact (high vs. low contact), setting (in lab vs. out of lab), and inquiry mode (pencil-and-paper vs. computer) were manipulated and participants were randomly assigned to conditions. We hypothesized that low-contact, out-of-lab, computer conditions would be associated with more liberal sexual attitudes and higher rates of reported sexual behaviors than high-contact, in-lab, and paper-and-pencil conditions, respectively. Further, we hypothesized that effects would be moderated by race, such that differences would be greater for non-White participants because of concerns that reporting socially undesirable behavior might fuel racial stereotypes. For attitudinal measures, White participants endorsed more liberal attitudes toward sex in high-contact conditions and non-White participants endorsed more liberal attitudes in low-contact conditions. For behavioral measures, non-White participants reported more behaviors on pencil-and-paper surveys than on computers. White participants demonstrated no significant mode-related differences or reported more sexual behaviors in computer conditions than paper-and-pencil conditions. Overall, results suggest that experimenter contact and mode significantly impact sexual self-report and this impact is often moderated by race.
与研究背景相关的因素,如询问方式、环境和实验者接触程度,可能会影响参与者在披露某些性态度或承认参与敏感性行为时的舒适度和意愿。在本研究中,255名女大学生(42.7%为非白人)完成了一项包含性行为和态度测量的调查。实验者接触程度(高接触与低接触)、环境(实验室内部与实验室外部)和询问方式(纸笔方式与计算机方式)被加以操控,参与者被随机分配到不同条件下。我们假设,与高接触、实验室内部和纸笔方式的条件相比,低接触、实验室外部和计算机方式的条件分别会与更开放的性态度以及更高的性行为报告率相关。此外,我们假设这种影响会因种族而有所不同,即对于非白人参与者来说差异会更大,因为他们担心报告社会不认可的行为可能会助长种族刻板印象。对于态度测量,白人参与者在高接触条件下对性的态度更开放,而非白人参与者在低接触条件下态度更开放。对于行为测量,非白人参与者在纸笔调查中报告的行为比在计算机调查中更多。白人参与者在计算机条件下与纸笔条件下相比,未表现出显著的方式相关差异,或者报告了更多的性行为。总体而言,结果表明实验者接触程度和方式会显著影响性自我报告,而且这种影响常常因种族而有所不同。