1 Minneapolis VA Medical Center, MN, USA.
2 University of Missouri-St. Louis, MO, USA.
Violence Against Women. 2017 Jun;23(7):850-870. doi: 10.1177/1077801216651338. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
Female college students ( N = 255) provided self-report of adult sexual assault (ASA) and child sexual abuse (CSA) in one of eight randomly assigned conditions which manipulated three methodological variables (level of researcher contact, setting, and inquiry mode). The impact of methodology on reporting was examined, with race as a moderator. Non-White participants reported significantly more CSA than White participants out of lab, but differences were not observed in lab. White participants reported significantly more ASA than non-White participants on pencil-and-paper surveys, but there were no differences on computer surveys. Interpretation of race-related differences in self-reported victimization may require consideration of methodological effects.
共有 255 名女大学生参与了研究,她们在 8 种随机分配的条件下,报告了自己遭受的成人期性侵犯(ASA)和儿童性虐待(CSA),这 8 种条件分别对 3 个方法学变量(研究人员的接触程度、情境和问询方式)进行了操作。研究考察了方法学对报告的影响,并以种族为调节变量。非裔参与者在实验室外报告的 CSA 显著多于白种参与者,但在实验室中则没有观察到差异。在纸笔调查中,白种参与者报告的 ASA 显著多于非裔参与者,但在计算机调查中则没有差异。在解释自我报告的受害情况中的种族差异时,可能需要考虑方法学效应。