Bottoni Craig R, Smith Eric L, Shaha James, Shaha Steven S, Raybin Sarah G, Tokish John M, Rowles Douglas J
Sports Medicine Section, Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2501-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515596406. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
The use of allografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young athletes is controversial. No long-term results have been published comparing tibialis posterior allografts to hamstring autografts.
To evaluate the long-term results of primary ACL reconstruction using either an allograft or autograft.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
From June 2002 to August 2003, patients with a symptomatic ACL-deficient knee were randomized to receive either a hamstring autograft or tibialis posterior allograft. All allografts were from a single tissue bank, aseptically processed, and fresh-frozen without terminal irradiation. Graft fixation was identical in all knees. All patients followed the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol, which was blinded to the therapists. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were performed via examination and/or telephone and Internet-based questionnaire to ascertain the functional and subjective status using established knee metrics. The primary outcome measures were graft integrity, subjective knee stability, and functional status.
There were 99 patients (100 knees); 86 were men, and 95% were active-duty military. Both groups were similar in demographics and preoperative activity level. The mean and median ages of both groups were identical at 29 and 26 years, respectively. Concomitant meniscal and chondral pathologic abnormalities, microfracture, and meniscal repair performed at the time of reconstruction were similar in both groups. At a minimum of 10 years (range, 120-132 months) from surgery, 96 patients (97 knees) were contacted (2 patients were deceased, and 1 was unable to be located). There were 4 (8.3%) autograft and 13 (26.5%) allograft failures that required revision reconstruction. In the remaining patients whose graft was intact, there was no difference in the mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner, or International Knee Documentation Committee scores.
At a minimum of 10 years after ACL reconstruction in a young athletic population, over 80% of all grafts were intact and had maintained stability. However, those patients who had an allograft failed at a rate over 3 times higher than those with an autograft.
在年轻运动员中使用同种异体移植物进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建存在争议。目前尚未发表比较胫后同种异体移植物与腘绳肌自体移植物的长期结果。
评估使用同种异体移植物或自体移植物进行初次ACL重建的长期结果。
随机对照试验;证据等级,1级。
2002年6月至2003年8月,对有症状的ACL损伤膝关节患者进行随机分组,分别接受腘绳肌自体移植物或胫后同种异体移植物。所有同种异体移植物均来自单一组织库,经过无菌处理,新鲜冷冻且未进行终端照射。所有膝关节的移植物固定方式相同。所有患者均遵循相同的术后康复方案,治疗师对此方案不知情。术前和术后通过检查和/或电话以及基于互联网的问卷进行评估,以使用既定的膝关节指标确定功能和主观状态。主要结局指标为移植物完整性、主观膝关节稳定性和功能状态。
共有99例患者(100个膝关节);86例为男性,95%为现役军人。两组在人口统计学和术前活动水平方面相似。两组的平均年龄和中位数年龄分别相同,均为29岁和26岁。两组在重建时同时存在的半月板和软骨病理异常、微骨折以及半月板修复情况相似。在至少距离手术10年(范围为120 - 132个月)时,联系到了96例患者(97个膝关节)(2例患者已故,1例无法找到)。有4例(8.3%)自体移植物和13例(26.5%)同种异体移植物失败,需要进行翻修重建。在其余移植物完整的患者中,平均单项评估数值评定、特格纳或国际膝关节文献委员会评分无差异。
在年轻运动员人群中进行ACL重建至少10年后,超过80%的移植物完整且维持了稳定性。然而,接受同种异体移植物的患者失败率比接受自体移植物的患者高出3倍以上。